Am Fam Physician. 2013 Apr 15;87(8):536.
Original Article: Pediculosis and Scabies: A Treatment Update
Issue Date: September 15, 2012
Available at: http://www.aafp.org/afp/2012/0915/p535.html
TO THE EDITOR: This article did not mention a valuable technique to assist in the diagnosis of scabies: the ink burrow test.1,2 When ink is applied over suspect skin areas, it is absorbed where mite burrows exist under the skin. Wiping away superficial ink reveals remaining ink that has penetrated the burrows.
Also, microscopic identification of mites, eggs, and fecal pellets can be performed by suspending skin scrapings in mineral oil.3 Mites will adhere to the oil, and skin scales will mix with the oil. Refractility differences will be greater between the mite and the oil. The oil will not dissolve fecal pellets. Although there are studies describing the use of potassium hydroxide (KOH) instead of mineral oil,4 KOH can dissolve fecal pellets, thereby hindering the identification of Sarcoptes scabiei.5,6 For this reason, mineral oil is preferred over a KOH solution.
Author disclosure: Dr. de Caprariis was previously employed by Pfizer as the medical director for antifungal medications from 2009 to February 2011. Dr. Della-Latta has no relevant financial affiliations.
REFERENCESshow all references
1. Speilman A. Arthropods. In: Gorbach SL, Bartlett JG, Blacklow NR, eds. Infectious Diseases. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa.: Saunders; 1998:2500–2501....
2. Sarwat MA, et al. Parasitological and clinical studies on human scabies in Cairo. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 1993;23(3):809–819.
3. Jarell A, Schalock PC. Procedures in dermatologic diagnosis and therapy. In: Schalock PC, Hsu JT, Arndt KA, eds. Lippincott's Primary Care Dermatology. Philadel-phia, Pa.: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
4. Hicks MI, Elston DM. Scabies. Dermatol Ther. 2009;22(4):279–292.
5. Garcia LS. Diagnostic Medical Parasitology. 5th ed. Washington DC: ASM Press; 2007:704.
6. Diaz JH. Scabies. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa.: Churchill Livingstone; 2010: 3633–3636.
IN REPLY: We appreciate the mention of ink burrow testing for the diagnosis of scabies. Also known as the burrow ink test, this method consists of rubbing the underside of a cartridge pen on a suspected scabies papule, and then wiping off the excess ink with an alcohol pad. Although the cartridge pen (with free-flowing ink) is a simple and inexpensive tool, ballpoint pens are more common in the United States, which limits the practicality of this test because of the scarcity of cartridge pens. Additionally, although the test appears to be a valid diagnostic tool, a prolonged search is occasionally required to find the positive lesion even in patients in whom scabies is strongly suspected.1 Because a lengthy examination may be impractical in the busy office setting, we recommended empiric treatment of patients with pruritus, typical lesions, and a history of itching in close contacts.2
We agree that mineral oil is superior to KOH preparations for the microscopic examination of skin scrapings in the diagnosis of scabies, and included recommendations to use mineral oil when testing is indicated.
Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.
1. Woodley D, Saurat JH. Burrow Ink Test and the scabies mite. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1981;4(6):715–722.
2. Page TL, Eiff MP, Judkins DZ, Walker B. Clinical inquiries. When should you treat scabies empirically? J Fam Pract. 2007;56(7):570–572.
Send letters to Kenneth W. Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online, e-mail: email@example.com, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680.
Please include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.
Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the American Academy of Family Physicians permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.
Copyright © 2013 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact firstname.lastname@example.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions