AAFP to Congress: 'Section 747 Works'
Boost Title VII Funding to Improve Health Care Quality, Lower Costs
By News Staff
4/7/2006
Citing a March 1 article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the AAFP statement notes that community health centers, or CHCs, have an ongoing, serious shortage of primary care physicians to care for the medically underserved and uninsured. An unpublished 2006 study from the University of California, San Francisco, and the Robert Graham Center in Washington found that nearly 4,000 family and primary care physicians who had been exposed to programs supported by Title VII funding as medical students subsequently opted to work in a CHC.
Without Section 747 funding, CHCs likely would have "twice as many vacancies," the statement says. The Bush administration has expressed an interest in expanding CHC programs around the country.
Moreover, data demonstrate that increasing the number and proportion of primary care physicians improves health outcomes and lowers costs, the statement continues.
"Section 747 plays a role in lowering our nation's health care costs and increasing the quality of U.S. health care," the statement says. Citing an article in Health Affairs, the statement notes that spending more on Medicare actually lowered the quality of care.
Why? Data showed that "expensive health care did not improve patient satisfaction or outcomes" and "the makeup of the health care workforce made a difference: more primary care doctors in a state meant high quality care and lower cost. In contrast, more specialists and fewer generalists led to lower quality and higher costs," the statement notes.
A second Health Affairs study showed a negative relationship between the supply of primary care physicians and overall mortality. Specifically, adding one primary care physician per 10,000 people was associated with a decrease of 34.6 deaths per 100,000 people, the AAFP statement says.
The studies "make an irrefutable case for funding Section 747," the statement concludes. "Section 747 works."
In addition to calling for support of primary care education, the Academy urged Congress to budget $440 million for AHRQ. Without adequate support, AHRQ cannot continue translating research into pragmatic medical care, according to the statement.
"AHRQ has long supported research on conditions that affect most people," the statement says. "Most Americans get their medical care in doctors' offices and clinics. However, most medical research comes from the study of extremely ill people in hospitals. AHRQ studies and supports research on the types of illness that trouble most people. In brief, AHRQ looks at the problems that bring people to their doctors every day -- not the problems that send them to the hospital."
AAFP Letter to House Speaker Expresses Support for Reform Legislation
MedPAC Members Call RBRVS System Subjective, 'Deeply Flawed'
AAFP Leaders Make Case for Family Medicine in Capitol Hill Visits
Legislation Providing Permanent SGR Fix Dies in Senate
Legislation Could Fix SGR Formula
AAFP Supports Rural Physician Legislation
AAFP Leaders, Obama Discuss Health Care Reform in White House Meeting
AAFP President Praises Senate Bill, But Has Some Concerns
Physician Groups Call On Congress to Replace SGR
Obama Rallies Health Care Reform Support
Monday Last Opportunity to Comment on Fee Schedule
Primary Care Key Component of Health Care Reform
AAFP Leaders Engage White House Officials on Reform
Roundtable on Reform Spotlights Primary Care
AAFP Comments on Physician Fee Schedule
Stimulus Funds Help Health Centers
Medicaid EHR Bonus Provides Stimulus
Final Approval Lacking for Medical Home Project
AAFP Board Chair Makes Case for Health Care Reform on Capitol Hill
FP Praises Health IT Bill in Congressional Testimony
Obama Pushes for Health Care Reform in Prime Time News Conference
PCPCC: Feds Call Primary Care 'Fundamental' to Reform








