Usefulness of Measuring Antiepileptic Medication Blood Levels in Patients with Epilepsy
FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.
FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.
Am Fam Physician. 2010 Nov 1;82(9):1070.
Should persons with epilepsy have routine monitoring of medication blood levels to optimize treatment for preventing seizures?
When treating a patient for epilepsy, there is not enough evidence to indicate if optimal seizure control is best obtained by routinely measuring medication levels compared with making adjustments based on the clinical picture. (Strength of Recommendation = C, based on consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series)
Antiepileptic medications are the mainstay of epilepsy treatment. The goal is to maintain a medication dosage with as few seizures and adverse effects as possible. To achieve this, physicians often monitor drug levels in the blood. However, many have questioned if it is better to manage epilepsy by measuring therapeutic drug levels or by titrating medication dosages based on a patient's clinical picture.
In this Cochrane review, the authors did a meta-analysis that examined blinded and unblinded randomized controlled trials of antiepileptic drug monitoring. Participants were of all ages, had various seizure types, and were treated with any antiepileptic monotherapy. The intervention was measurement of antiepileptic drug concentration. Only two studies were identified, and only one prospective randomized study met the inclusion criteria of the review. The other study was excluded because patients were treated with more than one antiepileptic medication.
The study reviewed was an unblinded, prospective, parallel-group design of 180 patients with newly diagnosed, untreated epilepsy. Patients were randomized into a group with drug-level monitoring (intervention) or a group that used the clinical picture alone to alter medication dosage (control). The investigators found no difference in outcomes between the two groups. By 12 months, about 60 percent of patients from both groups achieved remission from seizures, and about one half reported adverse effects.
A position paper published in 2008 by the International League Against Epilepsy Commission on Therapeutic Strategies suggests that routine monitoring of therapeutic drug levels plays a valuable role in epilepsy treatment.1 The paper's recommendations are based on nonrandomized studies and clinical experience, but it acknowledges that there have been no randomized controlled trials indicating the benefit of drug-level monitoring. Although routine monitoring remains the standard of care, it is important for physicians to know that it is not based on good-quality evidence and to watch for additional studies.
Author disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Tomson T, Dahl ML, Kimland E. Therapeutic monitoring of antiepileptic drugs for epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(1):CD002216.
1. Patsalos PN, Berry DJ, Bourgeois BF, et al. Antiepileptic drugs—best practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring: a position paper by the subcommission on therapeutic drug monitoring, ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies. Epilepsia. 2008;49(7):1239–1276.
Copyright © 2010 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions