June 2002 Volume 8 Number 6 |
|||
Cancer & the FP
![]() |
" Life's not fair!" You've heard that expression so often that it just seems trite. But when it comes to health, no other truism says it better. For if you're born into life with brown skin or almond-shaped eyes -- or any of a number of other gene complements -- you might be more likely to suffer from certain diseases. And you might get less effective care.
Study after study has demonstrated that health disparities exist among specific patient groups. The phenomenon is twofold: Certain diseases occur more often in certain racial and ethnic populations, as well as in people in the lower socioeconomic tiers. And disparate levels of care are accorded these different groups.
EXTENT OF THE PROBLEM
These disparities involve numerous chronic and acute health conditions, including many types of cancer. A few statistics help illuminate the extent of the problem:
NO EASY FIX
Unfortunately, there's no easy fix, said M. Norman Oliver, M.D., of Charlottesville, Va. Oliver, assistant professor of family medicine and director of the Center for Improving Minority Health at the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, recently presented "Racism and Racialism: The Impact on Cancer Disparities in America" at a conference on reducing health disparities. He advocates a systemic approach to the problem.
"Those cancers that you could directly relate to some sort of genetic difference actually make up only a small portion" of the overall cancer picture, said Oliver. "It's more than the genetics; it's more than the individual practices. It goes well beyond what the individual physician can do. It's changing policy. When you look at racial and ethnic disparities, you'll find that although some of these cancers do occur more frequently in certain groups, it's much more likely that they're related to social factors."
Lack of access to care, suboptimal nutrition and exercise practices, and difficulty in establishing rapport with health professionals are some of the factors Oliver cited.
LONG-TERM SOLUTIONS
Some physicians feel that one way out of the disparity-of-care quagmire is to get more minority physicians into practice.
Diego Osuna, M.D., M.P.H., agrees with this viewpoint. He's medical director of Latino services at Colorado Kaiser Permanente and a senior instructor at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center in Denver, and is a frequent participant in AAFP's e-mail discussion group on minority health issues. In a recent interview, he cited these reasons:
"When a Hispanic patient sees a Hispanic doctor, there's a certain amount of inherent trust," said Osuna. The shared background means the patient is more likely to share critical health information.
Osuna said he'll soon be serving on the admissions committee for the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver. He encouraged other minority physicians to do the same. "Often, they (admissions committees) are seeking input from practicing physicians who recognize the worth of minority applicants," he said.
But Joshua Freeman, M.D., chair of the family medicine department at the University of Kansas Medical Center in Kansas City and another participant in the e-mail discussion on health care disparities, wrote that the problem goes deeper. "The committee can only admit who applies," he said. When Freeman served on the admissions committee for the College of Medicine at the University of Illinois at Chicago, he saw a shortage of qualified minority applicants. "That's where pipeline programs in colleges, high schools and middle schools become critically important," he said.
(For more on recruiting minorities, see "The Color of Medicine: Strategies for Increasing Diversity in the Workforce" at http://www.commmunitycatalyst.org/index.php3?fldID=143.)
CONTINUITY COUNTS
Another tool for lessening disparities is continuity of care. "Screening for cancers is greatly improved when patients have a usual source of care," Oliver said. It's not so much a matter of looking for particular conditions in particular patients. Instead, continuity of care facilitates detection of cancer at an early, more treatable stage. "You'll see patterns when you're doing the family history. Patients who have a significant history -- like having four relatives with breast cancer -- those are the ones you really want to discuss this with," he said.
"Practices vary in their racial and ethnic makeup, and the evidence shows that FPs are quite good at providing screening for their racially and ethnically diverse patients," said Oliver. "We have to continue to emphasize this general clinical attitude of doing thorough preventive screening in all patients."
FP Report is published by the
AAFP News Department.
Copyright © 2002 by
American Academy of Family Physicians.