Jul-Aug 2006 Table of Contents

LETTERS

Fam Pract Manag. 2006 Jul-Aug;13(7):16-19.

The pros and cons of sole proprietorship



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

As an attorney who specializes in asset protection and estate planning, I am concerned about an article published in your journal on how to structure a medical practice [“Choosing the Right Practice Entity,” November/December 2005]. In the article, the author suggests that solo physicians should be sole proprietors. This suggestion sets up physicians and attorneys for tremendous liability. Put simply, if someone slips and falls on the practice’s grounds or is sexually harassed by one of the employees, the sole proprietor will be sued personally. If the practice is structured as a professional corporation, S or C corporation, or a limited liability partnership, the assets of the company, rather than the physician’s assets, would be at risk in such cases. Additionally, there are several tax advantages to being treated as either an S or C corporation.

Author’s response:

At the end of my article, I stated that although I usually recommend a sole proprietorship for a physician who does not anticipate practicing with another physician, it’s always best to take the time to evaluate the pros and cons. A sole proprietorship makes sense for a physician who is concerned about what it will cost to set up and maintain a corporation, prefers a draw instead of a salary, does not anticipate hiring a midlevel provider and will have mostly part-time clerical employees, has plenty of nonprofessional liability insurance including an umbrella policy and has a lease or line of credit that would typically require a personal guarantee even if he or she had incorporated. No attorney who recommends this approach would be subject to liability. Of course I would explain to the client that there is potential personal liability for a slip-and-fall accident on the premises, but I would add that I have been practicing health care law for more than 20 years and have never had a client who was liable for a slip-and-fall accident in excess of insurance. In addition, there are typically few or no tax benefits for incorporating a sole proprietorship unless certain unique circumstances exist.

WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU

Send your comments to fpmedit@aafp.org. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. We cannot respond to all letters we receive. Those chosen for publication will be edited for length and style.

Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact fpmserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • FPM CME Quiz

Information From Industry