What do you think?

This issue of Family Practice Management looks different from the ones you're used to getting. And the differences go beyond looks. In honor of our fifth anniversary, we've made several changes, including these:

• We've modified the design throughout,
• We've added new departments,
• We've increased the number of Speedbar summaries,
• We've shortened articles.

We would appreciate your feedback. After you've had a chance to read the issue, please complete the short survey below and fax it back to us. You'll help guide our continuing efforts at improvement.

(Press the "PRINT" button on your browser, then complete the survey and fax it back to us.)

---

1. What is your overall impression of the new version of FPM you're holding? (For instance, is it readable, useful, attractive? Is it really an improvement?)

2. What do you like most about the new FPM?

3. What do you like least about it?

For each of the following questions, check the one box that most nearly reflects your opinion:	Strongly agree	Agree	Neutral or undecided	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The new cover is attractive.
Giving page numbers on the cover is a significant improvement.
The table of contents (pages 5 and 6) makes it easy to identify articles I want to read.
The articles are easy to read.
The department "Practice Diary" (page 54) is one I'll be likely to read often.
The department "Improving Patient Care" (page 56) is one I'll be likely to read often.
The department "Computers" (page 58) is one I'll be likely to read often.
The department "Balancing Act" (page 68) is one I'll be likely to read often.
Overall, the changes in FPM have improved it.

Please use the space below for any comments you would like to add.

Please fax a copy of this survey to Robert L. Edsall, Editor-in-Chief, FPM, 816-333-0303 or mail it to him at 8880 Ward Parkway, Kansas City, MO 64114. Thank you!