Slowing Global Warming: Benefits for Patients and the Planet



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2011 Aug 1;84(3):271-278.

  Related Editorial

  Patient information: See related handout on global warming, written by the author of this article.

  Related letters: Responses to Article on Benefits of Slowing Global Warming

Global warming will cause significant harm to the health of persons and their communities by compromising food and water supplies; increasing risks of morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases and heat stress; changing social determinants of health resulting from extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and expanding flood plains; and worsening air quality, resulting in additional morbidity and mortality from respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Vulnerable populations such as children, older persons, persons living at or below the poverty level, and minorities will be affected earliest and greatest, but everyone likely will be affected at some point. Family physicians can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions, stabilize the climate, and reduce the risks of climate change while also directly improving the health of their patients. Health interventions that have a beneficial effect on climate change include encouraging patients to reduce the amount of red meat in their diets and to replace some vehicular transportation with walking or bicycling. Patients are more likely to make such lifestyle changes if their physician asks them to and leads by example. Medical offices and hospitals can become more energy efficient by recycling, purchasing wind-generated electricity, and turning off appliances, computers, and lights when not in use. Moreover, physicians can play an important role in improving air quality and reducing greenhouse gas emissions by advocating for enforcement of existing air quality regulations and working with local and national policy makers to further improve air quality standards, thereby improving the health of their patients and slowing global climate change.

Global warming is an occurrence that is well documented, with average global surface temperatures now 1.5°F (0.83°C) higher than at the start of the industrial revolution.1 Since the 1970s, each decade has been warmer than the previous, and the 2000 through 2009 decade was the warmest on record.1

Changes in temperature alter wind, precipitation, and ocean current patterns across the world. Because climate is temperature-driven, scientists prefer the term “climate change” to “global warming.” The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, comprising more than 2,000 of the world's leading climate-change scientists, concluded in its 2007 consensus report that most of the increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century has resulted from an increase in human-generated greenhouse gas emissions, with a probability of greater than 90 percent.2 A review of the extensive scientific evidence for climate change is beyond the scope of this article, but, in addition to the consensus report,2 a 2009 report from The Lancet offers a comprehensive review of the science.3

Because humans are largely responsible for these climate changes, it is reasonable to suggest that persons could take actions necessary to stabilize the climate. Although that responsibility falls on everyone, physicians can make an important contribution by keeping informed about the impending adverse health effects of climate change; making specific health recommendations to their patients; reducing the environmental impact of their office and hospital practices; and serving as community spokespersons. Family physicians should join the growing global movement of scientists—as evidenced by the InterAcademy Medical Panel statement signed by 43 national academies of science, including the Institute of Medicine—that calls for policy makers to consider the negative health effects of global climate change and the positive health benefits of many mitigation strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.4

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendation Evidence rating References

Physicians should advise patients to reduce their dietary meat consumption, especially red meat, to improve individual health.

C

61, 62

Physicians should advise patients to reduce their dietary meat consumption, especially red meat, to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve public health.

C

63

Physicians should recommend that patients use more active transportation methods, such as walking and bicycling, to improve individual health.

C

66

Physicians should recommend that patients use more active transportation methods, such as walking and bicycling, to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve public health.

C

64, 65


A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

View Table

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendation Evidence rating References

Physicians should advise patients to reduce their dietary meat consumption, especially red meat, to improve individual health.

C

61, 62

Physicians should advise patients to reduce their dietary meat consumption, especially red meat, to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve public health.

C

63

Physicians should recommend that patients use more active transportation methods, such as walking and bicycling, to improve individual health.

C

66

Physicians should recommend that patients use more active transportation methods, such as walking and bicycling, to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve public health.

C

64, 65


A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

Health Effects of Climate Change

Recent estimates show that climate change already causes at least 300,000 deaths per year worldwide,5 and another report states that climate change could be the biggest global health threat of this century.3 If left unabated, climate change will cause many more deaths in the future. Although links between climate change and specific diseases have captured the attention of the health community, the indirect effects of climate change on food and water supplies pose the most serious threat to health.3  Table 1 summarizes the health risks of climate change.647

Table 1.

Potential Health Effects of Climate Change

Changes to food and water supplies

Food insecurity*6,7

Water insecurity*8,9

Increased risk of violent human conflict from scarce resources, forced migration1012

Increased risks to food safety (e.g., wildfires release mercury from peat bogs, resulting in increased bioaccumulation with fish consumption,13 shellfish poisoning14)

Extreme weather events (e.g., hurricanes, tornadoes, heavy precipitation, flooding, droughts) increase in severity and frequency

Chronic disease: increase in mortality from flooding in persons with chronic conditions such as diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, heart disease15

Wildfires: droughts leading to increases in forest and brush fires16

Infectious disease: outbreaks following extreme weather events, such as norovirus after Hurricane Katrina17; increased risk of waterborne infectious disease from flooding18

Injuries: drowning, blunt trauma19

Mental health: increased risk of depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, and behavioral problems in adults and children2022

Social determinants of health: jobs lost, care disrupted for chronic medical conditions, economic destruction, health care systems destroyed23

Heat stress from warmer temperatures

Heat waves: more frequent, more intense, and longer-lasting, leading to increased mortality in older persons, those with comorbid conditions (e.g., cardiac, pulmonary, immune, and nervous system diseases or disorders), and socially isolated persons24,25

Infectious disease risks increase

Spread of arbovirus infections such as West Nile virus, chikungunya virus26

Increased global incidence of dengue fever,27 spreading into Florida Keys28

Increased risk of cholera, carried on temperature-sensitive marine copepods29,30

Increased risk of foodborne disease from food sitting out; increased rate of pathogen growth31

Worsening air quality from greenhouse gases (ozone, carbon dioxide, nitrogen dioxide), particulate matter, pollen

Allergies: extended hay fever season and more severe allergic responses32,33; higher ozone concentrations combine with the urban heat island effect to cause higher pollen counts, especially from ragweed33

Cardiovascular outcomes: increased risk of myocardial infarction34

Diabetes: possible links with type 135 and type 236

Wildfires: release particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons that can be carcinogenic; respiratory irritants such as formaldehyde and acrolein; free radicals; trace gases; and radionuclides37

Mental health: higher rates of schizophrenia, anxiety, and depression38,39; increased risk of learning difficulties among children40; decreased sense of well-being41

Perinatal outcomes: possible links to higher rates of miscarriage, premature delivery, low-birth-weight infants42

Respiratory outcomes: increased risk of respiratory diseases such as asthma,4345 community-acquired pneumonia,46 lung cancer 47


*—Fear or anxiety about diminishing supplies of food or clean water.

Information from references 6 through 47.

Table 1.   Potential Health Effects of Climate Change

View Table

Table 1.

Potential Health Effects of Climate Change

Changes to food and water supplies

Food insecurity*6,7

Water insecurity*8,9

Increased risk of violent human conflict from scarce resources, forced migration1012

Increased risks to food safety (e.g., wildfires release mercury from peat bogs, resulting in increased bioaccumulation with fish consumption,13 shellfish poisoning14)

Extreme weather events (e.g., hurricanes, tornadoes, heavy precipitation, flooding, droughts) increase in severity and frequency

Chronic disease: increase in mortality from flooding in persons with chronic conditions such as diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, heart disease15

Wildfires: droughts leading to increases in forest and brush fires16

Infectious disease: outbreaks following extreme weather events, such as norovirus after Hurricane Katrina17; increased risk of waterborne infectious disease from flooding18

Injuries: drowning, blunt trauma19

Mental health: increased risk of depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, and behavioral problems in adults and children2022

Social determinants of health: jobs lost, care disrupted for chronic medical conditions, economic destruction, health care systems destroyed23

Heat stress from warmer temperatures

Heat waves: more frequent, more intense, and longer-lasting, leading to increased mortality in older persons, those with comorbid conditions (e.g., cardiac, pulmonary, immune, and nervous system diseases or disorders), and socially isolated persons24,25

Infectious disease risks increase

Spread of arbovirus infections such as West Nile virus, chikungunya virus26

Increased global incidence of dengue fever,27 spreading into Florida Keys28

Increased risk of cholera, carried on temperature-sensitive marine copepods29,30

Increased risk of foodborne disease from food sitting out; increased rate of pathogen growth31

Worsening air quality from greenhouse gases (ozone, carbon dioxide, nitrogen dioxide), particulate matter, pollen

Allergies: extended hay fever season and more severe allergic responses32,33; higher ozone concentrations combine with the urban heat island effect to cause higher pollen counts, especially from ragweed33

Cardiovascular outcomes: increased risk of myocardial infarction34

Diabetes: possible links with type 135 and type 236

Wildfires: release particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons that can be carcinogenic; respiratory irritants such as formaldehyde and acrolein; free radicals; trace gases; and radionuclides37

Mental health: higher rates of schizophrenia, anxiety, and depression38,39; increased risk of learning difficulties among children40; decreased sense of well-being41

Perinatal outcomes: possible links to higher rates of miscarriage, premature delivery, low-birth-weight infants42

Respiratory outcomes: increased risk of respiratory diseases such as asthma,4345 community-acquired pneumonia,46 lung cancer 47


*—Fear or anxiety about diminishing supplies of food or clean water.

Information from references 6 through 47.

CHANGES TO FOOD AND WATER SUPPLIES

The health of any person or community depends on having adequate supplies of clean water and nutritious food. Warmer temperatures and more erratic weather would change crop growth patterns and may cause food shortages and/or substantial price increases. Water shortages would limit agriculture, whereas changes in the timing of natural events (e.g., spring flowering) may disrupt natural cycles, including the timing of when pollinating insects emerge. Changes in temperature and precipitation may allow pests and plant diseases to flourish, resulting in greater crop losses and/or greater use of pesticides, thereby increasing the risk of pesticide contamination and poisonings.48

More frequent and severe droughts and floods also are projected to occur in a warmer climate, threatening many U.S. water supplies. In general, dry areas are projected to get drier. Wet areas will likely get more precipitation, but more of that may come in the form of heavy precipitation events, leading to greater runoff, flooding, and longer stretches of drought between events. Some areas, such as the Southwest, are already experiencing unprecedented droughts and water shortages that will likely worsen.2 Substantial increases in food prices are expected, resulting in more Americans being undernourished and food insecure (i.e., experiencing fear or anxiety about the possibility of their food supply becoming insufficient). Globally, the most severe and life-threatening health effect of increasing water shortages will be famine caused by crop failure.

EXTREME WEATHER

More severe and possibly more frequent hurricanes, tornadoes, and heavy precipitation events—such as the recent snow storms in the mid-Atlantic, flooding in the Northeast, and the record number and strength of tornadoes in the Midwest—are projected as a result of climate change.2 Coastal and inland flood zones are expected to expand with more frequent so-called “500-year floods,” similar to what Tennessee experienced in May 2010 when more than 13 inches of rain fell in less than 36 hours,49 and the record-breaking Mississippi River flooding in May 2011. Flooding presents immediate risks of drowning, blunt trauma, and infectious disease.

Moreover, extreme weather events can transform the social determinants of health, resulting in increased risks of physical and mental illness.50 After Hurricane Katrina, for example, many persons lost their jobs and then their health insurance; health care for chronic diseases was disrupted; medications were difficult to get; family and social support networks were dispersed; housing was scarce; and regular routines, such as school for children, were disrupted. All of these contributed to worsening physical and mental health indicators for Gulf Coast residents.23,51

HEAT STRESS

Climate change is expected to increase the number and severity of heat waves around the world. Heat waves, like those in Western Europe that killed more than 45,000 persons in the summer of 2003, could come as often as every other year by 2040 with unchecked climate change.52,53 The Chicago heat wave of 1995 caused 700 deaths,25 and more than 300 people died during the California heat wave in 2006.54 Social isolation is the greatest risk for morbidity and mortality during heat waves.52 Adverse mental health effects of heat stress range from increased emergency department visits for those with mental illness to the association of increased aggression and resulting increases in violent crime.55,56

Urban areas, which have large quantities of cement and asphalt, ensure higher temperatures during the day and reradiate that heat at night, keeping nighttime temperatures high and preventing people from cooling and rejuvenating at night. This is known as the urban heat island effect.57

INFECTIOUS DISEASE

With warmer temperatures, some infectious diseases, such as those carried by food and water, may become more of a problem. Warmer temperatures will also allow disease-carrying insects to expand their ranges, reproduce more successfully, and be more effective disease vectors.19 West Nile virus, for example, was brought to the United States in 2002 by globalization, but climate change was instrumental in its rapid spread across the country.26

WORSENING AIR QUALITY

Most air pollutants are also greenhouse gases that propel climate change, and climate change causes worsening air quality, creating a positive feedback loop that is particularly harmful to patients with respiratory or cardiovascular illnesses. Ozone, a primary component of smog, is one such greenhouse gas. As temperatures increase, concentrations of ozone also increase, worsening symptoms for the 9 percent of American children who have asthma.58 Almost one-half of the U.S. population lives in areas with ozone concentrations higher than the Environmental Protection Agency recommends.59 One study demonstrated that healthy children who played three or more outdoor sports in towns with higher ozone concentrations were three times more likely to develop asthma than those who lived in towns with lower ozone concentrations.44

Recommendations

Family physicians already play an important role in recommending lifestyle changes to combat obesity, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and other health conditions. Two of the health-related changes for improving these conditions are also tied to reducing carbon emissions: decreasing red meat consumption and, when feasible, replacing vehicular travel with active forms of transportation such as walking and biking. By focusing on just those two areas, physicians can help stabilize the climate and improve their patients' health. Tackling each of these, however, requires different methods.

RED MEAT CONSUMPTION

Climate change affects food production, and vice versa. Surprising to many, livestock production contributes one-fifth of all greenhouse gas emissions globally, and global meat consumption is expected to double by the year 2050.60 The average American currently consumes 270 pounds of meat per year.60 For health and the climate, Americans should decrease their average daily meat consumption from 12 oz per day to 3 oz per day (about the size of a regular hamburger patty), with red meat making up less than one-half of their total meat consumption.6163 Physicians' comments can be instrumental in reducing their patients' meat consumption (Figure 12,19,31,61,62) . The Meatless Monday campaign provides useful tips for getting started (Table 2).

Environmental and Health Benefits of Reducing Dietary Red Meat

Figure 1.

Diagram of the benefits to health and global climate change from reducing consumption of red meat.

Information from references 2,19,31,61, and 62.

View Large

Environmental and Health Benefits of Reducing Dietary Red Meat


Figure 1.

Diagram of the benefits to health and global climate change from reducing consumption of red meat.

Information from references 2,19,31,61, and 62.

Environmental and Health Benefits of Reducing Dietary Red Meat


Figure 1.

Diagram of the benefits to health and global climate change from reducing consumption of red meat.

Information from references 2,19,31,61, and 62.

Table 2.

Online Resources for Climate Change Information and Recommendations

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Web site: http://www.cdc.gov/climatechange

Includes articles on climate change, links to other resources (e.g., webcast on climate change and public health, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Web site [the leading scientific body on climate change])

Climate and Health Council

Web site: http://www.climateandhealth.org

Includes “Ten Practical Actions for Doctors” and additional resources for physicians and patients

Energy Star for Healthcare

Web site: http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=healthcare.bus_healthcare

Has practical resources to help hospitals and medical practices save energy and money without compromising patient care

Environmental Protection Agency

Web site: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange

Comprehensive site with scientific links and practical resources; could be used as a patient reference, also links to their climate change for kids Web site

Green Doctor Office Program

Web site: http://www.mygreendoctor.org

Practical approach from the Florida Medical Association to help medical offices “go green”; registration of the medical practice is necessary to gain access to the information, but there is no charge to do so and Florida Medical Association membership is not required

Health Care Without Harm

Web site: http://www.noharm.org

Provides information on how the health care industry is linked to climate change; addresses topics such as toxic materials, a safer food system, climate and health, green purchasing, and green building and energy

The Lancet

Web site: http://www.thelancet.com/series/health-and-climate-change [registration required]

Series of articles, resources on health and climate change

Meatless Monday

Web site: http://www.meatlessmonday.com

Recommendations and ideas for cutting meat out of the diet one day per week; includes resources for meatless recipes

Pew Center on Global Climate Change

Web site: http://www.pewclimate.org

Provides information on the science of climate change; links to statewide map showing each state's climate change policy

Prescription for a Healthy Planet

Web site: http://www.climateandhealthcare.org

Includes links to useful resources for health care professionals

Table 2.   Online Resources for Climate Change Information and Recommendations

View Table

Table 2.

