Advertisement

LETTERS

Fam Pract Manag. 2001 Feb;8(2):12.

Commendable advice

To the Editor:

Kent Moore, author of “ICD-9 Coding: Every Digit Counts” [October 2000, page 16], must be commended for providing a quick refresher on ICD-9 coding and urging physicians to provide fourth- and fifth-digit codes when required.

I would like to add that reimbursement is just one reason for endorsing complete coding. Another equally important reason is the ability to use patient diagnostic records for research purposes – research that may form the backbone of preventive measures for certain health conditions. For example, one cannot accomplish a retrospective study of burns by degree of burn using hospital records unless discharge ICD-9 codes are specified to the fourth and fifth digits. The fourth digit describes the percentage of body surface area affected and the fifth digit describes the percentage of body surface with a third-degree or full skin thickness burn.

Indeed, as Moore pointed out, coding should be done with as much specificity as possible.

WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU
Send your comments to fpmedit@aafp.org. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. We cannot respond to all letters we receive. Those chosen for publication will be edited for length and style.

Article Tools

Printer-friendly

Share this page

FPM CME Quiz

Get Permissions

Search FPM

 

FPM at a Glance

FPM on Facebook FPM on Twitter

INDUSTRY INFORMATION
Advertisement
Advertisement