Time to re-examine physician training
FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.
buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.
Fam Pract Manag. 2002 Mar;9(3):15.
To the Editor:
Your article “Is It Time to Reexamine Family Practice?” [September 2001, page 43] interested me. As a recent graduate of a rural track residency program, I think it is time to re-examine the core requirements of family medicine training.
For instance, what percentage of graduates actually practice obstetrics five years after residency? Instead of catching babies for three months – all the while knowing I had no desire to do it after residency – I could have used two of the three months to get more experience performing colposcopies and implanting IUDs. I also question the value of first-assisting surgeons for three months of training. Post-op care is more important and could be mastered in a fraction of the time spent retracting or holding laparoscopic cameras.
WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU
Send your comments to firstname.lastname@example.org. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. We cannot respond to all letters we receive. Those chosen for publication will be edited for length and style.
Copyright © 2002 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions