Evaluating Acutely Injured Patients for Internal Derangement of the Knee



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Although historical findings have some value in diagnosing internal derangement of the knee, a thorough physical examination can often rule out fracture and ligamentous and meniscal injuries. The Ottawa Knee Rule can help physicians determine which patients require radiography. Positive physical examination tests and findings of acute effusion suggest internal derangement. An abnormal McMurray or Thessaly test strongly suggests meniscal injury, whereas a normal Thessaly test may rule out meniscal injury. Absence of evidence of joint effusion significantly decreases the probability of internal derangement. Magnetic resonance imaging should be reserved for ruling out internal derangement in patients with suggestive historical and physical examination findings.

Nearly one-half of adults will experience knee pain at some point in their lives.1 Primary care physicians in the United States evaluate knee pain during approximately 4 million office visits each year, and knee symptoms are the 10th most common reason for outpatient visits.2 Although most episodes of knee pain in primary care patients are caused by osteoarthritis, many patients have acute injuries. Approximately 9 to 10 percent of patients with acute knee pain who are treated by family physicians have meniscal tears, 7 percent have collateral ligament injury, and about 4 percent have a cruciate ligament injury 2,3 (Figure 14).

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendation Evidence rating References

The Ottawa Knee Rule should be used to determine which patients with acute knee injury require radiography.

A

5, 6, 811

Further testing is not immediately needed in patients with knee injury who have negative physical examination findings, although close clinical follow-up is required.

C

3, 20, 23

In patients with suspected meniscal injury, the Thessaly test is preferred over the McMurray test and evaluation for joint line tenderness.

C

15, 27

Internal derangement should be suspected in patients with knee trauma and effusion.

C

16, 28


A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

View Table

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendation Evidence rating References

The Ottawa Knee Rule should be used to determine which patients with acute knee injury require radiography.

A

5, 6, 811

Further testing is not immediately needed in patients with knee injury who have negative physical examination findings, although close clinical follow-up is required.

C

3, 20, 23

In patients with suspected meniscal injury, the Thessaly test is preferred over the McMurray test and evaluation for joint line tenderness.

C

15, 27

Internal derangement should be suspected in patients with knee trauma and effusion.

C

16, 28


A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

Figure 1.

Anterior view of the osseous, ligamentous, and fibrocartilaginous structures of the knee.

Reprinted with permission from Tandeter HB, Shvartzman P. Acute knee injuries: use of decision rules for selective radiograph ordering. Am Fam Physician. 1999;60(9):2600.

View Large


Figure 1.

Anterior view of the osseous, ligamentous, and fibrocartilaginous structures of the knee.

Reprinted with permission from Tandeter HB, Shvartzman P. Acute knee injuries: use of decision rules for selective radiograph ordering. Am Fam Physician. 1999;60(9):2600.


Figure 1.

Anterior view of the osseous, ligamentous, and fibrocartilaginous structures of the knee.

Reprinted with permission from Tandeter HB, Shvartzman P. Acute knee injuries: use of decision rules for selective radiograph ordering. Am Fam Physician. 1999;60(9):2600.

Because approximately one-third of patients with knee pain seek care from their primary care physician,1 it is important to be aware of the signs and symptoms associated with internal derangement of the knee (i.e., fracture, ligamentous injury, or meniscal tear). The primary role of the family physician in early evaluation of knee injury is to identify patients in need of referral for possible surgical intervention. If internal derangement and other acute external knee injuries (e.g., patellar subluxation, patellar tendon rupture) can be ruled out, the patient can be reassured that symptoms will likely resolve with conservative treatment (i.e., rest, ice, compression, elevation, and pain control).

Fracture

ILLUSTRATIVE CASE

A 52-year-old woman presents to the emergency department for evaluation of knee pain that began after a car crash. Her right knee struck the dashboard during a head-on collision. She was not able to walk immediately after the crash. Examination reveals a large effusion. The patient is not able flex the knee to 90 degrees, and she cannot bear weight on the leg. Radiography reveals a depressed tibial plateau fracture.

It is essential to accurately diagnose knee fractures while simultaneously using resources judiciously. Knee radiography is the most common imaging modality performed for trauma in the emergency department setting, but it has the lowest yield for diagnosing clinically significant fractures.5

The Ottawa Knee Rule can guide appropriate use of radiography at the point of care based on easily obtainable clinical information6  (Table 157). It has been repeatedly validated811 and decreases radiography utilization by 28 to 35 percent.9,10 The rule is 98.5 to 100 percent sensitive (i.e., it will detect almost all patients with fracture), and it has a specificity of 49 percent.9 If the prevalence (pretest probability) of fracture is 11 percent in the emergency department setting, the likelihood of fracture in a patient with any of the Ottawa Knee Rule criteria is approximately 20 percent, whereas in those with none of the Ottawa criteria, fracture can be ruled out based on clinical findings alone (approximately 1 percent chance of fracture).9 In the outpatient primary care setting, where the prevalence of fracture is only 2 percent, the probability of fracture in patients with a negative Ottawa Knee Rule evaluation is extremely low.

Table 1.

Indications for Radiography in Patients with Acute Knee Injury

Indication American College of Radiology criteria5 Ottawa Knee Rule6 Pittsburgh Knee Rule7

Age < 12 years or > 50 years

X

Age ≥ 55 years

X

Altered mental status

X

Fall or blunt trauma

X

Inability to bear weight for four steps (unable to transfer weight twice) immediately after injury or in the emergency setting

X

X

X

Inability to flex knee to 90 degrees

X

X

Joint effusion within 24 hours of a direct blow or fall

X

Tenderness over head of fibula or isolated to patella without other bony tenderness

X

X


Information from references 5 through 7.

Table 1.   Indications for Radiography in Patients with Acute Knee Injury

View Table

Table 1.

Indications for Radiography in Patients with Acute Knee Injury

Indication American College of Radiology criteria5 Ottawa Knee Rule6 Pittsburgh Knee Rule7

Age < 12 years or > 50 years

X

Age ≥ 55 years

X

Altered mental status

X

Fall or blunt trauma

X

Inability to bear weight for four steps (unable to transfer weight twice) immediately after injury or in the emergency setting

X

X

X

Inability to flex knee to 90 degrees

X

X

Joint effusion within 24 hours of a direct blow or fall

X

Tenderness over head of fibula or isolated to patella without other bony tenderness

X

X


Information from references 5 through 7.

The American College of Radiology has published recommendations for use of knee radiography in patients who have acute knee trauma.5 Although the recommendations have not been prospectively validated, they are similar to the Ottawa Knee Rule criteria. They recommend against radiography in patients (excluding infants) who can walk without a limp or who have a twisting injury and no effusion. The Pittsburgh Knee Rule criteria include blunt trauma or fall as the mechanism of injury, age younger than 12 years or older than 50 years, and inability to walk as independent predictors of fracture.7 A prospective validation trial comparing the Ottawa and Pittsburgh criteria showed that each rule is sensitive (97 to 100 percent of fractures found), but that the Pittsburgh rule is more specific (60 versus 27 percent for the Ottawa rule).12

Ligamentous Injury

ILLUSTRATIVE CASE

An 18-year-old high school basketball player presents the morning after sustaining a left knee injury during a game. An opposing player fell while rebounding the ball, striking the anterior aspect of the patient's tibia and forcing the femur to slide posteriorly on the tibia. The patient reports that he heard a pop, and that the knee immediately became swollen. He was unable to bear weight after the injury and is not able to take four steps in your office. Knee radiography is negative for fracture. Anterior drawer and Lachman tests are positive; the patient cannot tolerate a pivot shift test. Arthrocentesis reveals a large hemarthrosis.

No systematic review has addressed the diagnostic accuracy of physical examination findings in patients with collateral ligament injuries.3,13 Tenderness along the course of the ligament with reproduction of pain with valgus or varus force may be helpful. Visual inspection for differences in appearance between symptomatic and asymptomatic knees may also be revealing.

Historically, patients with ligamentous injury often have forceful stresses applied to the joint while bearing weight. They may hear or feel a popping sensation, and often note immediate swelling. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury accounts for more than 70 percent of acute hemarthroses in young athletes.14

The Lachman, anterior drawer, and pivot shift tests are common maneuvers used to examine the knee for internal derangement from ligamentous injury (Table 2 3,15,16  and Table 3 3,1517). The acute swelling that can accompany injuries may make the initial physical examination difficult, so repeated examination may be necessary. The pivot shift test has a greater positive predictive value (i.e., a positive test is helpful for ruling in injury), whereas the Lachman test has a better negative predictive value (i.e., a negative test is helpful for ruling out injury).3

Table 2.

Physical Examination Maneuvers for the Knee

Test Description Video link

Anterior cruciate ligament tear

Anterior drawer test3

With the patient supine on the examining table, flex the hip to 45 degrees and the knee to 90 degrees. Sit on the dorsum of the foot, wrap hands around the hamstrings (ensuring that these muscles are relaxed), then pull and push the proximal part of the leg, testing the movement of the tibia on the femur. Do these maneuvers in three positions of tibial rotation: neutral, 30 degrees externally rotated, and 30 degrees internally rotated. A normal test result is no more than 6 to 8 mm of laxity.

http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/publications/journals/afp/afp-oct-15-videos.html

Lachman test3

With the patient supine on the examining table and the leg at the examiner's side, slightly externally rotated and flexed (20 to 30 degrees), stabilize the femur with one hand and apply pressure to the back of the knee with the other hand, with the thumb on the joint line. A positive test result is movement of the knee with a soft or mushy end point.

http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/publications/journals/afp/afp-oct-15-videos.html

Pivot shift test3

Fully extend the knee and rotate the foot internally. Apply a valgus (abduction) force while progressively flexing the knee, watching and feeling for translation of the tibia on the femur.

http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/publications/journals/afp/afp-oct-15-videos.html

Meniscal tear

Joint line tenderness3

Palpate medially or laterally along the knee to the joint line between the femur and tibial condyles. Pain on palpation is a positive finding.

McMurray test3

Flex the hip and knee maximally. Apply a valgus (abduction) force to the knee while externally rotating the foot and passively extending the knee. An audible or palpable snap during extension suggests a tear of the medial meniscus. For the lateral meniscus, apply a varus (adduction) stress during internal rotation of the foot and passive extension of the knee.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohSzjNj-KCA&NR=1

Thessaly test15

Hold patient's outstretched hands while he or she stands flat-footed on the floor, internally and externally rotating three times with the knee flexed 20 degrees.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3oXDvagnic

Effusion

Ballottement test16

Push the patella posteriorly with two or three fingers using a quick, sharp motion. In the presence of a large effusion, the patella descends to the trochlea, strikes it with a distinct impact, and flows back to its former position.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=oULBAyfwkaE


Information from references 3, 15, and 16.

Table 2.   Physical Examination Maneuvers for the Knee

View Table

Table 2.

Physical Examination Maneuvers for the Knee

Test Description Video link

Anterior cruciate ligament tear

Anterior drawer test3

With the patient supine on the examining table, flex the hip to 45 degrees and the knee to 90 degrees. Sit on the dorsum of the foot, wrap hands around the hamstrings (ensuring that these muscles are relaxed), then pull and push the proximal part of the leg, testing the movement of the tibia on the femur. Do these maneuvers in three positions of tibial rotation: neutral, 30 degrees externally rotated, and 30 degrees internally rotated. A normal test result is no more than 6 to 8 mm of laxity.

http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/publications/journals/afp/afp-oct-15-videos.html

Lachman test3

With the patient supine on the examining table and the leg at the examiner's side, slightly externally rotated and flexed (20 to 30 degrees), stabilize the femur with one hand and apply pressure to the back of the knee with the other hand, with the thumb on the joint line. A positive test result is movement of the knee with a soft or mushy end point.

http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/publications/journals/afp/afp-oct-15-videos.html

Pivot shift test3

Fully extend the knee and rotate the foot internally. Apply a valgus (abduction) force while progressively flexing the knee, watching and feeling for translation of the tibia on the femur.

http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/publications/journals/afp/afp-oct-15-videos.html

Meniscal tear

Joint line tenderness3

Palpate medially or laterally along the knee to the joint line between the femur and tibial condyles. Pain on palpation is a positive finding.

McMurray test3

Flex the hip and knee maximally. Apply a valgus (abduction) force to the knee while externally rotating the foot and passively extending the knee. An audible or palpable snap during extension suggests a tear of the medial meniscus. For the lateral meniscus, apply a varus (adduction) stress during internal rotation of the foot and passive extension of the knee.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohSzjNj-KCA&NR=1

Thessaly test15

Hold patient's outstretched hands while he or she stands flat-footed on the floor, internally and externally rotating three times with the knee flexed 20 degrees.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3oXDvagnic

Effusion

Ballottement test16

Push the patella posteriorly with two or three fingers using a quick, sharp motion. In the presence of a large effusion, the patella descends to the trochlea, strikes it with a distinct impact, and flows back to its former position.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=oULBAyfwkaE


Information from references 3, 15, and 16.

Table 3.

Knee Injury: Diagnostic Accuracy of Physical Examination Maneuvers and Clinical Findings

Maneuver or clinical findings Positive likelihood ratio* Negative likelihood ratio* Probability of injury if maneuver is
Positive (%) Negative (%)

Anterior cruciate ligament tear

Pivot shift test3

20.3

0.4

69

4

Lachman test3

12.4

0.14

58

2

Anterior drawer test3

3.7

0.6

29

6

Effusion

Ballottement test; noticeable swelling16

3.6

0.4

NA

NA

Meniscal tear

Thessaly test15

39.3

0.09

81

1

McMurray test3

17.3

0.5

66

5

Age > 40 years, continuation of activity not possible, weight bearing during trauma, and pain with passive flexion17

5.8

0.9

39

9

Joint line tenderness3

1.1

0.8

11

8


NA = not applicable.

*—The likelihood ratio is a measure of how well a positive test rules in disease or a negative test rules out disease.

†—Based on an overall likelihood of 10 percent for each injury. If clinical suspicion is higher or lower, the probability would be correspondingly higher or lower.

Information from references 3, and 15 through 17.

Table 3.   Knee Injury: Diagnostic Accuracy of Physical Examination Maneuvers and Clinical Findings

View Table

Table 3.

Knee Injury: Diagnostic Accuracy of Physical Examination Maneuvers and Clinical Findings

Maneuver or clinical findings Positive likelihood ratio* Negative likelihood ratio* Probability of injury if maneuver is
Positive (%) Negative (%)

Anterior cruciate ligament tear

Pivot shift test3

20.3

0.4

69

4

Lachman test3

12.4

0.14

58

2

Anterior drawer test3

3.7

0.6

29

6

Effusion

Ballottement test; noticeable swelling16

3.6

0.4

NA

NA

Meniscal tear

Thessaly test15

39.3

0.09

81

1

McMurray test3

17.3

0.5

66

5

Age > 40 years, continuation of activity not possible, weight bearing during trauma, and pain with passive flexion17

5.8

0.9

39

9

Joint line tenderness3

1.1

0.8

11

8


NA = not applicable.

*—The likelihood ratio is a measure of how well a positive test rules in disease or a negative test rules out disease.

†—Based on an overall likelihood of 10 percent for each injury. If clinical suspicion is higher or lower, the probability would be correspondingly higher or lower.

Information from references 3, and 15 through 17.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly accurate in diagnosing injury to the ACL and posterior cruciate ligament.18 It can be used when historical and physical examination findings are equivocal. Although the use of MRI has been advocated to confirm clinical suspicions before proceeding to arthroscopy,13 the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons states that it is usually not required to diagnose an ACL tear.19 It has been suggested that MRI is better used to rule out internal derangement than to rule it in, because clinical findings are often sufficient for diagnosis.20 Internal derangement is unlikely (less than 2 percent) and MRI typically unnecessary if physical examination maneuvers are negative.3

Meniscal Tear

ILLUSTRATIVE CASE

A 42-year-old man presents two days after injuring his right knee while playing tennis. He twisted his body with the right leg planted on the court surface. He felt a sharp pain and could not continue playing. He reports mild swelling and a sense of clicking in the medial knee with episodes of locking, which prevent full range of motion. Examination reveals medial joint line tenderness, a positive ballottement test, pain with full flexion of the knee, and positive McMurray and Thessaly tests.

Several systematic reviews have examined the diagnostic accuracy of physical examination maneuvers in patients with meniscal tears.3,13,2126 Although the individual studies have been of varying quality and have had inconsistent results, there is agreement that composite findings from the history and physical examination are more clinically helpful than any examination maneuver alone, and that a thorough examination can be nearly as accurate as magnetic resonance imaging3,20  (Table 4 13).

Table 4.

Knee Injury: Diagnostic Clues from History and Physical Examination

History Physical examination Diagnosis to consider

Direct injury to anterior tibia; forced hyperflexion or hyperextension injury; posterior pain; pain with kneeling

Positive sag or posterior drawer test; mild swelling or slow onset; posterior swelling; painful limitation (10 to 20 degrees flexion)

Posterior cruciate ligament tear

Pivoting or leaping injury; sense of disruption; audible pop; instability; early swelling (one to two hours)

Positive Lachman, anterior drawer, or pivot shift test; loss of hyperextension

Anterior cruciate ligament tear

Squatting, cutting, or twisting injury; trivial twisting injury in older persons; giving way; locking and catching

Joint line tenderness; positive McMurray test; joint effusion; loss of extension (locked knee)

Meniscal tear


Adapted with permission from Robb G, Reid D, Arroll B, Jackson RT, Goodyear-Smith F. General practitioner diagnosis and management of acute knee injuries: summary of an evidence-based guideline. N Z Med J. 2007;120(1249):4.

Table 4.   Knee Injury: Diagnostic Clues from History and Physical Examination

View Table

Table 4.

Knee Injury: Diagnostic Clues from History and Physical Examination

History Physical examination Diagnosis to consider

Direct injury to anterior tibia; forced hyperflexion or hyperextension injury; posterior pain; pain with kneeling

Positive sag or posterior drawer test; mild swelling or slow onset; posterior swelling; painful limitation (10 to 20 degrees flexion)

Posterior cruciate ligament tear

Pivoting or leaping injury; sense of disruption; audible pop; instability; early swelling (one to two hours)

Positive Lachman, anterior drawer, or pivot shift test; loss of hyperextension

Anterior cruciate ligament tear

Squatting, cutting, or twisting injury; trivial twisting injury in older persons; giving way; locking and catching

Joint line tenderness; positive McMurray test; joint effusion; loss of extension (locked knee)

Meniscal tear


Adapted with permission from Robb G, Reid D, Arroll B, Jackson RT, Goodyear-Smith F. General practitioner diagnosis and management of acute knee injuries: summary of an evidence-based guideline. N Z Med J. 2007;120(1249):4.

Family physicians must have proficient physical examination skills and must be able to assess how much each finding increases or decreases clinical suspicion of meniscal injury. Some patients will be unable to fully extend the knee, indicating a possible “bucket-handle” meniscal tear.13 Tenderness on the joint line is fairly sensitive (76 percent) for meniscal tear, but is not specific (29 percent).3 The positive and negative likelihood ratios for joint line tenderness are approximately 1.0, so this finding does not provide useful information. A positive McMurray test substantially increases the probability of a meniscal tear; this test has high specificity (97 percent) but low sensitivity (52 percent).3 The Thessaly test is a validated method to assess for meniscal injury and is a valuable tool in the physical examination of patients with an acutely injured knee15,27 (Figure 2). It has been proven more accurate than the McMurray test or the finding of joint line tenderness.15

Figure 2.

The Thessaly test.

View Large


Figure 2.

The Thessaly test.


Figure 2.

The Thessaly test.

A combination of historical features and examination findings will help alert physicians to the possibility of meniscal tear more than the results of any one test.17 Features found to be most predictive of meniscal tear include age older than 40 years (odds ratio [OR] = 4.1), weight bearing during trauma (OR = 3.4), pain with passive flexion during examination (OR = 2.7), and inability to continue activity (OR = 2.2).17 The presence of all four of these features significantly increases the likelihood of meniscal tear; if the pretest probability of meniscal tear was 10 percent, the presence of all four factors increases that probability to 39 percent. The absence of all of these factors would decrease the probability to 1 percent.17

Effect of Effusion on Decision Making

The presence of effusion is a predictor of internal derangement; 74 to 91 percent of patients with traumatic injury and effusion have internal derangement of the knee.16,28 The combination of patients reporting swelling and having a positive ballottement test is helpful for detecting effusion (positive likelihood ratio = 3.6 when both are present; negative likelihood ratio = 0.4 when both are absent).16 Although ultrasonography is not routinely necessary for determining the presence of effusion, it can be diagnostic. Compared with MRI, ultrasonography may provide a more convenient, accessible, and cost-effective method of diagnosing effusion.28

Data Sources: A PubMed search was performed using the key terms knee injury and physical examination. Additional sources were obtained from Essential Evidence, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and a Google Scholars search. Search dates: January 25, 2011, and September 22, 2011.

The Author

MICHAEL GROVER, DO, is an assistant professor and vice chair for research in the Department of Family Medicine at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Scottsdale, Ariz.

Address correspondence to Michael Grover, DO, Mayo Clinic, 13737 N. 92nd St., Scottsdale, AZ 85259 (e-mail: grover.michael@mayo.edu). Reprints are not available from the author.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations to disclose.

REFERENCES

1. Baker P, Reading I, Cooper C, Coggon D. Knee disorders in the general population and their relation to occupation. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(10):794–797.

2. Cherry DK, Woodwell DA, Rechtsteiner EA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 summary. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad387.pdf. Accessed October 17, 2011.

3. Jackson JL, O'Malley PG, Kroenke K. Evaluation of acute knee pain in primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(7):575–588.

4. Tandeter HB, Shvartzman P. Acute knee injuries: use of decision rules for selective radiograph ordering. Am Fam Physician. 1999;60(9):2599–2608.

5. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria: acute trauma to the knee. http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/app_criteria/pdf/ExpertPanelonMusculoskeletalImaging/AcuteTraumatotheKNEEDoc2.aspx. Accessed October 17, 2011.

6. Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, Wells GA, et al. Derivation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26(4):405–413.

7. Seaberg DC, Jackson R. Clinical decision rule for knee radiographs. Am J Emerg Med. 1994;12(5):541–543.

8. Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, Wells GA, et al. Prospective validation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries. JAMA. 1996;275(8):611–615.

9. Bachmann LM, Haberzeth S, Steurer J, ter Riet G. The accuracy of the Ottawa knee rule to rule out knee fractures: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(2):121–124.

10. Jenny JY, Boeri C, El Amrani H, et al. Should plain X-rays be routinely performed after blunt knee trauma? A prospective analysis. J Trauma. 2005;58(6):1179–1182.

11. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Hoag RH, et al. Implementation of the Ottawa Knee Rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries. JAMA. 1997;278(23):2075–2079.

12. Seaberg DC, Yealy DM, Lukens T, Auble T, Mathias S. Multicenter comparison of two clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute, high-risk knee injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;32(1):8–13.

13. Robb G, Reid D, Arroll B, Jackson RT, Goodyear-Smith F. General practitioner diagnosis and management of acute knee injuries: summary of an evidence-based guideline. N Z Med J. 2007;120(1249):U2419.

14. Hardaker WT Jr, Garrett WE Jr, Bassett FH III. Evaluation of acute traumatic hemarthrosis of the knee joint. South Med J. 1990;83(6):640–644.

15. Harrison BK, Abell BE, Gibson TW. The Thessaly test for detection of meniscal tears: validation of a new physical examination technique for primary care medicine. Clin J Sport Med. 2009;19(1):9–12.

16. Kastelein M, Luijsterburg PA, Wagemakers HP, et al. Diagnostic value of history taking and physical examination to assess effusion of the knee in traumatic knee patients in general practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(1):82–86.

17. Wagemakers HP, Heintjes EM, Boks SS, et al. Diagnostic value of history-taking and physical examination for assessing meniscal tears of the knee in general practice. Clin J Sport Med. 2008;18(1):24–30.

18. Hoyt M, Goodemote P, Morton J. How accurate is an MRI at diagnosing injured knee ligaments? J Fam Pract. 2010;59(2):118–120.

19. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries. http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/topic.cfm?topic=A00549. Accessed November 18, 2011.

20. Rayan F, Bhonsle S, Shukla DD. Clinical, MRI, and arthroscopic correlation in meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Int Orthop. 2009;33(1):129–132.

21. Scholten RJ, Opstelten W, van der Plas CG, Bijl D, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Accuracy of physical diagnostic tests for assessing ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. J Fam Pract. 2003;52(9):689–694.

22. Solomon DH, Simel DL, Bates DW, Katz JN, Schaffer JL. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have a torn meniscus or ligament of the knee? Value of the physical examination. JAMA. 2001;286(13):1610–1620.

23. Ryzewicz M, Peterson B, Siparsky PN, Bartz RL. The diagnosis of meniscus tears: the role of MRI and clinical examination. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;455:123–133.

24. Hegedus EJ, Cook C, Hasselblad V, Goode A, McCrory DC. Physical examination tests for assessing a torn meniscus in the knee: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(9):541–550.

25. Meserve BB, Cleland JA, Boucher TR. A meta-analysis examining clinical test utilities for assessing meniscal injury. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22(2):143–161.

26. Best evidence topic reports. Bet 3. Which is the best clinical test for diagnosing a knee meniscal injury? Emerg Med J. 2008;25(2):105–107.

27. Karachalios T, Hantes M, Zibis AH, Zachos V, Karantanas AH, Malizos KN. Diagnostic accuracy of a new clinical test (the Thessaly test) for early detection of meniscal tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(5):955–962.

28. Wang CY, Wang HK, Hsu CY, Shieh JY, Wang TG, Jiang CC. Role of sonographic examination in traumatic knee internal derangement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(8):984–987.



Copyright © 2012 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Download PDF
  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

More in Pubmed

Navigate this Article