Diagnosis and Nonsurgical Treatment of DDH in Infants Up to Six Months of Age: Recommendations from the AAOS
Am Fam Physician. 2015 Jun 15;91(12):882.
Key Points for Practice
• Imaging can be obtained in infants younger than six months if they had breech presentation, or have a family history of DDH or a history of clinical instability.
• Ultrasonography can be performed in infants younger than six weeks if they have positive results on instability examination; anteroposterior radiography of the pelvis can replace ultrasonography in infants four months or older.
• Immediate or delayed bracing is warranted in infants with positive results on instability examination.
From the AFP Editors
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) can cause functional impairment and affect quality of life. The exact incidence is unclear, with rates as high as one in 100 newborns who have a hip instability detected clinically and one to 28 in 1,000 infants with hip dislocation requiring treatment. Although the etiology is not known, causes appear to be both genetic and environmental. A higher risk of DDH is found in infants with risk factors such as breech position, family history, and limited hip abduction, among others. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) has provided guidance, based on limited and moderate evidence, on diagnosing and nonsurgical treatments for DDH in infants up to six months of age.
BASED ON MODERATE EVIDENCE
Performing universal screening for DDH with ultrasonography in newborns is not recommended. When comparing universal vs. selective ultrasonography screening, there appears to be no statistically significant difference between the two with regard to diagnosing DDH that presents late. Additionally, universal screening can lead to overtreatment. Imaging can be obtained in infants younger than six months if they had breech presentation, or have a family history of DDH or a history of clinical instability.
BASED ON LIMITED EVIDENCE
Imaging. Ultrasonography can be performed in infants younger than six weeks if they have positive results on instability examination; this imaging can help with making decisions regarding bracing. Anteroposterior radiography of the pelvis can replace ultrasonography in infants four months or older.
Examination. If an infant had normal results on previous hip examination, physicians should perform additional assessments until the infant is six months of age.
Treatment. If an infant has abnormalities found on ultrasonography, but has a clinically stable hip, observation without initiating bracing is supported. However, immediate or delayed (two to nine weeks) bracing is warranted in infants with positive results on instability examination. A von Rosen splint is the preferred brace over the Pavlik harness, Craig brace, and Frejka pillow, because there is some evidence to indicate that rigid bracing may result in increased resolution compared with soft braces. When prescribing bracing, serial physical examinations, and occasional imaging with ultrasonography or radiography, should be performed.
Guideline source: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Evidence rating system used? Yes
Literature search described? Yes
Guideline developed by participants without relevant financial ties to industry? No
Available at: http://www.aaos.org/Research/guidelines/DDHGuideline.asp
LISA HAUK, AFP Senior Associate Editor
Coverage of guidelines from other organizations does not imply endorsement by AFP or the AAFP.
This series is coordinated by Sumi Sexton, MD, Associate Medical Editor.
A collection of Practice Guidelines published in AFP is available at http://www.aafp.org/afp/practguide.
Copyright © 2015 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions
More in AFP
MOST RECENT ISSUE
Jan 15, 2017
Access the latest issue of American Family Physician