Fam Pract Manag. 2005 Mar;12(3):14-19.
To the Editor:
Once again family physicians need to stand united. We failed to do so against the large insurers and managed care, and look where that got us. Now we need to band together and explain that if not for the diplomates there would be no American Board of Family Medicine.
I would like to know how many in the ABFM hierarchy have to bother with the maintenance of certification requirements. I suspect many have given up active practice. Perhaps if more had to be subjected to the process there would be improved communication and responsiveness on the part of the organization.
Perhaps we could ease our burdens by allowing the maintenance of certification process to be completed in a seven- to 10-year cycle. If a diplomate manages to fulfill those requirements in six years, he or she could have a one- or two-year grace period in each cycle to lay low before recertification starts all over again.
The ABFM needs to think outside the box, look at what is being required by other boards and find some middle ground. I am all for practicing great medicine and improving care, but at what cost?
WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU
Send your comments to firstname.lastname@example.org. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. We cannot respond to all letters we receive. Those chosen for publication will be edited for length and style.
Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions