Venous Samples Are a Less-Painful Starting Point for the Evaluation of Patients with Acute Exacerbation of COPD
Am Fam Physician. 2016 Nov 1;94(9):757.
In patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), is a venous blood sample as useful as an arterial sample?
There is very good agreement between arterial and venous measurements of pH and bicarbonate, and fairly good agreement at higher levels between arterial and peripheral measures of oxygen saturation. These authors suggest an algorithm for patients with acute exacerbation of COPD that includes an arterial blood gas analysis only if the patient's initial pulse oximetry is less than 80% or if the venous pH is less than 7.35, which would obviate the need for two-thirds of arterial blood gasses. A more conservative approach would also include an arterial blood gas analysis for patients with oxygen saturation between 80% and 84%, where there was also some misclassification. (Level of Evidence = 1b)
Arterial blood draws are painful. These British researchers asked, sensibly, whether we could get the same information from a venous blood sample. Specifically, can it identify patients with hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis who are at risk of respiratory failure and worse outcomes? This study included 234 patients (mean age of 71 years) hospitalized for an acute exacerbation of COPD. Patients had arterial and venous samples drawn, and the pain of each procedure was measured using a 10-point visual analog scale. The authors then evaluated the agreement between arterial and venous samples for pH, bicarbonate, and CO2, and between arterial oxygen saturation and oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry.
Overall, agreement was very good between arterial and venous measures of pH (mean difference = 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02 to 0.04) and bicarbonate (mean difference = −0.04 mEq per L; 95% CI, −0.22 to 0.15). The venous CO2 consistently overestimated pCO2 (mean difference of arterial minus venous = −0.75 kPa; 95% CI, −0.89 to −0.61; −5.6 torr; 95% CI, −6.7 to −4.6). Agreement regarding
POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by EssentialEvidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, please see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com. Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.
For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/product/ebm_loe.cfm?show=oxford.
To subscribe to a free podcast of these and other POEMs that appear in AFP, search in iTunes for “POEM of the Week” or go to http://goo.gl/3niWXb.
This series is coordinated by Sumi Sexton, MD, Associate Deputy Editor.
A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at http://www.aafp.org/afp/poems.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions