NOTE: If you have a financial relationship with a drug or device maker relevant to the topic of the manuscript, please check with our editorial office at email@example.com before doing your review. [Example: you are on the speakers’ bureau for a company that makes drugs for diabetes, and the manuscript is about diabetes].
We ask for your help in making this manuscript a current, high-quality presentation on the topic.
You will be asked to provide detailed comments to the authors.
We also ask that you rate key aspects of the manuscript on a rating scale in Editorial Manager(www.editorialmanager.com), our online peer review system. We use these ratings to get a composite, semi-quantitative sense of the external reviews.
To give you an idea of what reviews for AFP look like, here is a set of five reviews(15 page PDF) on a manuscript on iron deficiency anemia (two from AFP medical editors, and three from external reviewers). For the sake of completeness, we also include the author’s responses to the reviews, as outlined in the resubmission letter. [The reviewers and author involved have given us permission to post these reviews and responses, which in AFP are done anonymously.]
Share this page
Alert: Message field is required.
You must sign in before you can share a page on AAFP connection.