Call RVUs: One Way to Make Call More Equitable
By acknowledging that not all call is created equal, one group has made its call schedule less contentious.
It's probably safe to say that few physicians actually enjoy call. It can cause more dissention among physicians than money. And for family physicians, it can be even more intense, given that access is a hallmark of primary care. Call can also be more complicated for family physicians because we "do it all" caring for adults, children, infants, pregnant women, trauma patients, etc. When sharing call with physicians of other specialties, the family doctor can often handle every problem that arises, but other specialties can't always return the favor. For family practice groups in which some physicians do deliveries, call coverage can get even trickier. Then, there's the issue of nurse practitioners, nurse midwives and physician assistants who have to be backed up. Throw in physicians who work only part time, and it's hard to come up with a call system that works and feels right to everyone involved.
KEY POINTS:
|
In a recent survey, 90 percent of physicians said they would not take more call for more money. On a 5-point difficulty scale, with 3 being defined as "an acceptable but fairly demanding part of the job," primary care physicians ranked night call a 2.29 and weekend call a 3.07. The primary care physicians surveyed thought call was worth about $226 on weekdays and $862 for a 48-hour weekend.1,2
Building a call system that works
There are many ways groups can arrange call. Some of the most common models are listed below. While practice management experts could certainly debate the pros and cons of each model, it's helpful to recognize that the exact call scheme is not really that important. What is important is that all the physicians participating feel that the system is fair and administered properly.
|
WHAT'S A DAY
OF CALL WORTH TO YOU?
|
At the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Department of Family Medicine has a very complex set of call parameters for faculty clinicians. A few clinicians take no call at all (and get paid less than the rest of us). There are always two faculty on call simultaneously: one for maternity and newborn care and one for all other inpatient care. Some clinicians take call on both schedules; some take call on only one. Some do a lot of weekends; some do more weekdays.
Like many groups, we struggled with developing a system that distributed call fairly while allowing for personal workstyle differences. The solution we finally discovered was to develop a "call RVU" system. For those who are not familiar with an RVU system, it stands for "relative value units" and is used by Medicare and other third-party payers to determine the comparative worth of physician services based on the amount of resources involved in furnishing each service. For example, a level-I, established-patient office visit has total RVUs of 0.56, while a level-IV, established-patient office visit has total RVUs of 2.18.
To develop RVUs for call coverage, we began by sending out a call ballot to all clinicians in our group who take call. On this ballot, we arbitrarily defined a weeknight of call for the general inpatient service as 1.0 RVU. We then had clinicians vote on the RVUs for other after-hours activities, such as weeknight and weekend maternity and newborn call, weekend inpatient call, nurse midwife backup, evening supervision of a free clinic run by medical students, etc. Then, we averaged the ballots and came up with RVUs for each type of call. (See the "What's a day of call worth to you?".)
How we use call RVUs
Before the start of each academic year, we use a basic computer spreadsheet to distribute call for faculty clinicians. (See "A sample spreadsheet.") Faculty names are listed in rows and types of call are listed in columns. As we input the number of call shifts for each physician under each call type, the spreadsheet automatically figures the total call RVUs for each physician. It does this by multiplying the raw number of calls a clinician has in each category by the appropriate call RVU. Call assignments are then adjusted until the total call RVUs for each clinician are essentially equal for the year. The spreadsheet even makes adjustments for physicians who do not work full time to ensure that they receive the appropriate amount of call. Each clinician may end up with a different distribution among the various kinds of call, but their total call RVUs are equitable. Our staff scheduler manages the spreadsheet and ensures that each clinician takes the correct amount and type of call as specified in the spreadsheet.
| Ninety percent of physicians said they would not take more call for more money. |
| The fact that one clinician may not take Friday night call for religious reasons is not an issue. |
This system has helped us make sense out of a complex call system. The fact that one clinician may not take Friday night call for religious reasons, for example, is not an issue. By taking more weeknight call, which has a lower RVU value, he can still carry his equal share of call RVUs for the year. In the same way, it is OK that some clinicians do more weekend call (inherent in doing a two-week stint as inpatient attending) because they will have to do almost no weeknight call.
One inequity we have not been able to correct entirely involves our clinicians who take maternity and newborn call. As a group, these physicians have higher call RVUs than the clinicians not doing obstetrics, but it is by their choice. In many cases, those clinicians doing obstetrics also want to participate in inpatient attending, which raises their RVUs, and we do not want to discourage this. Ultimately, we may offer a maternity and newborn call bonus to reward these physicians for their additional effort.
|
A VARIETY OF
CALL SCHEMES
|
Getting docs on board
Physician buy-in is always important in a medical group, particularly when you're dealing with contentious issues such as call coverage. Because our clinicians took part in developing the group's call RVUs, they have a greater sense of control and ownership over the new system. It is their system, not one imposed on them.
|
A SAMPLE SPREADSHEET
The spreadsheet shown here is modeled after the one used in the author's practice to calculate physicians' call relative value units (RVUs) and distribute call more equitably. For the sake of simplification, some items from the practice's actual spreadsheet have been deleted, such as RVUs for nurse midwife backup and supervision of a free health clinic. In addition, the physicians' actual call assignments have been replaced with fictitious data. The spreadsheet calculates physicians' total call RVUs by multiplying the raw number of calls by the accompanying RVU. Total call RVUs are then adjusted by the physician's full-time equivalent (FTE) status. For example, for "Dr. A," the calculation would be as follows: (8 shifts x 6.34 RVUs) + (2 days x 1.0 RVU) = 53 total RVUs; 53 total call RVUs/.80 FTE = 66 adjusted call RVUs. Physicians may download a copy of the Excel spreadsheet to adapt for use in their own practices.
*FTE = "Full-time equivalent"
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overall, physician acceptance of the call RVU system has
been very good. It gives physicians credit for the work they do and a choice
about how they want to accomplish their fair share. It provides objectivity to
a potentially emotional issue. And it is a relatively simple solution that
physician groups of all shapes and sizes can implement.
- Night and weekend call: tough but manageable. The Physician's Advisory. Conshohocken, Pa: Advisory Publications; September 2000:4-6.
- How much is call coverage worth? The Physician's Advisory. Conshohocken, Pa: Advisory Publications; October 2000:4-5.
Dr. Daugird is vice chair, director of clinical services and associate professor at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Department of Family Medicine. Conflicts of interest: none reported.
Send comments to fpmedit@aafp.org.
Copyright © 2002 by the American Academy of
Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it
online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for
his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise
be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any
medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by
the AAFP. Contact fpmserv@aafp.org for
copyright questions and/or permission requests.
MEDLINE:
• Citation
RELATED TOPICS:
Practice processes (214)
Group Practice (21)
Personnel Staffing and Scheduling (6)
Physicians, Family (34)








