Cochrane for Clinicians

Putting Evidence into Practice

The Role of Levetiracetam in Treating Chronic Neuropathic Pain Symptoms


FREE PREVIEW. AAFP members and paid subscribers: Log in to get free access. All others: Purchase online access.

FREE PREVIEW. Purchase online access to read the full version of this article.

Am Fam Physician. 2015 Jul 1;92(1):23-24.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

Clinical Question

In patients with chronic neuropathic pain, does levetiracetam (Keppra) effectively treat pain symptoms?

Evidence-Based Answer

Based on low-quality evidence, levetiracetam was found to be ineffective for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain symptoms. Moreover, patients who were taking levetiracetam experienced adverse effects at a significantly higher rate than those who were taking placebo. (Strength of Recommendation: B, based on inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence.)

Practice Pointers

Chronic neuropathic pain is commonly encountered in primary care, with a prevalence between 7% and 10% in one systematic review.1 By some estimates, the prevalence of such conditions as diabetic neuropathy and postsurgical chronic pain is increasing.2 Chronic pain reduces quality of life, hinders employment, and increases costs and utilization of health care.3 Less than 30% of patients with diabetic neuropathy and less than 13% of patients with fibromyalgia achieve a 50% reduction in pain intensity with available treatments.4 Therefore, interest is high in exploring novel agents that may prove more effective. Levetiracetam is an anticonvulsant with a unique (and not yet fully understood) mode of action that has been investigated as a possible treatment for chronic neuropathic pain.

In this Cochrane review, the authors analyzed the effectiveness and relative safety of levetiracetam in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain in adults. They included only published, high-quality, peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials that compared levetiracetam at any dose with placebo for several different neuropathic pain conditions. The authors used the standardized definitions of moderate and substantial benefit in chronic pain studies from the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT).5 Moderate benefit is defined as at least 30% pain relief over baseline, and substantial benefit is defined as at least 50% pain relief over baseline.

The review included six studies of 344 patients with six different types of neuropathic pain (i.e., central pain caused by multiple sclerosis, pain following spinal cord injury, painful polyneuropathy, central poststroke pain, postherpetic neuralgia, and postmastectomy pain). None of the studies found a significant benefit to pharmacotherapy with levetiracetam for chronic neuropathic pain, although the pooling of data across studies was not possible.

Moreover, 67% of participants experienced adverse effects from levetiracetam therapy compared with 54% of the participants who were taking placebo (number needed to treat to harm = 8). The most commonly reported adverse effects of levetiracetam therapy included fatigue or tiredness, dizziness, headache, constipation, and nausea. Participants in the treatment arm were nearly five times as likely to withdraw from the study because of adverse effects compared with those who were randomized to placebo. Given the lack of benefit, the likelihood of increased adverse effects, and the findings of other research studies suggesting the benefit of alternative agents in chronic neuropathic pain, the authors recommend against using levetiracetam for this indication.

In a review from 2010, the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group of the International Association for the Study of Pain released evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacologic treatment of neuropathic pain.6 These guidelines recommend the use of tricyclic antidepressants, dual reuptake inhibitors of serotonin and norepinephrine, calcium channel alpha-2-delta ligands (e.g., gabapentin [Neurontin], pregabalin [Lyrica]), and topical lidocaine as first-line therapies. According to the guidelines, opioid analgesics and tramadol were considered second-line agents for the treatment of neuropathic pain symptoms.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

The practice recommendations in this activity are available at


Wiffen PJ, Derry S, Moore RA, Lunn MP. Levetiracetam for neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(7):CD010943.


show all references

1. van Hecke O, Austin SK, Khan RA, Smith BH, Torrance N. Neuropathic pain in the general population: a systematic review of epidemiological studies [published correction appears in Pain. 2014;155(9):1907]. Pain. 2014;155(4):654–662....

2. Hall GC, Carroll D, McQuay HJ. Primary care incidence and treatment of four neuropathic pain conditions: a descriptive study, 2002–2005. BMC Fam Pract. 2008;9:26.

3. Andrew R, Derry S, Taylor RS, Straube S, Phillips CJ. The costs and consequences of adequately managed chronic non-cancer pain and chronic neuropathic pain. Pain Pract. 2014;14(1):79–94.

4. Moore A, Derry S, Eccleston C, Kalso E. Expect analgesic failure; pursue analgesic success. BMJ. 2013;346:f2690.

5. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008;9(2):105–121.

6. Dworkin RH, O'Connor AB, Audette J, et al. Recommendations for the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain: an overview and literature update. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(3 suppl):S3–S14.

These are summaries of reviews from the Cochrane Library.

This series is coordinated by Corey D. Fogleman, MD, Assistant Medical Editor.

A collection of Cochrane for Clinicians published in AFP is available at


Copyright © 2015 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

More in AFP

Editor's Collections

Related Content

More in Pubmed


Oct 15, 2016

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue

Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article