Evaluation and Management of Intestinal Obstruction

Am Fam Physician. 2011 Jan 15;83(2):159-165.

  Patient information: See related handout on intestinal obstruction, written by the authors of this article.

Acute intestinal obstruction occurs when there is an interruption in the forward flow of intestinal contents. This interruption can occur at any point along the length of the gastrointestinal tract, and clinical symptoms often vary based on the level of obstruction. Intestinal obstruction is most commonly caused by intra-abdominal adhesions, malignancy, or intestinal herniation. The clinical presentation generally includes nausea and emesis, colicky abdominal pain, and a failure to pass flatus or bowel movements. The classic physical examination findings of abdominal distension, tympany to percussion, and high-pitched bowel sounds suggest the diagnosis. Radiologic imaging can confirm the diagnosis, and can also serve as useful adjunctive investigations when the diagnosis is less certain. Although radiography is often the initial study, non-contrast computed tomography is recommended if the index of suspicion is high or if suspicion persists despite negative radiography. Management of uncomplicated obstructions includes fluid resuscitation with correction of metabolic derangements, intestinal decompression, and bowel rest. Evidence of vascular compromise or perforation, or failure to resolve with adequate bowel decompression is an indication for surgical intervention.

Intestinal obstruction accounts for approximately 15 percent of all emergency department visits for acute abdominal pain.1 Complications of intestinal obstruction include bowel ischemia and perforation. Morbidity and mortality associated with intestinal obstruction have declined since the advent of more sophisticated diagnostic tests, but the condition remains a challenging surgical diagnosis. Physicians who are treating patients with intestinal obstruction must weigh the risks of surgery with the consequences of inappropriate conservative management. A suggested approach to the patient with suspected small bowel obstruction is shown in Figure 1.

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendation Evidence rating References Comments

Abdominal radiography is an effective initial examination in patients with suspected intestinal obstruction.

C

6, 7

Radiography has greater sensitivity in high-grade obstruction than in partial obstruction.

Computed tomography is warranted when radiography indicates high-grade intestinal obstruction or is inconclusive.

C

810

Computed tomography can reliably determine the cause of obstruction, and whether serious complications are present, in most patients with high-grade obstructions.

Upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy with small bowel follow-through can determine the need for surgical intervention in patients with partial obstruction.

C

14, 15

Contrast material that passes into the cecum within four hours of oral administration is highly predictive of successful nonoperative management.

Antibiotics can protect against bacterial translocation and subsequent bacteremia in patients with intestinal obstruction.

C

22

Enteric bacteria have been found in cultures from serosal scrapings and mesenteric lymph node biopsy in patients requiring surgery.

Clinically stable patients can be treated conservatively with bowel rest, intubation and decompression, and intravenous fluid resuscitation.

A

2226

Several randomized controlled trials have shown that surgery can be avoided with conservative management.

Surgery is warranted in patients with intestinal obstruction that does not resolve within 48 hours after conservative therapy is initiated.

B

25

Study found that conservative management beyond 48 hours does not diminish the need for surgery, but increases surgical morbidity.


A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

View Table

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendation Evidence rating References Comments

Abdominal radiography is an effective initial examination in patients with suspected intestinal obstruction.

C

6, 7

Radiography has greater sensitivity in high-grade obstruction than in partial obstruction.

Computed tomography is warranted when radiography indicates high-grade intestinal obstruction or is inconclusive.

C

810

Computed tomography can reliably determine the cause of obstruction, and whether serious complications are present, in most patients with high-grade obstructions.

Upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy with small bowel follow-through can determine the need for surgical intervention in patients with partial obstruction.

C

14, 15

Contrast material that passes into the cecum within four hours of oral administration is highly predictive of successful nonoperative management.

Antibiotics can protect against bacterial translocation and subsequent bacteremia in patients with intestinal obstruction.

C

22

Enteric bacteria have been found in cultures from serosal scrapings and mesenteric lymph node biopsy in patients requiring surgery.

Clinically stable patients can be treated conservatively with bowel rest, intubation and decompression, and intravenous fluid resuscitation.

A

2226

Several randomized controlled trials have shown that surgery can be avoided with conservative management.

Surgery is warranted in patients with intestinal obstruction that does not resolve within 48 hours after conservative therapy is initiated.

B

25

Study found that conservative management beyond 48 hours does not diminish the need for surgery, but increases surgical morbidity.


A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

Management of Small Bowel Obstruction

Figure 1.

Algorithm for evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected small bowel obstruction.

View Large

Management of Small Bowel Obstruction


Figure 1.

Algorithm for evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected small bowel obstruction.

Management of Small Bowel Obstruction


Figure 1.

Algorithm for evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected small bowel obstruction.

Pathophysiology

The fundamental concerns about intestinal obstruction are its effect on whole body fluid/electrolyte balances and the mechanical effect that increased pressure has on intestinal perfusion. Proximal to the point of obstruction, the intestinal tract dilates as it fills with intestinal secretions and swallowed air.2 Failure of intestinal contents to pass through the intestinal tract leads to a cessation of flatus and bowel movements. Intestinal obstruction can be broadly differentiated into small bowel and large bowel obstruction.

Fluid loss from emesis, bowel edema, and loss of absorptive capacity leads to dehydration. Emesis leads to loss of gastric potassium, hydrogen, and chloride ions, and significant dehydration stimulates renal proximal tubule reabsorption of bicarbonate and loss of chloride, perpetuating the metabolic alkalosis.3 In addition to derangements in fluid and electrolyte balance, intestinal stasis leads to overgrowth of intestinal flora, which may lead to the development of feculent emesis. Additionally, overgrowth of intestinal flora in the small bowel leads to bacterial translocation across the bowel wall.4

Ongoing dilation of the intestine increases luminal pressures. When luminal pressures exceed venous pressures, loss of venous drainage causes increasing edema and hyperemia of the bowel. This may eventually lead to compromised arterial flow to the bowel, causing ischemia, necrosis, and perforation. A closed-loop obstruction, in which a section of bowel is obstructed proximally and distally, may undergo this process rapidly, with few presenting symptoms. Intestinal volvulus, the prototypical closed-loop obstruction, causes torsion of arterial inflow and venous drainage, and is a surgical emergency.

Causes and Risk Factors

The most common causes of intestinal obstruction include adhesions, neoplasms, and herniation (Table 1). Adhesions resulting from prior abdominal surgery are the predominant cause of small bowel obstruction, accounting for approximately 60 percent of cases.5 Lower abdominal surgeries, including appendectomies, colorectal surgery, gynecologic procedures, and hernia repairs, confer a greater risk of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Less common causes of obstruction include intestinal intussusception, volvulus, intra-abdominal abscesses, gallstones, and foreign bodies.

Table 1.

Causes of Intestinal Obstruction

Adhesive disease (60 percent)

Neoplasm (20 percent)

Herniation (10 percent)

Inflammatory bowel disease (5 percent)

Intussusception (< 5 percent)

Volvulus (< 5 percent)

Other (< 5 percent)

Table 1.   Causes of Intestinal Obstruction

View Table

Table 1.

Causes of Intestinal Obstruction

Adhesive disease (60 percent)

Neoplasm (20 percent)

Herniation (10 percent)

Inflammatory bowel disease (5 percent)

Intussusception (< 5 percent)

Volvulus (< 5 percent)

Other (< 5 percent)

History and Physical Examination

Patients should be asked about their history of abdominal neoplasia, hernia or hernia repair, and inflammatory bowel disease, because these conditions increase the risk of obstruction. The hallmarks of intestinal obstruction include colicky abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, abdominal distension, and a cessation of flatus and bowel movements. It is important to differentiate between true mechanical obstruction and other causes of these symptoms (Table 2). Distal obstructions allow for a greater intestinal reservoir, with pain and distension more marked than emesis, whereas patients with proximal obstructions may have minimal abdominal distension but marked emesis. The presence of hypotension and tachycardia is an indication of severe dehydration. Abdominal palpation may reveal a distended, tympanitic abdomen; however, this finding may not be present in patients with early or proximal obstruction. Auscultation in patients with early obstruction reveals high-pitched bowel sounds, whereas those with late obstruction may present with minimal bowel sounds as the intestinal tract becomes hypotonic.

Table 2.

Differential Diagnosis of Abdominal Pain, Distension, Nausea, and Cessation of Flatus and Bowel Movements

Alternate diagnosis Clues

Ascites

Acute liver failure, history of hepatitis or alcoholism

Medications (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants, narcotics)

Review of medications; diagnosis of exclusion

Mesenteric ischemia

History of peripheral vascular disease, hypercoagulable state, or postprandial abdominal angina; recent use of vasopressors

Perforated viscus/intra-abdominal sepsis

Fever, leukocytosis, acute abdomen, free air on imaging

Postoperative paralytic ileus

Recent abdominal surgery with no postoperative flatus or bowel movement

Pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie syndrome)

Acutely dilated large intestine, history of intestinal dysmotility, diabetes mellitus, scleroderma

Table 2.   Differential Diagnosis of Abdominal Pain, Distension, Nausea, and Cessation of Flatus and Bowel Movements

View Table

Table 2.

Differential Diagnosis of Abdominal Pain, Distension, Nausea, and Cessation of Flatus and Bowel Movements

Alternate diagnosis Clues

Ascites

Acute liver failure, history of hepatitis or alcoholism

Medications (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants, narcotics)

Review of medications; diagnosis of exclusion

Mesenteric ischemia

History of peripheral vascular disease, hypercoagulable state, or postprandial abdominal angina; recent use of vasopressors

Perforated viscus/intra-abdominal sepsis

Fever, leukocytosis, acute abdomen, free air on imaging

Postoperative paralytic ileus

Recent abdominal surgery with no postoperative flatus or bowel movement

Pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie syndrome)

Acutely dilated large intestine, history of intestinal dysmotility, diabetes mellitus, scleroderma

Diagnostic Testing and Imaging

LABORATORY TESTS

Laboratory evaluation of patients with suspected obstruction should include a complete blood count and metabolic panel. Hypokalemic, hypochloremic metabolic alkalosis may be noted in patients with severe emesis. Elevated blood urea nitrogen levels are consistent with dehydration, and hemoglobin and hematocrit levels may be increased. The white blood cell count may be elevated if intestinal bacteria translocate into the bloodstream, causing the systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis. The development of metabolic acidosis, especially in a patient with an increasing serum lactate level, may signal bowel ischemia.

RADIOGRAPHY

The initial evaluation of patients with clinical signs and symptoms of intestinal obstruction should include plain upright abdominal radiography. Radiography can quickly determine if intestinal perforation has occurred; free air can be seen above the liver in upright films or left lateral decubitus films. Radiography accurately diagnoses intestinal obstruction in approximately 60 percent of cases,6 and its positive predictive value approaches 80 percent in patients with high-grade intestinal obstruction.7 However, plain abdominal films can appear normal in early obstruction and in high jejunal or duodenal obstruction. Therefore, when clinical suspicion for obstruction is high or persists despite negative initial radiography, non-contrast computed tomography (CT) should be ordered.8

In patients with small bowel obstruction, supine views show dilation of multiple loops of small bowel, with a paucity of air in the large bowel (Figure 2). Those with large bowel obstruction may have dilation of the colon, with decompressed small bowel in the setting of a competent ileocecal valve. Upright or lateral decubitus films may show laddering air fluid levels (Figure 3). These findings, in conjunction with a lack of air and stool in the distal colon and rectum, are highly suggestive of mechanical intestinal obstruction.

Figure 2.

Supine view of the abdomen in a patient with intestinal obstruction. Dilated loops of small bowel are visible (arrows).

View Large


Figure 2.

Supine view of the abdomen in a patient with intestinal obstruction. Dilated loops of small bowel are visible (arrows).


Figure 2.

Supine view of the abdomen in a patient with intestinal obstruction. Dilated loops of small bowel are visible (arrows).

Figure 3.

Lateral decubitus view of the abdomen, showing air-fluid levels consistent with intestinal obstruction (arrows).

View Large


Figure 3.

Lateral decubitus view of the abdomen, showing air-fluid levels consistent with intestinal obstruction (arrows).


Figure 3.

Lateral decubitus view of the abdomen, showing air-fluid levels consistent with intestinal obstruction (arrows).

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

CT is appropriate for further evaluation of patients with suspected intestinal obstruction in whom clinical examination and radiography do not yield a definitive diagnosis. CT is sensitive for detection of high-grade obstruction (up to 90 percent in some series),9 and has the additional benefit of defining the cause and level of obstruction in most patients.1012 In addition, CT can identify emergent causes of intestinal obstruction, such as volvulus or intestinal strangulation.

CT findings in patients with intestinal obstruction include dilated loops of bowel proximal to the site of obstruction, with distally decompressed bowel. The presence of a discrete transition point helps guide operative planning (Figure 4). Absence of contrast material in the rectum is also an important sign of complete obstruction. For this reason, rectal administration of contrast material should be avoided. A C-loop of distended bowel with radial mesenteric vessels with medial conversion is highly suspicious for intestinal volvulus. Thickened intestinal walls and poor flow of contrast material into a section of bowel suggests ischemia, whereas pneumatosis intestinalis, free intra-peritoneal air, and mesenteric fat stranding suggest necrosis and perforation.

Figure 4.

Axial computed tomography scan showing dilated, contrast-filled loops of bowel on the patient's left (yellow arrows), with decompressed distal small bowel on the patient's right (red arrows). The cause of obstruction, an incarcerated umbilical hernia, can also be seen (green arrow), with proximally dilated bowel entering the hernia and decompressed bowel exiting the hernia.

View Large


Figure 4.

Axial computed tomography scan showing dilated, contrast-filled loops of bowel on the patient's left (yellow arrows), with decompressed distal small bowel on the patient's right (red arrows). The cause of obstruction, an incarcerated umbilical hernia, can also be seen (green arrow), with proximally dilated bowel entering the hernia and decompressed bowel exiting the hernia.


Figure 4.

Axial computed tomography scan showing dilated, contrast-filled loops of bowel on the patient's left (yellow arrows), with decompressed distal small bowel on the patient's right (red arrows). The cause of obstruction, an incarcerated umbilical hernia, can also be seen (green arrow), with proximally dilated bowel entering the hernia and decompressed bowel exiting the hernia.

Although CT is highly sensitive and specific for high-grade obstruction, its value diminishes in patients with partial obstruction. In these patients, oral contrast material may be seen traversing the length of the intestine to the rectum, with no discrete area of transition. Fluoroscopy may be of greater value in confirming the diagnosis.

The American College of Radiology recommends non-contrast CT as the initial imaging modality of choice.13 However, because most causes of small bowel obstruction will have systemic manifestations or fail to resolve—necessitating operative intervention—the additional diagnostic value of CT compared with radiography is limited. Radiation exposure is also significant. Therefore, in most patients, CT should be ordered when the diagnosis is in doubt, when there is no surgical history or hernias to explain the etiology, or when there is a high index of suspicion for complete or high-grade obstruction.

CONTRAST FLUOROSCOPY

Contrast studies, such as a small bowel follow-through, can be helpful in the diagnosis of a partial intestinal obstruction in patients with high clinical suspicion and in clinically stable patients in whom initial conservative management was not effective.14 The use of water-soluble contrast material is not only diagnostic, but may also be therapeutic in patients with partial small-bowel obstruction. A randomized controlled trial of 124 patients showed a 74 percent reduction in the need for surgical intervention in patients receiving gastrografin fluoroscopy within 24 hours of initial presentation.15 Contrast fluoroscopy may also be useful in determining the need for surgery; the presence of contrast material in the rectum within 24 hours of administration has a 97 percent sensitivity for spontaneous resolution of intestinal obstruction.16,17

There are several variations of contrast fluoroscopy. In the small-bowel follow-through study, the patient drinks contrast material, then serial abdominal radiographs are taken to visualize the passage of contrast through the intestinal tract. Enteroclysis involves naso- or oro-duodenal intubation, followed by the instillation of contrast material directly into the small bowel. Although this study has superior sensitivity compared with small-bowel follow-through,18 it is more labor-intensive and is rarely performed. Rectal fluoroscopy can be helpful in determining the site of a suspected large bowel obstruction.

ULTRASONOGRAPHY

In patients with high-grade obstruction, ultrasound evaluation of the abdomen has high sensitivity for intestinal obstruction, approaching 85 percent.19 However, because of the wide availability of CT, it has largely replaced ultrasonography as the first-line investigation in stable patients with suspected intestinal obstruction. Ultrasonography remains a valuable investigation for unstable patients with an ambiguous diagnosis and in patients for whom radiation exposure is contraindicated, such as pregnant women.

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be more sensitive than CT in the evaluation of intestinal obstruction.20 MRI enteroclysis, which involves intubation of the duodenum and infusion of contrast material directly into the small bowel, can more reliably determine the location and cause of obstruction.21 However, because of the ease and cost-effectiveness of abdominal CT, MRI remains an investigational or adjunctive imaging modality for intestinal obstruction.

Treatment

Management of intestinal obstruction is directed at correcting physiologic derangements caused by the obstruction, bowel rest, and removing the source of obstruction. The former is addressed by intravenous fluid resuscitation with isotonic fluid. The use of a bladder catheter to closely monitor urine output is the minimum requirement for gauging the adequacy of resuscitation; other invasive measures, such as arterial canalization or central venous pressure monitoring, can be used as the clinical situation warrants. Antibiotics are used to treat intestinal overgrowth of bacteria and translocation across the bowel wall.22 The presence of fever and leukocytosis should prompt inclusion of antibiotics in the initial treatment regimen. Antibiotics should have coverage against gram-negative organisms and anaerobes, and the choice of a specific agent should be determined by local susceptibility and availability. Aggressive replacement of electrolytes is recommended after adequate renal function is confirmed.

The decision to perform surgery for intestinal obstruction can be difficult. Peritonitis, clinical instability, or unexplained leukocytosis or acidosis are concerning for abdominal sepsis, intestinal ischemia, or perforation; these findings mandate immediate surgical exploration. Patients with an obstruction that resolves after reduction of a hernia should be scheduled for elective hernia repair, whereas immediate surgery is required in patients with an irreducible or strangulated hernia. Stable patients with a history of abdominal malignancy or high suspicion for malignancy should be thoroughly evaluated for optimal surgical planning. Abdominal malignancy can be treated with primary resection and reconstruction or palliative diversion, or placement of venting and feeding tubes.

Treatment of stable patients with intestinal obstruction and a history of abdominal surgery presents a challenge. Conservative management of a high-grade obstruction should be attempted initially, using intestinal intubation and decompression, aggressive intravenous rehydration, and antibiotics. The inclusion of oral magnesium hydroxide, simethicone, and probiotics decreased the length of hospitalization in a randomized controlled trial of 144 patients with partial small bowel obstructions (number needed to treat = 7).23 Caution should be used when clinical and radiologic evidence suggest complete obstruction, because the use of intestinal stimulation can exacerbate the obstruction and precipitate intestinal ischemia.

Conservative management is successful in 40 to 70 percent of clinically stable patients, with a higher success rate in those with partial obstruction.2426 Although conservative management is associated with shorter initial hospitalization (4.9 versus 12 days), there is also a higher rate of eventual recurrence (40.5 versus 26.8 percent).27 With conservative management, resolution generally occurs within 24 to 48 hours. Beyond this time frame, the risk of complications, including vascular compromise, increases. If intestinal obstruction is not resolved with conservative management, surgical evaluation is required.25

The Authors

PATRICK G. JACKSON, MD, is chief of gastrointestinal surgery at Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.

MANISH RAIJI, MD, is a third year surgical resident at Georgetown University Hospital.

Address correspondence to Patrick G. Jackson, MD, 3800 Reservoir Rd., 4th Floor, PHC, Washington, DC 20007. Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: Nothing to disclose.


Figures 2 through 4 provided by Cirrelda J. Cooper, MD.

REFERENCES

1. Irvin TT. Abdominal pain: a surgical audit of 1190 emergency admissions. Br J Surg. 1989;76(11):1121–1125.

2. Wright HK, O'Brien JJ, Tilson MD. Water absorption in experimental closed segment obstruction of the ileum in man. Am J Surg. 1971;121(1):96–99.

3. Wangensteen OH. Understanding the bowel obstruction problem. Am J Surg. 1978;135(2):131–149.

4. Rana SV, Bhardwaj SB. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(9):1030–1037.

5. Shelton BK. Intestinal obstruction [published correction appears in AACN Clin Issues. 2000;11(1):following table of contents]. AACN Clin Issues. 1999;10(4):478–491.

6. Maglinte DD, Heitkamp DE, Howard TJ, Kelvin FM, Lap-pas JC. Current concepts in imaging of small bowel obstruction. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003;41(2):263–283.

7. Lappas JC, Reyes BL, Maglinte DD. Abdominal radiography findings in small-bowel obstruction: relevance to triage for additional diagnostic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(1):167–174.

8. Stoker J, van Randen A, Laméris W, Boermeester MA. Imaging patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiology. 2009;253(1):31–46.

9. Suri S, Gupta S, Sudhakar PJ, Venkataramu NK, Sood B, Wig JD. Comparative evaluation of plain films, ultrasound and CT in the diagnosis of intestinal obstruction. Acta Radiol. 1999;40(4):422–428.

10. Furukawa A, Yamasaki M, Furuichi K, et al. Helical CT in the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. Radiographics. 2001;21(2):341–355.

11. Gazelle GS, Goldberg MA, Wittenberg J, Halpern EF, Pinkney L, Mueller PR. Efficacy of CT in distinguishing small-bowel obstruction from other causes of small-bowel dilatation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162(1):43–47.

12. Frager DH, Baer JW, Rothpearl A, Bossart PA. Distinction between postoperative ileus and mechanical small-bowel obstruction: value of CT compared with clinical and other radiographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164(4):891–894.

13. Ros PR, Huprich JE. ACR Appropriateness Criteria on suspected small-bowel obstruction. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;3(11):838–841.

14. Hayanga AJ, Bass-Wilkins K, Bulkley GB. Current management of small-bowel obstruction. Adv Surg. 2005;39:1–33.

15. Choi HK, Chu KW, Law WL. Therapeutic value of gastrografin in adhesive small bowel obstruction after unsuccessful conservative treatment: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2002;236(1):1–6.

16. Abbas S, Bissett IP, Parry BR. Oral water soluble contrast for the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(3):CD004651.

17. Anderson CA, Humphrey WT. Contrast radiography in small bowel obstruction: a prospective, randomized trial. Mil Med. 1997;162(11):749–752.

18. Dunn JT, Halls JM, Berne TV. Roentgenographic contrast studies in acute small-bowel obstruction. Arch Surg. 1984;119(11):1305–1308.

19. Lim JH, Ko YT, Lee DH, Lee HW, Lim JW. Determining the site and causes of colonic obstruction with sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163(5):1113–1117.

20. Matsuoka H, Takahara T, Masaki T, Sugiyama M, Hachiya J, Atomi Y. Preoperative evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with bowel obstruction. Am J Surg. 2002;183(6):614–617.

21. Wiarda BM, Horsthuis K, Dobben AC, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel with the true FISP sequence: intra- and interobserver agreement of enteroclysis and imaging without contrast material. Clin Imaging. 2009;33(4):267–273.

22. Sagar PM, MacFie J, Sedman P, May J, Mancey-Jones B, Johnstone D. Intestinal obstruction promotes gut translocation of bacteria. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38(6):640–644.

23. Chen SC, Yen ZS, Lee CC, et al. Nonsurgical management of partial adhesive small-bowel obstruction with oral therapy: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2005;173(10):1165–1169.

24. Mosley JG, Shoaib A. Operative versus conservative management of adhesional intestinal obstruction. Br J Surg. 2000;87(3):362–373.

25. Fevang BT, Jensen D, Svanes K, Viste A. Early operation or conservative management of patients with small bowel obstruction? Eur J Surg. 2002;168(8–9):475–481.

26. Williams SB, Greenspon J, Young HA, Orkin BA. Small bowel obstruction: conservative vs. surgical management. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(6):1140–1146.

27. Cox MR, Gunn IF, Eastman MC, Hunt RF, Heinz AW. The safety and duration of non-operative treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Aust N Z J Surg. 1993;63(5):367–371.


Copyright © 2011 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Download PDF
  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

More in Pubmed

Navigate this Article