Playing by the E/M rules
FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.
buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.
Fam Pract Manag. 2008 Jul-Aug;15(7):14.
I have a question regarding “A Multiple-Service Rule for E/M Services” [Opinion, June 2008] by Nancy Ness, MD: When can we start?
Dr. Ness' brilliant idea addresses many of the questions and problems associated with the great inequity in medical reimbursement in one fell swoop.
Why do we allow gross underrepresentation of primary care specialties on the committee that determines relative value units? Why are multiple procedures reimbursed while multiple problems are not? Why are procedures reimbursed at a much higher rate than cognitive work? Why are cardiologists, ENTs, etc., paid three to five times more than we are? Why are medical students abandoning primary care and going into higher-paying specialities? Why is there projected to be a massive shortage of primary care physicians to care for our elderly?
The AAFP needs to champion this idea with all its might.
I have just one word for Dr. Ness' article … brilliant!
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions