Coding discrepancies


FREE PREVIEW. AAFP members and paid subscribers: Log in to get free access. All others: Purchase online access.

FREE PREVIEW. Purchase online access to read the full version of this article.

Fam Pract Manag. 2002 Mar;9(3):15.

To the Editor:

I take exception to Dr. Weinman’s comments regarding coding and documentation [Letters, January 2002, page 14]. If the current guidelines are so much easier than biochemistry and can be mastered in one to two weeks, as Dr. Weinman claims, then why was there disagreement on six sample cases coded by five “experts” in the study conducted by Dr. King [King MS, Sharp L, Lipsky M. Accuracy of CPT evaluation and management coding by family physicians. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001;14(3):184–192.]? And why did the coding review panel completely agree only 17 percent of the time in “Test Your Coding Skills” [FPM, February, 2002, page 41]? Unfortunately, when it comes to coding, the only correct answer is that of the auditor.


Send your comments to fpmedit@aafp.org. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. We cannot respond to all letters we receive. Those chosen for publication will be edited for length and style.


Copyright © 2002 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact fpmserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

More in FPM

Editor's Collections

Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free FPM email table of contents and e-newsletter.

Sign Up Now