POEMs

Colorectal Neoplasia Yield Similar for FIT Every One, Two, or Three Years

 


FREE PREVIEW. AAFP members and paid subscribers: Log in to get free access. All others: Purchase online access.


FREE PREVIEW. Purchase online access to read the full version of this article.

Am Fam Physician. 2013 Oct 15;88(8):online.

Clinical Question

What is the best interval for fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) as a screening test for colorectal cancer?

Bottom Line

There appears to be no advantage to obtaining FIT more often than every three years. (Level of Evidence = 1b)

Synopsis

FIT is a way to screen for colorectal cancer, and even in these days of widespread colonoscopy, many patients refuse colonoscopy, so alternatives remain important. Although FIT has a better yield than older guaiac-based tests, repeated rounds of screening are necessary because of limited sensitivity of the test. In this study, 10,698 Dutch residents were invited to participate in a trial comparing four strategies: a single round of screening using two FITs, or a single FIT at baseline and again one, two, or three years later. (There is currently no formal colorectal cancer screening program in the Netherlands.) Approximately 62% of patients responded to the invitation for screening. In the three groups that received a single initial FIT, 8.4% of patients had a positive test result, and 3.3% had advanced neoplasia (colorectal cancer or an adenoma that was at least 10 mm, more than 25% villous histology, or had evidence of dysplasia). In the group that received a pair of FITs at the initial visit, 12.7% of patients had a positive test result and 4.1% had advanced neoplasia. The key finding is that at the second visit, there was no difference between the one-, two-, and three-year interval groups regarding percentage attendance for screening, percentage with a positive test result, or percentage with advanced neoplasia (1.7% to 2.1%). Of 32 colorectal cancers detected in the entire population (based on linkage to a cancer registry), 29 were screen-detected, 22 of which were during the initial round. Better participation in the second round of screening was noted for patients in the biennial and triennial screening intervals compared with those who underwent annual screening.

Study Information

Study design: Randomized controlled trial (nonblinded)

Funding source: Government

Allocation: Concealed

Setting: Population-based

Reference: van Roon AH, Goede SL, van Ballegooijen M, et al. Random comparison of repeated faecal immunochemical testing at different intervals for population-based colorectal cancer screening. Gut. 2013; 62( 3): 409– 415.



 

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


More in AFP


Editor's Collections


Related Content


More in Pubmed

MOST RECENT ISSUE


Sep 15, 2016

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue


Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article