Bigger is better
FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.
buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.
Fam Pract Manag. 2005 Apr;12(4):20.
To the Editor:
Dr. Louis Spikol’s article “Purchasing an Affordable Electronic Health Record” [February 2005, page 31] speaks to how the more affordable EHRs allow small offices most of the advantages of big systems. However, when it comes to return on investment, bigger EHR systems are probably better.1 Our three-physician practice serves a community of about 25,000 people. I used SOAPware for several months before throwing it into the garbage can and upgrading to a more expensive system. There really is no comparison. SOAPware did not allow for better workflows, decrease costs or provide decision support at the point of care. Bottom line, it ended up costing me a lot of time and money.
1. Wang SJ, Middleton B, Prosser LA, et al. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am J Med. 2003;114(5):397–403.
WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU
Send your comments to firstname.lastname@example.org. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. We cannot respond to all letters we receive. Those chosen for publication will be edited for length and style.
Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions