Letters to the Editor

Natural Procreative Technology for Treating Infertility

 


FREE PREVIEW. AAFP members and paid subscribers: Log in to get free access. All others: Purchase online access.


FREE PREVIEW. Purchase online access to read the full version of this article.

Am Fam Physician. 2015 Oct 15;92(8):668.

Original Article: Evaluation and Treatment of Infertility

Issue Date: March 1, 2015

See additional reader comments at: http://www.aafp.org/afp/2015/0301/p308.html

to the editor: As a family physician who has worked in the area of infertility for more than 20 years, I was pleased to read an article by two family physicians about the evaluation and treatment of infertility. Family physicians are on the front line of taking care of couples and supporting their future plans for children, and should have the knowledge and expertise to provide guidance to couples who are having problems conceiving.

The American Academy of Fertility Care Professionals is an organization of physicians, nurses, and other health professionals who teach couples to track their fertility using the Creighton Model FertilityCare System. Besides the United States, we have members in 19 other countries. Since 1978, more than 649 physicians have been trained in the medical and surgical applications of natural procreative technology (http://www.naprotechnology.com). With proper training, physicians can diagnose and treat a variety of gynecologic and reproductive problems, including infertility. Two studies demonstrate the success that family physicians can have using this approach to help couples with infertility.1,2

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

REFERENCES

1. Stanford JB, Parnell TA, Boyle PC. Outcomes from treatment of infertility with natural procreative technology in an Irish general practice [published correction appears in J Am Board Fam Med. 2008;21(6):583]. J Am Board Fam Med. 2008;21(5):375–384.

2. Tham E, Schliep K, Stanford J. Natural procreative technology for infertility and recurrent miscarriage: outcomes in a Canadian family practice. Can Fam Physician. 2012;58(5):e267–e274.

editor's note: This letter was sent to the authors of “Evaluation and Treatment of Infertility,” who declined to reply.

 

Send letters to afplet@aafp.org, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680. Include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.

Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.

This series is coordinated by Kenny Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online.



 

Copyright © 2015 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


MOST RECENT ISSUE


Dec 1, 2016

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue


Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article