FROM THE EDITOR
Being All Things to All Patients
FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.
buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.
You can do it all, or do some of it better.
Fam Pract Manag. 2008 May;15(5):6.
The April Harvard Business Review contains an article that caught my eye because its title – “The Four Things a Service Business Must Get Right” – made it seem applicable to the typical family medicine practice.1 While the article as a whole offers useful advice, one passage in particular seems to have “family medicine” written all over it: “Inevitably, companies that attempt to be all things to all people begin to struggle when upstart competitors … start picking off profitable niches.” According to the article, trying to provide a complete range of services is incompatible with achieving excellence in any of them. In other words, a competitor focused on any one of the services you provide might do it better. Compared with your practice, for instance, a retail clinic may be able to provide better access for minor problems, a hospitalist practice may be able to provide better hospital care, a care-management company may be able to provide better follow-up for patients with diabetes, etc.
The solution, according to the article, is to become “multifocused,” providing excellent service in several niche areas across your range of services instead of trying to do it all, especially if your areas of focus can all be supported by the same infrastructure for economies of scale. It's easy to imagine how some organizations could do that, but can a family practice do it and still offer something that could be called family medicine?
It may be a stretch to say this article applies to the typical practice, given that the author was writing about service companies in other industries. Still, applying it does suggest potentially productive questions: What parts of your current range of services would you focus on? Which might you give up to focus more energy on others? Which services fit well together and which don't? Would you emphasize prevention and chronic disease care? Would a practice focused on hospital care and house calls work better than one focused on hospital care and office practice? (Would you even need exam rooms?)
I don't know the answers, but it stimulates the imagination to think about multifocused practice configurations, and it's nice to think that family physicians might not need to be the 97-pound generalists getting sand kicked in their face by every niche bully to come by.
Robert Edsall, Editor-in-Chief
1. Frei FX. The four things a service business must get right. Harv Bus Rev. April2008:70–80.
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions