POEMs

Step-by-Step Approach to Ruling Out Infant Infection Is Accurate

 

Am Fam Physician. 2016 Dec 1;94(11):933.

Clinical Question

Is the Step-by-Step approach useful for ruling out systemic infection in young low-risk infants?

Bottom Line

The Step-by-Step approach, using a basic physical examination and readily available urine and blood tests (without lumbar puncture; see the Synopsis section), can successfully identify low-risk infants younger than 90 days who will not need empiric antibiotic treatment and lumbar puncture. However, this approach has not been studied (nor has any other approach, I believe) in a randomized controlled trial to see whether it is effective at decreasing lumbar punctures or hospital admissions. (Level of Evidence = 1a)

Synopsis

This study was conducted at 11 European pediatric emergency departments. The researchers enrolled 2,185 previously healthy term infants younger than 90 days with fever without source. The relatively new Step-by-Step approach was evaluated in comparison with the Rochester criteria or the Lab-score (Arch Dis Child. 2010;95(12):968–973), both methods of ruling out invasive bacterial infection. All infants were evaluated via urine dipstick, a urine culture, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein level, procalcitonin, and blood culture. Eventually, 4% (n = 87) of the infants were given a diagnosis of systemic infection and approximately 45% (n = 991) were classified as low-risk using the Step-by-Step approach. Sensitivity and negative predictive value for ruling out infection were 92.0% and 99.3% for the Step-by-Step approach, 81.6% and 98.3% for the Rochester criteria, and 59.8% and 98.1% for the Lab-score. Seven of the 991 infants (0.7%) who were classified as low risk by the score were found to have a systemic infection using the Step-by-Step approach.

The Step-by-Step approach: Children at low risk of systemic infection have the following characteristics: not ill-appearing, younger than 21 days, no leukocyturia, procalcitonin level less than 0.5 ng per mL, C-reactive protein level less than 20 mg per L (190.5 nmol per L), and absolute

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by EssentialEvidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, please see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com. Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/product/ebm_loe.cfm?show=oxford.

To subscribe to a free podcast of these and other POEMs that appear in AFP, search in iTunes for “POEM of the Week” or go to http://goo.gl/3niWXb.

This series is coordinated by Sumi Sexton, MD, Associate Deputy Editor.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at http://www.aafp.org/afp/poems.

 

 

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

CME Quiz

More in AFP


Editor's Collections


Related Content


More in Pubmed

MOST RECENT ISSUE


Aug 15, 2017

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue


Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article