Hearing Loss in Older Adults



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2012 Jun 15;85(12):1150-1156.

Hearing loss affects approximately one-third of adults 61 to 70 years of age and more than 80 percent of those older than 85 years. Men usually experience greater hearing loss and have earlier onset compared with women. The most common type is age-related hearing loss; however, many conditions can interfere with the conduction of sound vibrations to the inner ear and their conversion to electrical impulses for conduction to the brain. Screening for hearing loss is recommended in adults older than 50 to 60 years. Office screening tests include the whispered voice test and audioscopy. Older patients who admit to having difficulty hearing may be referred directly for audiometry. The history can identify risk factors for hearing loss, especially noise exposure and use of ototoxic medications. Examination of the auditory canal and tympanic membrane can identify causes of conductive hearing loss. Audiometric testing is required to confirm hearing loss. Adults presenting with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss should be referred for urgent assessment. Management of hearing loss is based on addressing underlying causes, especially obstructions (including cerumen) and ototoxic medications. Residual hearing should be optimized by use of hearing aids, assistive listening devices, and rehabilitation programs. Surgical implants are indicated for selected patients. Major barriers to improved hearing in older adults include lack of recognition of hearing loss; perception that hearing loss is a normal part of aging or is not amenable to treatment; and patient nonadherence with hearing aids because of stigma, cost, inconvenience, disappointing initial results, or other factors.

At least 28 million U.S. adults have hearing loss.1 After hypertension and arthritis, it is the most common chronic health problem in older persons.2 The impact of hearing loss on society will increase as baby boomers age, because the age-specific prevalence of hearing loss and the number of older persons are increasing.3

Normal conversations use frequencies of 500 to 3,000 Hz at 45 to 60 dB. After 60 years of age, hearing typically declines by about 1 dB annually. Men usually experience greater hearing loss and earlier onset compared with women.4 Hearing loss of 25 dB or more affects about 37 percent of adults 61 to 70 years of age, 60 percent of adults 71 to 80 years of age, and more than 80 percent of adults older than 85 years.5,6 No evidence supports a threshold age for the onset of hearing loss.7

Hearing loss impacts communication and functional ability, and is strongly associated with decreased quality of life, cognitive decline, and depression.3,8 Despite its prevalence and morbidity, hearing loss is underrecognized and undertreated.3 It may be underrecognized because it is a slowly developing problem or because of the belief that hearing loss is a normal part of aging. Undertreatment may result from poor appreciation of options for hearing enhancement, or patient resistance or inability to use hearing aids and assistive listening devices. Cost and social stigma are major factors in the diagnosis and management of hearing loss.

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendation Evidence rating References

The American Academy of Family Physicians recommends screening persons older than 60 years for hearing loss during periodic health examinations.

C

13

Older patients who report hearing loss can be referred directly for audiometry.

C

16

Magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium is recommended for patients presenting with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss to identify those with serious underlying pathologic conditions.

C

22

Appropriate counseling should be provided to patients with hearing loss, because patient perceptions and expectations are the most important factors in the acquisition and use of hearing aids.

C

20, 30, 31

Referral for assessment for assistive listening devices should be considered in patients with hearing loss who are unable to use hearing aids.

C

33


A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

View Table

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendation Evidence rating References

The American Academy of Family Physicians recommends screening persons older than 60 years for hearing loss during periodic health examinations.

C

13

Older patients who report hearing loss can be referred directly for audiometry.

C

16

Magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium is recommended for patients presenting with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss to identify those with serious underlying pathologic conditions.

C

22

Appropriate counseling should be provided to patients with hearing loss, because patient perceptions and expectations are the most important factors in the acquisition and use of hearing aids.

C

20, 30, 31

Referral for assessment for assistive listening devices should be considered in patients with hearing loss who are unable to use hearing aids.

C

33


A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

Etiology and Pathophysiology

Hearing loss is classified as conductive or sensorineural (Table 1). Conductive hearing loss is usually caused by problems in the external or middle ear that interfere with transmitting sound and its conversion to mechanical vibrations. Sensorineural hearing loss involves problems converting mechanical vibrations to electrical potential in the cochlea and/or in auditory nerve transmission to the brain. It is usually caused by permanent damage in the organ of Corti.3 More than 90 percent of older persons with hearing loss have age-related sensorineural hearing loss, which is a gradual, symmetric loss of hearing (predominantly of high frequencies) that is worse in noisy environments.3 Older persons may have both conductive and sensorineural hearing loss, and may also have cognitive difficulties in sound interpretation.

Table 1.

Causes of Hearing Loss in Older Adults

Site/type of blockage Examples of etiology

Conductive hearing loss

Obstruction of external auditory canal

Cerumen; foreign body; debris from otitis externa; large exostoses, osteomas

Impairment of tympanic membrane function

Perforated tympanic membrane; tympanosclerosis

Middle ear conditions

Otitis media with effusion; otosclerosis; cholesteatoma; disarticulation of ossicular chain; glomus tumors

Sensorineural hearing loss

No site/types

Age-related hearing loss; noise trauma; medications; autoimmune disease; mechanical trauma (e.g., temporal bone fracture); Meniere disease; infection (e.g., meningitis, labyrinthitis); neoplasm (e.g., acoustic neuroma)


note: Causes are in approximate order of most to least common within each category.

Table 1.   Causes of Hearing Loss in Older Adults

View Table

Table 1.

Causes of Hearing Loss in Older Adults

Site/type of blockage Examples of etiology

Conductive hearing loss

Obstruction of external auditory canal

Cerumen; foreign body; debris from otitis externa; large exostoses, osteomas

Impairment of tympanic membrane function

Perforated tympanic membrane; tympanosclerosis

Middle ear conditions

Otitis media with effusion; otosclerosis; cholesteatoma; disarticulation of ossicular chain; glomus tumors

Sensorineural hearing loss

No site/types

Age-related hearing loss; noise trauma; medications; autoimmune disease; mechanical trauma (e.g., temporal bone fracture); Meniere disease; infection (e.g., meningitis, labyrinthitis); neoplasm (e.g., acoustic neuroma)


note: Causes are in approximate order of most to least common within each category.

About one-half of the susceptibility to age-related hearing loss may be genetically determined.5 Several genes may be involved.5,9 Noise exposure contributes to the onset, but not to the progression, of age-related hearing loss.7  Regular exposure to 85 dB or more increases the risk of hearing loss by mechanical and metabolic damage to cochlear hair cells. Other implicated factors may be synergistic (Table 2).4,5,9,10

Table 2.

Risk Factors for Age-Related Hearing Loss

Risk factor Comment

Alcohol use

Inconsistent study results: occasional alcohol use may be protective vs. abuse possibly increases risk5

Low or moderate alcohol consumption has no effect, but may interact with other nutritional factors, especially vitamin B12

Family history

Genetic component in age of onset and severity5,9

Hormones

Estrogen, aldosterone possibly protective5

Progestin may increase risk5

Illicit drug use

Ecstasy linked to ototoxicity

Industrial chemicals

Especially toluene, styrene5

Male sex

Younger age of onset and greater loss in men4

Medical conditions

Including diabetes mellitus, renal failure, atherosclerosis, immunosuppression, head injury

Medications

Salicylates, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, aminoglycosides, cisplatin, diuretics, topical preparations containing neomycin/polymixin B, quinine, tea tree oil, macrolides, vincristine, sildenafil

Noise

Occupational, leisure, military-related

Tobacco use

Smoking history has small effect after adjustment for associated factors, especially sex and occupational exposure5

Vitamin intake

No evidence for vitamins B12, C, or E, or beta carotene reducing risk

Some evidence for reduced risk with high folate intake10


Information from references 4, 5, 9, and 10.

Table 2.   Risk Factors for Age-Related Hearing Loss

View Table

Table 2.

Risk Factors for Age-Related Hearing Loss

Risk factor Comment

Alcohol use

Inconsistent study results: occasional alcohol use may be protective vs. abuse possibly increases risk5

Low or moderate alcohol consumption has no effect, but may interact with other nutritional factors, especially vitamin B12

Family history

Genetic component in age of onset and severity5,9

Hormones

Estrogen, aldosterone possibly protective5

Progestin may increase risk5

Illicit drug use

Ecstasy linked to ototoxicity

Industrial chemicals

Especially toluene, styrene5

Male sex

Younger age of onset and greater loss in men4

Medical conditions

Including diabetes mellitus, renal failure, atherosclerosis, immunosuppression, head injury

Medications

Salicylates, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, aminoglycosides, cisplatin, diuretics, topical preparations containing neomycin/polymixin B, quinine, tea tree oil, macrolides, vincristine, sildenafil

Noise

Occupational, leisure, military-related

Tobacco use

Smoking history has small effect after adjustment for associated factors, especially sex and occupational exposure5

Vitamin intake

No evidence for vitamins B12, C, or E, or beta carotene reducing risk

Some evidence for reduced risk with high folate intake10


Information from references 4, 5, 9, and 10.

Persons may be unaware of mild to moderate hearing loss because of its insidious onset and progression, or because it is not apparent in quiet environments. Only about 20 percent of persons 65 years or older with moderate to profound hearing loss perceive themselves as hearing impaired.11 Many do not perceive hearing loss as appropriate for medical intervention.

Screening

Formal audiometric testing in a sound-protected environment is the diagnostic standard.12 However, expense and time make this impractical for screening. Good-quality evidence supports common screening tests to identify persons with hearing loss. Nevertheless, the benefits of population screening are difficult to demonstrate because significant numbers of persons do not follow up for audiometric diagnosis. The benefits are further decreased because many persons with confirmed hearing loss do not obtain or use hearing aids.3,11,12

Leading expert organizations recommend asking older patients or caretakers about hearing difficulties. Recommendations differ about further testing if a problem is identified (Table 3).11,1315 The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is currently updating its 1996 recommendations.11 The Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement indicates that screening for age-related hearing loss is effective and should be provided whenever possible.15 The American Academy of Family Physicians recommends screening persons older than 60 years during periodic health examinations.13

Table 3.

Leading Consensus Recommendations for Hearing Loss Screening in Older Adults

Organization Key issues

American Academy of Family Physicians13

Question older adults about hearing loss, and counsel regarding the availability of treatment when appropriate

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association14

Audiometric testing (25 dB at 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz) on request or if risk factors are present, and every three years after 50 years of age

Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement15

Ask patients if they have hearing loss, and refer positive responders for formal audiometric testing; screen those who do not perceive any loss using the whispered voice test or audioscopy

Screening should be followed by counseling on hearing aids/services, and referrals as appropriate

Screening every two to 10 years is reasonable

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force11

Good-quality evidence for common tests to identify risk

More research needed to clarify net benefits

Updated draft recommendations available for public comment (http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf11/adulthearing/adulthearart.htm)


Information from references 11, and 13 through 15.

Table 3.   Leading Consensus Recommendations for Hearing Loss Screening in Older Adults

View Table

Table 3.

Leading Consensus Recommendations for Hearing Loss Screening in Older Adults

Organization Key issues

American Academy of Family Physicians13

Question older adults about hearing loss, and counsel regarding the availability of treatment when appropriate

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association14

Audiometric testing (25 dB at 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz) on request or if risk factors are present, and every three years after 50 years of age

Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement15

Ask patients if they have hearing loss, and refer positive responders for formal audiometric testing; screen those who do not perceive any loss using the whispered voice test or audioscopy

Screening should be followed by counseling on hearing aids/services, and referrals as appropriate

Screening every two to 10 years is reasonable

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force11

Good-quality evidence for common tests to identify risk

More research needed to clarify net benefits

Updated draft recommendations available for public comment (http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf11/adulthearing/adulthearart.htm)


Information from references 11, and 13 through 15.

Each screening test has advantages and limitations (Table 4).1113,1517 A systematic review concluded that adults who report hearing loss (spontaneously or on questioning) should be referred directly for audiometry, and those who deny hearing problems should be screened with the whispered voice test or audioscopy.16  Inspection of the auditory canal and tympanic membrane, removal of any obstruction, and repeat questioning are prudent before screening or referral. The screening version of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly provides information on social and emotional problems (Table 5).18 It can be used alone or to complement other tests.12 Studies indicate that telephone or Internet-based screening may also be effective.17

Table 4.

Characteristics of Common Screening Tests for Hearing Loss

Test Description Positive likelihood ratio*11 Negative likelihood ratio*

Whispered voice

From 2 feet behind patient, examiner occludes and rubs the untested ear with one finger, fully exhales, and then whispers at least two different combinations of three numbers/letters

2.3 to 7.4

0.01 to 0.73

Patient who can repeat three of six items passes

Soft voice and high-frequency sounds (consonants) may falsely exaggerate age-related hearing loss

Single question

Ask the following (or similar) question: Do you have difficulty hearing?

2.4 to 3.8

Reported 90 percent agreement between self-report of hearing loss and audiometric assessment in persons 50 to 59 years of age, and 83 percent agreement in persons 60 years and older

No studies have assessed family member report, but this may be even more valuable than patient report

Screening version of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (Table 5)

Validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire

2.4 to 11.0†

0.43 to 0.70†

Assesses impact of hearing loss

Takes about five minutes to complete

Audioscopy

Handheld device that emits pure tones (25 to 40 dB at 500 to 4,000 Hz)

3.4 to 9.8

0.10 to 0.40

Enables audiometric testing during inspection of auditory canal and tympanic membrane


*—For detecting hearing loss greater than 30 dB.

†—Using a cutoff score of 8.

Information from references 11 through 13, and 15 through 17.

Table 4.   Characteristics of Common Screening Tests for Hearing Loss

View Table

Table 4.

Characteristics of Common Screening Tests for Hearing Loss

Test Description Positive likelihood ratio*11 Negative likelihood ratio*

Whispered voice

From 2 feet behind patient, examiner occludes and rubs the untested ear with one finger, fully exhales, and then whispers at least two different combinations of three numbers/letters

2.3 to 7.4

0.01 to 0.73

Patient who can repeat three of six items passes

Soft voice and high-frequency sounds (consonants) may falsely exaggerate age-related hearing loss

Single question

Ask the following (or similar) question: Do you have difficulty hearing?

2.4 to 3.8

Reported 90 percent agreement between self-report of hearing loss and audiometric assessment in persons 50 to 59 years of age, and 83 percent agreement in persons 60 years and older

No studies have assessed family member report, but this may be even more valuable than patient report

Screening version of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (Table 5)

Validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire

2.4 to 11.0†

0.43 to 0.70†

Assesses impact of hearing loss

Takes about five minutes to complete

Audioscopy

Handheld device that emits pure tones (25 to 40 dB at 500 to 4,000 Hz)

3.4 to 9.8

0.10 to 0.40

Enables audiometric testing during inspection of auditory canal and tympanic membrane


*—For detecting hearing loss greater than 30 dB.

†—Using a cutoff score of 8.

Information from references 11 through 13, and 15 through 17.

Table 5.

Questions from the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly–Screening Version

1. Does a hearing problem cause you to feel embarrassed when meeting new people?

2. Does a hearing problem cause you to feel frustrated when talking to members of your family?

3. Do you have difficulty hearing when someone speaks in a whisper?

4. Do you feel handicapped by a hearing problem?

5. Does a hearing problem cause you difficulty when visiting friends, relatives, or neighbors?

6. Does a hearing problem cause you to attend religious services less often than you would like?

7. Does a hearing problem cause you to have arguments with family members?

8. Does a hearing problem cause you difficulty when listening to the television or radio?

9. Do you feel that any difficulty with your hearing limits or hampers your personal or social life?

10. Does a hearing problem cause you difficulty when in a restaurant with relatives or friends?


note: For each question, the scores are yes = 4 points; sometimes = 2 points; and no = 0 points. Scores range from 0 (no handicap) to 40 (maximal handicap).

Adapted with permission from Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. Identification of elderly people with hearing problems. ASHA. 1983;25(7):42.

Table 5.   Questions from the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly–Screening Version

View Table

Table 5.

Questions from the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly–Screening Version

1. Does a hearing problem cause you to feel embarrassed when meeting new people?

2. Does a hearing problem cause you to feel frustrated when talking to members of your family?

3. Do you have difficulty hearing when someone speaks in a whisper?

4. Do you feel handicapped by a hearing problem?

5. Does a hearing problem cause you difficulty when visiting friends, relatives, or neighbors?

6. Does a hearing problem cause you to attend religious services less often than you would like?

7. Does a hearing problem cause you to have arguments with family members?

8. Does a hearing problem cause you difficulty when listening to the television or radio?

9. Do you feel that any difficulty with your hearing limits or hampers your personal or social life?

10. Does a hearing problem cause you difficulty when in a restaurant with relatives or friends?


note: For each question, the scores are yes = 4 points; sometimes = 2 points; and no = 0 points. Scores range from 0 (no handicap) to 40 (maximal handicap).

Adapted with permission from Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. Identification of elderly people with hearing problems. ASHA. 1983;25(7):42.

Assessment

The history may indicate the etiology of hearing loss (Table 6), and can identify risk factors, especially noise exposure and use of ototoxic medications (Table 24,5,9,10). Unilateral hearing loss suggests local pathology, obstruction, or idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Gradual onset may suggest age-related hearing loss, otosclerosis, or acoustic neuroma. By comparison, rapid onset may be related to a perforated tympanic membrane, trauma, or idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The history should include asking about functional and emotional impacts of hearing loss, especially depression and social isolation.

Table 6.

Medical History for Hearing Loss in Older Persons

Item Finding and significance

Laterality

Unilateral hearing loss suggests local pathology, obstruction, or idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Onset

Gradual onset suggests age-related hearing loss, otosclerosis, acoustic neuroma

Rapid onset suggests perforated tympanic membrane, trauma, idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Inciting factors

Temporal relationship to ototoxic medications/substances, infections, trauma

Associated features

Exacerbation in noisy environments and greater loss of high frequencies suggest age-related hearing loss

Harsh, distorted sound and aural fullness typical of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Other symptoms depending on underlying pathology (e.g., tinnitus, nausea, vertigo in persons with Meniere disease; neurologic findings in persons with tumors)

Table 6.   Medical History for Hearing Loss in Older Persons

View Table

Table 6.

Medical History for Hearing Loss in Older Persons

Item Finding and significance

Laterality

Unilateral hearing loss suggests local pathology, obstruction, or idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Onset

Gradual onset suggests age-related hearing loss, otosclerosis, acoustic neuroma

Rapid onset suggests perforated tympanic membrane, trauma, idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Inciting factors

Temporal relationship to ototoxic medications/substances, infections, trauma

Associated features

Exacerbation in noisy environments and greater loss of high frequencies suggest age-related hearing loss

Harsh, distorted sound and aural fullness typical of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Other symptoms depending on underlying pathology (e.g., tinnitus, nausea, vertigo in persons with Meniere disease; neurologic findings in persons with tumors)

Physical examination includes inspection of the auditory canal and tympanic membrane for obstruction. Tympanic membrane mobility testing requires a pneumatic bulb. If indicated by the history, examination of the head and neck, sinuses, oropharynx, and cranial nerves, and evaluation of vestibular, cerebellar, and cognitive function may be helpful; however, no evidence-based recommendations are available.16

The Weber and Rinne tests were designed to distinguish conductive from sensorineural hearing loss by comparing air and bone conduction. A review concluded that these tests should not be used routinely for screening because of accuracy problems.16

Laboratory and imaging tests should be individualized by patient presentation.

Management

Management goals are to address any underlying, contributing, or comorbid conditions and to optimize hearing. Effective intervention can improve social and emotional function, communication, cognitive function, and depression for patients with hearing loss.19 Despite the potential quality-of-life benefits for patients and families, nonadherence with treatment recommendations is common. The patient's perception of the significance of hearing loss, expectations for improvement, and willingness to use assistive listening devices permanently are significant factors in adherence. Disappointing initial results with hearing aids is a commonly cited reason for nonadherence.20

Additional influences include convenience, cost, type of intervention (especially the design of aids and devices), social norms, negative stereotypes associated with hearing loss and/or use of hearing aids, reported experience of others, and physician recommendations.21 Treatment strategies for hearing loss must be patient-centered and individualized.20 A major role for family physicians is identifying and addressing patient barriers to management of hearing loss, encouraging adherence with the optimal interventions, and monitoring for improvements in management as the patient's situation changes and/or new treatments, aids, and devices become available.

IDIOPATHIC SUDDEN SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss develops in less than 72 hours and is usually unilateral. The sound is described as harsh and distorted with accompanying aural fullness. It affects five to 20 per 100,000 adults 40 to 60 years of age annually.22 Approximately 32 to 70 percent recover spontaneously, but idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss is an emergency requiring prompt referral. Up to 16 percent of patients presenting with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss are subsequently diagnosed with significant pathology, including autoimmune disease and neurologic conditions. Magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium is recommended for all patients with potential idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss to identify those with serious underlying pathologic conditions.22

Steroids are the current standard treatment for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, but several systematic reviews have failed to support significantly better outcomes with steroid therapy compared with placebo or other treatments.2225 Studies have also failed to identify predictive factors for spontaneous recovery in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.26 Because of the risk of permanent hearing loss and the possibility of symptoms being caused by another serious condition, patients presenting with symptoms suggesting idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss should be referred for urgent specialist assessment.22

CONDUCTIVE HEARING LOSS

Conductive hearing loss often exacerbates age-related hearing loss. The most common cause, cerumen impaction, may exacerbate hearing loss in up to 30 percent of older persons. Techniques for removing cerumen include curetting, nonprescription solutions (hydrogen peroxide–based), warm water irrigation, and prescription cerumenolytics. A comprehensive review including studies of 11 different agents concluded that drops of any type appear to provide better outcomes than no intervention, but no specific drop is more effective than another.27 Although warm water irrigation is commonly used, one study demonstrated hearing improvement in only 34 percent of persons after visually effective irrigation.28

Chronic otitis media with effusion (serous otitis media) is common in older patients, but treatment has been evaluated only in children. Short courses of oral steroids or antibiotics may ameliorate serous otitis media. Patients with persistent serous otitis media should be referred for assessment because of the possibility of nasopharyngeal carcinoma or another lesion obstructing the eustachian tube.3

HEARING AIDS

Hearing aids are available as behind-the-ear, in-the-ear, and in-the-canal models. The choice of aid is predominantly determined by the patient's perception of ease of use and appearance.3 Practical problems include inserting, removing, and cleaning the device; changing batteries; controlling volume; and coping with extraneous noises, especially “whistles.” In-the-ear aids may be the easiest to manage, but patient satisfaction correlates better with the size and shape of the aid than the type.29 Patients are more likely to use in-the-canal or in-the-ear aids than behind-the-ear models.3

Despite many well-documented benefits, only 25 percent of eligible patients acquire hearing aids and up to 30 percent of those do not use their aids.19,30 The biggest motivation for use is patient confidence that communication will improve. The biggest barrier is the perception that hearing loss does not merit correction, regardless of the level of loss.31 Hearing aid use is not correlated with age, education level, functional impairment, or medication use.32 Physicians can play a significant role in promoting the proper use of hearing aids. Counseling should be provided to patients with hearing loss, because patient perceptions and expectations are the most important factors in the acquisition and use of hearing aids.20,30,31

ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES

Referral for assessment for assistive listening devices should be considered in patients with hearing loss who are unable to use hearing aids.33 Assistive listening devices can provide visual or tactile alerts or amplify other devices, such as telephones. Assistive listening devices provide safe, cost-effective alternatives to hearing aids for some older persons, such as those who are bed-bound, who are reliant on others for hearing aid management, or who could swallow or lose aids because of cognitive impairment.33 They may be useful adjuncts to hearing aids. Assistive listening devices are most successful in improving quality of life when individual patient needs are closely matched to specific devices.

SURGICAL IMPLANTS

In selected patients, including those who do not tolerate hearing aids, middle ear implants may provide comparable improvement in sound quality and clarity to hearing aids. Preliminary studies suggest that the implants improve hearing and patient satisfaction mainly by reducing symptoms of ear occlusion and sound feedback.34 Cost is a major limitation of more widespread use of these implants.

In patients with severe sensorineural hearing loss, cochlear implants can improve sound discrimination better than other devices.35,36 A recent small retrospective study showed that even in adults older than 70 years, cochlear implants improved quality of life and decreased tinnitus.37 More widespread use of cochlear implants and other surgical treatments for older patients will depend on evidence that the potential for enhanced function and quality of life can be achieved despite adverse factors, mainly surgical risk and cost.38

REHABILITATION

Communication therapy programs provide training in utilizing nonverbal cues and enhanced communication skills, particularly in noisy environments. Programs can improve communication as well as psychological well-being.39 Providing training that enhances communication skills to spouses of persons with hearing loss also reduces stress and improves communication and quality of life for both partners.40

Prevention

Avoiding risk factors and noise is key to preventing the onset of age-related hearing loss. Emerging evidence suggests that folic acid (800 mcg daily) and high intake of omega-3 fatty acids may slow hearing decline.10,41 Conversely, elevated homocysteine levels may predispose to more rapid or more severe hearing loss.42 Additional research is needed on potential strategies to prevent the onset and slow the progression of age-related hearing loss.

Data Sources: A PubMed search was completed using the key terms hearing loss, older adults, and hearing impairment. The search included meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and reviews. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality evidence reports, the Cochrane database, the National Guideline Clearinghouse database, Clinical Evidence, and Essential Evidence Plus were also searched. Searches were conducted initially in December 2010. Additional searches were conducted in January 2011, and September through October 2011. Secondary searches were based on the bibliographies of the articles and resources identified by the primary searches.

editor's note: Anne D. Walling, MB, ChB, FFPHM is an associate medical editor for American Family Physician.

The Authors

ANNE D. WALLING, MB, ChB, FFPHM, is a professor of family and community medicine, and the associate dean for faculty affairs at the University of Kansas School of Medicine—Wichita.

GRETCHEN M. DICKSON, MD, MBA, is an assistant professor of family and community medicine, and the clerkship director at the University of Kansas School of Medicine—Wichita.

Address correspondence to Anne D. Walling, MB, ChB, FFPHM, University of Kansas School of Medicine, 1010 N. Kansas, Wichita, KS 67214–3199. Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations to disclose.

REFERENCES

1. Van Vliet D. The current status of hearing care: can we change the status quo? J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16(7):410–418.

2. Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, et al. Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148(9):879–886.

3. Yueh B, Shapiro N, MacLean CH, Shekelle PG. Screening and management of adult hearing loss in primary care: scientific review. JAMA. 2003;289(15):1976–1985.

4. Lee FS, Matthews LJ, Dubno JR, Mills JH. Longitudinal study of pure-tone thresholds in older persons. Ear Hear. 2005;26(1):1–11.

5. Van Eyken E, Van Camp G, Van Laer L. The complexity of age-related hearing impairment: contributing environmental and genetic factors. Audiol Neurootol. 2007;12(6):345–358.

6. Gates GA, Cooper JC Jr, Kannel WB, Miller NJ. Hearing in the elderly: the Framinghan cohort, 1983–1985. Part 1. Basic audiometric tests results. Ear Hear. 1990;11(4):257–256.

7. Cruickshanks KJ, Nondahl DM, Tweed TS, et al. Education, occupation, noise exposure history and the 10-yr cumulative incidence of hearing impairment in older adults. Hear Res. 2010;264(1–2):3–9.

8. Gates GA, Cobb JL, Linn RT, Rees T, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB. Central auditory dysfunction, cognitive dysfunction, and dementia in older people. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(2):161–167.

9. Van Eyken E, Van Laer L, Fransen E, et al. KCNQ4: a gene for age-related hearing impairment? Hum Mutat. 2006;27(10):1007–1016.

10. Durga J, Verhoef P, Anteunis LJ, Schouten E, Kok FJ. Effects of folic acid supplementation on hearing in older adults: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(1):1–9.

11. Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Fleming C, Beil T. Screening adults aged 50 years or older for hearing loss: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(5):347–355.

12. Yueh B, Collins MP, Souza PE, et al. Long-term effectiveness of screening for hearing loss: the screening for auditory impairment—which hearing assessment test (SAI-WHAT) randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(3):427–434.

13. American Academy of Family Physicians. Clinical preventive services: hearing. August 2011. http://www.aafp.org/patient-care/clinical-recommendations/all/hearing.html. Accessed February 2, 2012.

14. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Guidelines for audologic screening. http://www.asha.org/docs/html/GL1997-00199.html#sec1.9. Accessed February 7, 2012.

15. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. Preventive services for adults. 17th ed. September 2011. http://www.icsi.org/preventive_services_for_adults/preventive_services_for_adults_4.html. Accessed April 20, 2012.

16. Bagai A, Thavendiranathan P, Detsky AS. Does this patient have hearing impairment? JAMA. 2006;295(4):416–428.

17. Jansen S, Luts H, Wagener KC, Frachet B, Wouters J. The French digit triplet test: a hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol. 2010;49(5):378–387.

18. Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. Identification of elderly people with hearing problems. ASHA. 1983;25(7):37–42.

19. Mulrow CD, Aguilar C, Endicott JE, et al. Quality-of-life changes and hearing impairment. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113(3):188–194.

20. Pacal JT, Yueh B. Hearing deficits in the older patient: “I didn't notice anything.” JAMA. 2012;307(11):1185–1194.

21. Laplante-Lévesque A, Hickson L, Worrall L. Factors influencing rehabilitation decisions of adults with acquired hearing impairment. Int J Audiol. 2010;49(7):497–507.

22. Rauch SD. Clinical practice. Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(8):833–840.

23. Conlin AE, Parnes LS. Treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss: I. A systematic review. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(6):573–581.

24. Wei BP, Mubiru S, O'Leary S. Steroids for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006(1):CD003998.

25. Labus J, Breil J, Stützer H, Michel O. Meta-analysis for the effect of medical therapy vs. placebo on recovery of idiopathic sudden hearing loss. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(9):1863–1871.

26. Fetterman BL, Saunders JE, Luxford WM. Prognosis and treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Am J Otol. 1996;17(4):529–536.

27. Burton MJ, Doree C. Ear drops for the removal of ear wax. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009(1):CD004326.

28. Memel D, Langley C, Watkins C, Laue B, Birchall M, Bachmann M. Effectiveness of ear syringing in general practice: a randomised controlled trial and patients' experiences. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52(484):906–911.

29. Yueh B, Souza PE, McDowell JA, et al. Randomized trial of amplification strategies. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(10):1197–1204.

30. Popelka MM, Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, Klein BE, Klein R. Low prevalence of hearing aid use among older adults with hearing loss: the Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46(9):1075–1078.

31. Gussekloo J, de Bont LE, von Faber M, et al. Auditory rehabilitation of older people from the general population—the Leiden 85-plus study. Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53(492):536–540.

32. Kochkin S. MarkeTrak IV: What is the viable market for hearing aids? Hearing J. 1997;50(1):31–39.

33. Lesner SA. Candidacy and management of assistive listening devices: special needs of the elderly. Int J Audiol. 2003;42(suppl 2):2S68–2S76.

34. Tysome JR, Moorthy R, Lee A, Jiang D, O'Connor AF. Systematic review of middle ear implants: do they improve hearing as much as conventional hearing aids? Otol Neurotol. 2010;31(9):1369–1375.

35. Hamzavi J, Franz P, Baumgartner WD, Gstöettner W. Hearing performance in noise of cochlear implant patients versus severely-profoundly hearing-impaired patients with hearing aids. Audiology. 2001;40(1):26–31.

36. Bond M, Elston J, Mealing S, et al. Systematic reviews of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multi-channel unilateral cochlear implants for adults. Clin Otolaryngol. 2010;35(2):87–96.

37. Olze H, Gräbel S, Förster U, et al. Elderly patients benefit from cochlear implantation regarding auditory rehabilitation, quality of life, tinnitus, and stress. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(1):196–203.

38. Raman G, Lee J, Chung M, et al. Effectiveness of cochlear implants in adults with sensorineural hearing loss: technology assessment report. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; April 11, 2011. http://www.cms.gov/determinationprocess/downloads/id80TA.pdf. Accessed March 21, 2012.

39. Hickson L, Worrall L, Scarinci N. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the active communication education program for older people with hearing impairment. Ear Hear. 2007;28(2):212–230.

40. Preminger JE, Meeks S. Evaluation of an audiological rehabilitation program for spouses of people with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol. 2010;21(5):315–328.

41. Gopinath B, Flood VM, Rochtchina E, McMahon CM, Mitchell P. Consumption of omega-3 fatty acids and fish and risk of age-related hearing loss. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92(2):416–421.

42. Gopinath B, Flood VM, Rochtchina E, McMahon CM, Mitchell P. Serum homocysteine and folate concentrations are associated with prevalent age-related hearing loss. J Nutr. 2010;140(8):1469–1474.



Copyright © 2012 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Download PDF
  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

More in Pubmed

Navigate this Article