Fam Pract Manag. 2001 Feb;8(2):12.
To the Editor:
Kent Moore, author of “ICD-9 Coding: Every Digit Counts” [October 2000, page 16], must be commended for providing a quick refresher on ICD-9 coding and urging physicians to provide fourth- and fifth-digit codes when required.
I would like to add that reimbursement is just one reason for endorsing complete coding. Another equally important reason is the ability to use patient diagnostic records for research purposes – research that may form the backbone of preventive measures for certain health conditions. For example, one cannot accomplish a retrospective study of burns by degree of burn using hospital records unless discharge ICD-9 codes are specified to the fourth and fifth digits. The fourth digit describes the percentage of body surface area affected and the fifth digit describes the percentage of body surface with a third-degree or full skin thickness burn.
Indeed, as Moore pointed out, coding should be done with as much specificity as possible.
WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU
Send your comments to firstname.lastname@example.org. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. We cannot respond to all letters we receive. Those chosen for publication will be edited for length and style.
Copyright © 2001 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions