Letters to the Editor

Importance of Careful Corneal Inspection Prior to Fluorescein Examination

 

Am Fam Physician. 2017 Apr 1;95(7):412.

Original Article: Evaluation of the Painful Eye

Issue Date: June 15, 2016

See additional reader comments at: http://www.aafp.org/afp/2016/0615/p991.html

to the editor: Pflipsen and colleagues provide an excellent review of the primary care approach to patients with eye pain. They include a useful algorithm to guide the diagnostic evaluation in Figure 2, but I would suggest a slight modification. The premature inclusion of fluorescein staining in the initial diagnostic step may hamper the differentiation of corneal abrasion from corneal ulcer, which has implications for subsequent management.

Most evaluation protocols for suspected corneal pathology include slit lamp examination,1 but this is not readily available in many community primary care settings. Careful inspection of the cornea with good lighting and the aid of an ophthalmoscope or otoscope before applying the fluorescein will often reveal the gray infiltrate that helps distinguish an ulcer from an abrasion. This finding supports urgent ophthalmology referral as opposed to a more conservative approach for a suspected abrasion. Once the fluorescein has been placed, the uptake patterns for an abrasion and an ulcer are often similar, and the inflammatory infiltrate is obscured by the dye. A prospective review of a large number of corneal ulcers indicates a positive correlation between severe ulcers with virulent organisms, such as pseudomonas, and ulcer size at presentation,2 suggesting that the most clinically important ulcers are more likely to be detectable by careful inspection at the initial visit.

Patients with eye pain and foreign body sensation often present initially to family physicians. Most of these patients have a self-limited abrasion that will resolve with conservative management. Appropriate care and efficient use of medical resources hinge on an accurate diagnosis. Careful initial inspection of the cornea for evidence of an ulcer before fluorescein application can facilitate clinical decision making in these cases.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

REFERENCES

1. Garg P, Rao GN. Corneal ulcer: diagnosis and management. Community Eye Health. 1999;12(30):21–23.

2. Mascarenhas M, Srinivasan M, Chen M, et al. Differentiation of etiologic agents of bacterial keratitis from presentation characteristics. Int Ophthalmol. 2012;32(6):531–538.

Send letters to afplet@aafp.org, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680. Include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.

Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.

This series is coordinated by Kenny Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online.

 

 

Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

CME Quiz

MOST RECENT ISSUE


Aug 15, 2017

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue


Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article