Cochrane for Clinicians

Putting Evidence into Practice

Aclidinium for Stable COPD

 


FREE PREVIEW. AAFP members and paid subscribers: Log in to get free access. All others: Purchase online access.


FREE PREVIEW. Purchase online access to read the full version of this article.

Am Fam Physician. 2015 Jun 1;91(11):760.

Clinical Question

In adults with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), does aclidinium (Tudorza Pressair) decrease exacerbations and mortality or improve quality of life?

Evidence-Based Answer

Aclidinium did not decrease all-cause mortality or exacerbations requiring oral steroids, antibiotics, or both. However, aclidinium decreased the number of patients with exacerbations requiring hospitalization and improved quality of life in those with stable COPD. (Strength of Recommendation: A, based on consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence.)

Practice Pointers

COPD is the third leading cause of death in the United States after cardiovascular disease and malignancy.1 COPD costs $30 billion in direct expenditures and $20 billion in indirect expenditures, such as those associated with work absenteeism and disability.2 As a mainstay of therapy, long-acting bronchodilators are recommended for the treatment of patients with significant symptoms or at high risk of exacerbations.3 The authors looked at the use of aclidinium, an M3 muscarinic receptor–selective, long-acting anticholinergic medication, for the treatment of patients with COPD.

This Cochrane review included 12 randomized controlled trials with 9,547 patients who had stable COPD. Aclidinium did not impact all-cause mortality when compared with placebo (odds ratio [OR] = 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 1.94), nor did it decrease the incidence of exacerbations requiring steroids, antibiotics, or both (OR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.04). Aclidinium was associated with fewer exacerbation-related hospitalizations (OR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.88; number needed to treat [NNT] = 77; 95% CI, 51 to 233) over the length of the studies (from four to 52 weeks). More patients taking aclidinium reported a clinically significant improvement in quality of life when compared with placebo (OR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.70; NNT = 10; 95% CI, 8 to 15), and more patients reported an improvement in dyspnea (OR = 1.73; 95% CI, 1.52 to 1.98). Serious adverse events were similar between aclidinium and placebo (OR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.14). Fewer people in the aclidinium group withdrew because of a lack of effectiveness (OR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.43), although aclidinium was associated with increased reports of diarrhea (OR = 2.32; 95% CI, 1.14 to 4.74).

Aclidinium was also compared with tiotropium (Spiriva), another long-acting muscarinic antagonist. There were no deaths in the head-to-head trials, no statistically significant difference in exacerbations requiring steroids or antibiotics, and no difference in exacerbations requiring hospitalization. No differences were noted in nonfatal serious adverse events between the two medications. Aclidinium is dosed twice daily, whereas tiotropium is given once daily.

The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease recommends smoking cessation, physical activity, and influenza and pneumococcal vaccination for all patients with COPD.3 Pharmacotherapy is recommended to reduce symptoms and improve exercise tolerance.3 As with other long-acting muscarinics, aclidinium is a well-tolerated option for the pharmacologic management of persons with COPD who experience significant symptoms or are at high risk of exacerbations.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.


The practice recommendations in this activity are available at http://summaries.cochrane.org/CD010509.

The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Army or the Department of Defense.

SOURCE:

Ni H, et al. Aclidinium bromide for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(9):CD010509.

REFERENCES

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 10 leading causes of death by age group, United States–2012. http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/pdf/leading_causes_of_death_by_age_group_2012-a.pdf. Accessed April 11, 2015.

2. Guarascio AJ, et al. The clinical and economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the USA. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013;5:23–45.

3. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of COPD, 2015. http://www.goldcopd.org/guidelines-global-strategy-for-diagnosis-management.html. Accessed April 11, 2015.

These are summaries of reviews from the Cochrane Library.

This series is coordinated by Corey D. Fogleman, MD, Assistant Medical Editor.

A collection of Cochrane for Clinicians published in AFP is available at http://www.aafp.org/afp/cochrane.



 

Copyright © 2015 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


More in Pubmed

MOST RECENT ISSUE


Dec 1, 2016

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue


Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article