Online Resources for Climate Change Information and Recommendations

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Web site: http://www.cdc.gov/climatechange

Includes articles on climate change, links to other resources (e.g., webcast on climate change and public health, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Web site [the leading scientific body on climate change])

Climate and Health Council

Web site: http://www.climateandhealth.org

Includes “Ten Practical Actions for Doctors” and additional resources for physicians and patients

Energy Star for Healthcare

Web site: http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=healthcare.bus_healthcare

Has practical resources to help hospitals and medical practices save energy and money without compromising patient care

Environmental Protection Agency

Web site: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange

Comprehensive site with scientific links and practical resources; could be used as a patient reference, also links to their climate change for kids Web site

Green Doctor Office Program

Web site: http://www.mygreendoctor.org

Practical approach from the Florida Medical Association to help medical offices “go green”; registration of the medical practice is necessary to gain access to the information, but there is no charge to do so and Florida Medical Association membership is not required

Health Care Without Harm

Web site: http://www.noharm.org

Provides information on how the health care industry is linked to climate change; addresses topics such as toxic materials, a safer food system, climate and health, green purchasing, and green building and energy

The Lancet

Web site: http://www.thelancet.com/series/health-and-climate-change [registration required]

Series of articles, resources on health and climate change

Meatless Monday

Web site: http://www.meatlessmonday.com

Recommendations and ideas for cutting meat out of the diet one day per week; includes resources for meatless recipes

Pew Center on Global Climate Change

Web site: http://www.pewclimate.org

Provides information on the science of climate change; links to statewide map showing each state's climate change policy

Prescription for a Healthy Planet

Web site: http://www.climateandhealthcare.org

Includes links to useful resources for health care professionals

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

Climate-changing greenhouse gases contribute to worsening air pollution. When car travel restrictions reduced morning traffic by 23 percent during the 17 days of the 1996 summer Olympic games in Atlanta, Ga., ozone concentrations decreased 28 percent and acute care visits for asthma decreased 41 percent.64 Results were similar in Beijing, China, during the 2008 Olympic games when the most polluting vehicles were disallowed completely and private automobile drivers were only allowed to drive on alternate days, which reduced greenhouse gas emissions and made for healthier residents.65

Physicians could offer recommendations for their patients to forego shorter car trips in favor of bicycling or walking, which benefits individual health and improves air quality 66 (Figure 23439,41,42,6466). Although evidence for the effectiveness of lifestyle counseling in the context of climate change is lacking, messages from family physicians about behavior change could have positive effects on patients' health and the climate. Even in a typically busy family practice office, a physician could hand a pamphlet to a patient and say, “I believe this is important to your health and our community. Please take a look at this and consider which of these actions you could take.” Attractive posters or television monitors playing an informational video or DVD in the waiting rooms could deliver climate change health messages without taking time away from more traditional health care services.

Health Benefits of Climate Change Advocacy by Physicians

Figure 2.

Diagram showing the health benefits of physician advocacy for climate change interventions at the patient and community levels.

Information from references 34 through 39,41,42, and 64 through 66.

View Large

Health Benefits of Climate Change Advocacy by Physicians


Figure 2.

Diagram showing the health benefits of physician advocacy for climate change interventions at the patient and community levels.

Information from references 34 through 39,41,42, and 64 through 66.

Health Benefits of Climate Change Advocacy by Physicians


Figure 2.

Diagram showing the health benefits of physician advocacy for climate change interventions at the patient and community levels.

Information from references 34 through 39,41,42, and 64 through 66.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF OFFICE AND HOSPITAL PRACTICES

Resources are available to assist physicians in making their clinic sites “greener,” and in making personal lifestyle changes that help reduce climate change (Table 2). Medical offices and hospitals can help by recycling; using recycled items and Energy Star certified appliances and computers; minimizing waste and waste transport by replacing single-use items with sterilizable or washable items; purchasing wind-generated electricity; and reducing energy use by turning off appliances, computers, and lights when not in use. In 2008, the U.S. health care sector spent $8.8 billion on energy to meet patient needs, not including the transportation of employees or patients to and from health care facilities, resulting in 8 percent of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.67,68 The Energy Star for Healthcare program run by the Environmental Protection Agency assists medical offices in saving money by using energy more efficiently.68

PHYSICIAN ADVOCACY

To accomplish significant reductions in emissions and concomitantly improve health, physicians will have an even greater effect if they also get involved in changing policy (Figure 23439,41,42,6466). One study estimated that by complying with current air pollution standards, nearly 4,000 premature deaths, 2,800 hospitalizations, and 140,000 asthma attacks could be avoided in parts of Southern California, saving the state $28 billion in health care costs and lost work annually.69

Physicians can play an important role in encouraging enforcement of regulations and strengthening air quality standards. They can motivate local medical societies to pass resolutions on the health dangers of air pollution and global climate change, and to publicly support state or federal legislation that would enforce health-based air quality standards. Talking to policy makers in person or by telephone to educate them about these health effects and testifying about the health effects at local council meetings and state legislatures sends a powerful message to lawmakers that they cannot ignore these issues because their constituents' health, and not just the environment, is at stake.

Final Comment

Although climate change is not typically considered a clinical problem, it will affect all patients and communities. Patients likely will feel the effects within their lifetimes, and their children definitely will. More concerning than a slow, gradual rise in average global surface temperature is the possibility of abrupt climate change, which would rapidly take the climate to a warmer state that could cause faster melting of polar ice caps and a dramatic rise in sea level.2 Therein lies the urgency to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible. Family physicians, through patient counseling, personal initiative, and advocacy, can be at the forefront of addressing this vital public health issue.

The Author

CINDY L. PARKER, MD, MPH, is codirector of the Program on Global Sustainability and Health at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md. She is also director of the university's Global Environmental Change and Sustainability major and minor.

Address correspondence to Cindy L. Parker, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., W7033, Baltimore, MD 21205 (e-mail: ciparker@jhsph.edu). Reprints are not available from the author.

The author thanks Jane L. Andrews, MPH, for her contributions to the article.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations to disclose.

REFERENCES

1. Earth Science Communications Team. Global climate change: NASA's eyes on the Earth. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology. http://climate.nasa.gov/. Accessed April 3, 2011.

2. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, et al. Technical summary. In: Solomon S. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2007. http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ts.html. Accessed April 3, 2011.

3. Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, et al. Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission [published correction appears in Lancet. 2009;373(9682):2200]. Lancet. 2009;373(9676):1693–1733.

4. Statement on the health co-benefits of policies to tackle climate change. Trieste, Italy: InterAcademy Medical Panel; 2010. http://www.iamp-online.org/statements/folder.2010-10-28.2528597573/health-benefits-of-climate-change-mitigation.pdf. Accessed April 3, 2011. Statement on the health co-benefits of policies to tackle climate change Trieste,

5. Global Humanitarian Forum. The anatomy of a silent crisis. Human impact report. Geneva, Switzerland: Global Humanitarian Forum; 2009.

6. Lobell DB, Field CB. Global scale climate—crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environ Res Lett. 2007;2(1):014002.

7. Cline WR. Global warming and agriculture: impact estimates by country. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development, Peterson Institute for International Economics; 2007.

8. Postel SL. Entering an era of water scarcity: the challenges ahead. Ecol Appl. 2000;10(4):941–948.

9. Mote PW. Climate-driven variability and trends in mountain snowpack in western North America. J Clim. 2006;19(23):6209–6220.

10. Richter ED, Blum R, Berman T, Stanton GH. Malthusian pressures, genocide, and ecocide. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2007;13(3):331–341.

11. Homer-Dixon T. Strategies for studying causation in complex ecological-political systems. J Environ Dev. 1996;5(2):132–148.

12. Homer-Dixon TF. Environmental scarcities and violent conflict: evidence from cases. Int Secur. 1994;19(1):5–40.

13. Turetsky MR, Harden JW, Friedli HR, et al. Wildfires threaten mercury stocks in northern soils. Geophys Res Lett. 2006;33L16403.

14. McLaughlin JB, DePaola A, Bopp CA, et al. Outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus gastroenteritis associated with Alaskan oysters. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(14):1463–1470.

15. Ahern M, Kovats RS, Wilkinson P, Few R, Matthies F. Global health impacts of floods: epidemiologic evidence. Epidemiol Rev. 2005;2736–46.

16. Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW. Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity. Science. 2006;313(5789):940–943.

17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Norovirus outbreak among evacuees from hurricane Katrina—Houston, Texas, September 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54(40):1016–1018.

18. Curriero FC, Patz JA, Rose JB, Lele S. The association between extreme precipitation and waterborne disease outbreaks in the United States, 1948–1994. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(8):1194–1199.

19. Confalonieri U, Menne B, Akhtar R, et al. 2007: Human health. In: Parry M. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2007:391–431.

20. Abramson DM, Garfield RS, Redlener I. The recovery divide: poverty and the widening gap among Mississippi children and families affected by Hurricane Katrina: a report of the Mississippi Child and Family Health Study, based on an August 2006 household survey of displaced and impacted families living in Mississippi. New York, NY: National Center for Disaster Preparedness, The Children's Health Fund; 2007.

21. Kessler RC, Galea S, Jones RT, Parker HA; Hurricane Katrina Community Advisory Group. Mental illness and suicidality after Hurricane Katrina. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84(12):930–939.

22. Galea S, Brewin CR, Gruber M, et al. Exposure to hurricane-related stressors and mental illness after Hurricane Katrina. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(12):1427–1434.

23. Kessler RC; Hurricane Katrina Community Advisory Group. Hurricane Katrina's impact on the care of survivors with chronic medical conditions. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(9):1225–1230.

24. Belmin J, Auffray JC, Berbezier C, et al. Level of dependency: a simple marker associated with mortality during the 2003 heatwave among French dependent elderly people living in the community or in institutions. Age Ageing. 2007;36(3):298–303.

25. Semenza JC, Rubin CH, Falter KH, et al. Heat-related deaths during the July 1995 heat wave in Chicago. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(2):84–90.

26. Weaver SC, Reisen WK. Present and future arboviral threats. Antiviral Res. 2010;85(2):328–345.

27. Hales S, de Wet N, Maindonald J, Woodward A. Potential effect of population and climate changes on global distribution of dengue fever: an empirical model. Lancet. 2002;360(9336):830–834.

28. Voelker R. Race is on for effective dengue vaccine. JAMA. 2010;304(13):1430–1431.

29. Colwell RR. Infectious disease and environment: cholera as a paradigm for waterborne disease. Int Microbiol. 2004;7(4):285–289.

30. Louis VR, Gillespie IA, O'Brien SJ, Russek-Cohen E, Pearson AD, Colwell RR. Temperature-driven campylobacter seasonality in England and Wales. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(1):85–92.

31. Kovats RS, Edwards SJ, Hajat S, Armstrong BG, Ebi KL, Menne B. The effect of temperature on food poisoning: a time-series analysis of salmonellosis in ten European countries. Epidemiol Infect. 2004;132(3):443–453.

32. Ziska LH, Gebhard DE, Frenz DA, Faulkner S, Singer BD, Straka JG. Cities as harbingers of climate change: common ragweed, urbanization, and public health. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111(2):290–295.

33. Beggs PJ. Impacts of climate change on aeroallergens: past and future. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004;34(10):1507–1513.

34. Maitre A, Bonneterre V, Huillard L, Sabatier P, de Gaudemaris R. Impact of urban atmospheric pollution on coronary disease. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(19):2275–2284.

35. Hathout EH, Beeson WL, Ischander M, Rao R, Mace JW. Air pollution and type 1 diabetes in children. Pediatr Diabetes. 2006;7(2):81–87.

36. Bhatnagar A. Could dirty air cause diabetes? Circulation. 2009;119(4):492–494.

37. Stefanidou M, Athanaselis S, Spiliopoulou C. Health impacts of fire smoke inhalation. Inhal Toxicol. 2008;20(8):761–766.

38. Pedersen CB, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Hertel O, Mortensen PB. Air pollution from traffic and schizophrenia risk. Schizophr Res. 2004;66(1):83–85.

39. Jacobs SV, Evans GW, Catalano R, Dooley D. Air pollution and depressive symptomatology: exploratory analyses of intervening psychosocial factors. Popul Environ. 1984;7(4):260–272.

40. Margai F, Henry N. A community-based assessment of learning disabilities using environmental and contextual risk factors. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(5):1073–1085.

41. Yamazaki S, Nitta H, Fukuhara S. Associations between exposure to ambient photochemical oxidants and the vitality or mental health domain of the health related quality of life. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(2):173–179.

42. Schwartz J. Air pollution and children's health. Pediatrics. 2004;113(4 suppl):1037–1043.

43. Kim JJ, Huen K, Adams S, et al. Residential traffic and children's respiratory health. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(9):1274–1279.

44. McConnell R, Berhane K, Gilliland F, et al. Asthma in exercising children exposed to ozone: a cohort study [published correction appears in Lancet. 2002;359(9309): 896]. Lancet. 2002;359(9304):386–391.

45. Gent JF, Triche EW, Holford TR, et al. Association of low-level ozone and fine particles with respiratory symptoms in children with asthma. JAMA. 2003;290(14):1859–1867.

46. Neupane B, Jerrett M, Burnett RT, Marrie T, Arain A, Loeb M. Long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and risk of hospitalization with community-acquired pneumonia in older adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181(1):47–53.

47. Krewski D, Burnett R, Jerrett M, et al. Mortality and long-term exposure to ambient air pollution: ongoing analyses based on the American Cancer Society cohort. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2005;68(13–14):1093–1109.

48. Chen C, McCarl BA. An investigation of the relationship between pesticide usage and climate change. Clim Change. 2001;50(4):475–487.

49. National Weather Service. May 1 & 2 2010 epic flood event for western and middle Tennessee. http://www.srh.noaa.gov/ohx/?n=may2010epicfloodevent. Accessed November 28, 2010.

50. Glass TA, McAtee MJ. Behavioral science at the crossroads in public health: extending horizons, envisioning the future. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(7):1650–1671.

51. Abramson DM, Garfield RS. On the edge: children and families displaced by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita face a looming medical and mental health crisis. New York, NY: Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health; 2006.

52. Kosatsky T. The 2003 European heat waves. Euro Surveill. 2005;10(7):148–149.

53. Stott PA, Stone DA, Allen MR. Human contribution to the European heatwave of 2003 [published correction appears in Nature. 2005;436(7054):1200]. Nature. 2004;432(7017):610–614.

54. Ostro BD, Roth LA, Green RS, Basu R. Estimating the mortality effect of the July 2006 California heat wave. Environ Res. 2009;109(5):614–619.

55. Bulbena A, Sperry L, Cunillera J. Psychiatric effects of heat waves. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57(10):1519.

56. Bell PA. Reanalysis and perspective in the heat- aggression debate. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;89(1):71–73.

57. O'Neill MS, Ebi KL. Temperature extremes and health: impacts of climate variability and change in the United States. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51(1):13–25.

58. Akinbami L; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. The state of childhood asthma, United States, 1980–2005. Adv Data. 2006;(381):1–24.

59. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Our nation's air: status and trends through 2008. http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/2010/. Accessed August 19, 2010.

60. Steinfeld H. Livestock's long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2006.

61. Walker C, Reamy BV. Diets for cardiovascular disease prevention: what is the evidence? Am Fam Physician. 2009;79(7):571–578.

62. Lindbloom EJ. Long-term benefits of a vegetarian diet. Am Fam Physician. 2009;79(7):541–542.

63. McMichael AJ, Powles JW, Butler CD, Uauy R. Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health. Lancet. 2007;370(9594):1253–1263.

64. Friedman MS, Powell KE, Hutwagner L, Graham LM, Teague WG. Impact of changes in transportation and commuting behaviors during the 1996 Summer Olympic Games in Atlanta on air quality and childhood asthma. JAMA. 2001;285(7):897–905.

65. Li Y, Wang W, Wang J, Zhang X, Lin W, Yang Y. Impact of air pollution control measures and weather conditions on asthma during the 2008 Summer Olympic Games in Beijing [published ahead of print November 16, 2010]. Int J Biometeorol. http://www.springerlink.com/content/f4j883u210t72263/. Accessed April 3, 2011.

66. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee report, 2008: to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.

67. Chung JW, Meltzer DO. Estimate of the carbon footprint of the US health care sector. JAMA. 2009;302(18):1970–1972.

68. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Energy Star for Healthcare. http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=healthcare.bus_healthcare. Accessed December 24, 2010.

69. Hall JV, Brajer V, Lurmann FW. The benefits of meeting federal clean air standards in the South Coast and San Joaquin Valley air basins. Fullerton, Calif.: California State University; 2008.



Copyright © 2011 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Download PDF
  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

More in AFP

More in Pubmed

Navigate this Article