FPIN's Clinical Inquiries
Evaluation of Elevated Serum Transaminase Levels
FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.
FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.
Am Fam Physician. 2012 Oct 15;86(8):online.
What is the best approach to the evaluation of patients with elevated serum transaminase levels?
The evaluation of patients with elevated transaminase levels should be individualized based on the presence of symptoms or physical examination findings that suggest serious disease or hepatic decompensation. (Strength of Recommendation [SOR]: C, expert opinion.) The initial evaluation should determine specific etiologies, such as exposure to alcohol or hepatotoxic medications, viral hepatitis, or hemochromatosis. In patients with reassuring initial test results, lifestyle modification can reverse presumed nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the most common cause of persistently elevated liver transaminase levels. (SOR: B, based on cohort trials.) Transaminase levels that are elevated for longer than six months warrant additional investigation, which may include ultrasonography, additional serology, and possible liver biopsy. (SOR: C, expert opinion.)
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey determined the incidence and etiology of chronic liver disease in 9,670 adults.1 The cohort was weighted by race, ethnicity, sex, age, and education to be representative of the U.S. population. Investigators conducted household interviews, including medical and social histories; physical examinations; and laboratory studies (e.g., hepatitis serology; transferrin saturation; and glucose, lipid, and transaminase levels). Overall, 14.8 percent had chronic liver disease; of these, 74 percent had NAFLD, 14 percent had alcoholic liver disease, 13 percent had hepatitis C, 11 percent had iron overload, and 0.3 percent had hepatitis B (some patients had more than one of these conditions). Compared with earlier data, the prevalence of chronic liver disease has increased over the past 20 years from 12 to 15 percent, with a greater percentage being attributed to NAFLD (from 47 to 74 percent).2
A prospective controlled trial of 152 patients with elevated liver enzyme levels, central obesity, and multiple metabolic risk factors found that weight loss and exercise significantly improved enzyme elevations.3 Investigators randomized participants to moderate-intensity interventions (six patient-centered lifestyle counseling sessions over 10 weeks focused on increasing physical activity and losing weight), low-intensity interventions (three sessions over four weeks), or a control group. Compared with those in the control group, fewer patients in the exercise groups had elevated alanine transaminase (ALT) levels after three months (78 to 48 percent with moderate-intensity exercise; P < .05; odds ratio [OR] = 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10 to 0.83; 71 to 44 percent with low-intensity exercise; P < .05; OR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.92). ALT levels decreased by an average of 19 U per L (0.32 μkat per L) in the moderate-intensity group (P < .01 compared with baseline; P < .05 compared with control group), 15 U per L (0.25 μkat per L) in the low-intensity group (P < .01 compared with baseline; P < .05 compared with control group), and 7 U per L (0.12 μkat per L) in the control group (P < .05 compared with baseline).3
Because 2.5 percent of reported values will be falsely elevated, a normal result on repeat enzyme testing may constitute adequate evaluation and obviate further workup for patients in whom a false-positive result is suspected.4,5 If six months of lifestyle intervention does not produce improvements in transaminase levels, physicians should consider testing for Wilson disease, α1-antitrypsin deficiency, celiac disease, and autoimmune hepatitis.6
A case series with 81 adult patients who had persistently elevated ALT without serologic explanation found that 90 percent had steatosis or steatohepatitis on liver biopsy.7 All patients had negative serum tests for infectious, metabolic, autoimmune, or hereditary liver disease; no history of alcohol or hepatotoxic drug use; and no signs of chronic liver disease.
Recommendations from Others
The American Gastroenterological Association recommends performing an initial diagnostic evaluation on patients with marked elevations of transaminase levels or signs or symptoms of hepatic decompensation.4 Asymptomatic patients with reassuring findings on physical and serologic examination should have a period of lifestyle modification for presumed NAFLD. Physicians should counsel patients to stop drinking alcohol and reduce hepatotoxic medication use when possible. In patients with risk factors or persistently abnormal test results, serologic testing for viral hepatitis and evaluation for hemochromatosis are recommended.5,8 Ultrasonography and testing for uncommon causes of chronic liver disease in low-risk patients are not recommended. Physicians should consider liver biopsy if the diagnosis remains uncertain (Figure 1).
Management of Mild ALT Elevation
Address correspondence to Michael Grover, DO, at firstname.lastname@example.org. Reprints are not available from the authors.
Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations to disclose.
Copyright Family Physicians Inquiries Network. Used with permission.
1. Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Afendy M, et al. Changes in the prevalence of the most common causes of chronic liver diseases in the United States from 1988 to 2008. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(6):524–530.
2. Clark JM, Brancati FL, Diehl AM. The prevalence and etiology of elevated aminotransferase levels in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(5):960–967.
3. St George A, Bauman A, Johnston A, et al. Effect of a lifestyle intervention in patients with abnormal liver enzymes and metabolic risk factors. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24(3):399–407.
4. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: evaluation of liver chemistry tests. Gastroenterology. 2002;123(4):1364–1366.
5. Pratt DS, Kaplan MM. Evaluation of abnormal liver-enzyme results in asymptomatic patients. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(17):1266–1271.
6. Mathiesen UL, Franzén LE, Frydén A, et al. The clinical significance of slightly to moderately increased liver transaminase values in asymptomatic patients. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999;34(1):85–91.
7. Daniel S, Ben-Menachem T, Vasudevan G, et al. Prospective evaluation of unexplained chronic liver transaminase abnormalities in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(10):3010–3014.
8. Krier M, Ahmed A. The asymptomatic outpatient with abnormal liver function tests. Clin Liver Dis. 2009;13(2):167–177.
Clinical Inquiries provides answers to questions submitted by practicing family physicians to the Family Physicians Inquiries Network (FPIN). Members of the network select questions based on their relevance to family medicine. Answers are drawn from an approved set of evidence-based resources and undergo peer review. The strength of recommendations and the level of evidence for individual studies are rated using criteria developed by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (http://www.cebm.net/?o=1025).
The complete database of evidence-based questions and answers is copyrighted by FPIN. If interested in submitting questions or writing answers for this series, go to http://www.fpin.org or email: email@example.com.
A collection of FPIN's Clinical Inquiries published in AFP is available at http://www.aafp.org/afp/fpin.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions