American Academy of Family Physicians

Printer-friendly version

Share this on AAFP Connection

Share this page

Colorado Governor Vetoes Bill on Standardized Health Plan Contracts

By Leslie Champlin

Citing "unnecessary intrusion by the government," Colorado Gov. Bill Owens vetoed S.B. 198, a bill that would have ensured transparency in contracts between family physicians and health insurance companies in Colorado. The May 26 veto dashed hopes that Colorado would become the first state to require health plans to disclose all the terms of contracts offered to participating physicians.

contract image
Raquel Alexander, C.A.E., executive vice president of the Colorado AFP, which strongly supported the legislation, expressed dismay that the governor vetoed the bill despite solid support for it in the Colorado legislature. "Eighty-five out of 100 legislators supported this bill, and the governor still vetoed it," she said.

But the governor's action won't stop the Colorado AFP from continuing to work for transparency in health plans, she said.

"Family physicians really needed this legislation," said Alexander. "We’ll work in any way that is needed," whether through legislation in the next Colorado session or negotiation with private plans, to implement the intent of the legislation.

If S.B. 198 had passed, health plans' physician contracts would have been required to
  • disclose fee schedules for physician compensation, including the method, calculation or policy affecting actual compensation;
  • end use of additional fee schedules, manuals or other documents used to modify the contract, unless the physician had agreed to such changes in writing at least 30 days before the modification was implemented; and
  • describe the system for resolving payment or other disputes and the time by which disputes would be resolved.
"In its final form, S.B. 198 creates an unnecessary intrusion by the government into the contracts between private parties," said Owens in his May 26 veto message. "The bill dictates contract terms."

During debate on the bill, supporters consistently refuted the governor's contention.
"This is not true," said the AAFP's Colorado-specific Speak Out Action Alert on the issue. "These very profitable, huge insurers have legal departments and large staffs and write contracts that are obfuscated, unfair and presented to a doctor with a 'take it or leave it' attitude. Contracts are changed without notification to the doctor. Unsuspecting physicians find themselves participating in plans that are cleverly hidden in the contract for the MCO's plan with which they did sign.

"A family physician may need to deal with 10 or more insurance companies, all with differing rules, contracts, fees and benefits. A small primary care physician cannot afford nor find the expert attorneys to review such contracts."

Alfred Gilchrist, executive director of the Colorado Medical Society, agreed. "This is purely a disclosure bill," he said at the time the bill was being debated in the Colorado legislature. "It doesn't violate the health plans' right to contract with physicians or to negotiate. It lets physicians compare apples to apples and oranges to oranges."

The Colorado AFP will work with the Colorado Medical Society on next steps on the issue, said Alexander.

S.B. 198 was seen as a potential model for contracts legislation in other states, according to Diana Ewert, AAFP senior manager for state government relations. Texas physicians have worked for three years to pass similar legislation, and several other state chapters have expressed interest in the outcome of S.B. 198.

Likewise, the Academy's state government relations staff "will be looking at whether it (S.B. 198) could be replicable in other states that have an interest in contract legislation," said Ewert.

Share this on AAFP Connection

Search AAFP News Now

 

Government & Medicine

Fee-For-Service Is Here to Stay for Now, Says Policy Expert

Legislators Air Differing Views on Health Care Reform

OTC Prescription Provision Creates Burden

House Bill Would Reform Medicare Payment

Pharmacists Prescribing? Absolutely Not, Says AAFP

AAFP, Others Asks CMS to Re-evaluate Penalty Timelines

Proposed CMS Rule on Overpayment Creates Difficulties

Nurse Education Demo Must Focus on Primary Care, Says AAFP

FP Advocacy Focus of Recent Visit to Capitol Hill

Funding Needed for Family Medicine Programs

Permanently Adopting Primary Care Pay Hike Could Save Billions

Study Highlights Role of CHCs in Health Care System

Ensuring Access to GME Is Focus of Message on Capitol Hill

Congress Passes Payment Patch, Fails to Repeal SGR

AAFP Continues to Press for SGR Repeal on Capitol Hill

Groups Demand That Congress Fix the SGR

PCMH Is Answer to Medicare Payment Problems

Physician Groups Unite to Call for SGR Repeal

Threatened Medicare Payment Cuts Cause Chaos for FPs

AAFP, Medical Organizations Push for SGR Repeal

Focus of Conference Call is Shared Savings, Advance Payment

AAFP Renews Push for SGR Fix

FPs Can Expect Slight Changes in Medicare Pay for 2012

HHS Approach to Essential Health Benefits Falls Flat

CMS Delays Implementation of 'Sunshine Act'

Congress Works Out Temporary Solution to SGR Cut

Community-based Residencies Would Benefit From House Bill

GME Funding to Remain Level in 2012

House Rejects Measure to Block Medicare Pay Cut

House Addresses Medicare Payment Cut

AAFP Backs Tavenner as New CMS Administrator

Supercommittee Fails to Address SGR

Overcoming Scarce Resources to Enact Health Care Reform

Medicare Payment: Value Is as Important as Volume

AAFP President-elect Makes Return Visit to Capitol Hill

Insurance Exchanges, CO-OPs Might Provide Opportunity for FPs

AAFP Members Speak Out on Title VII Funding

Campaign Addresses Need for Medicare Payment Reform

AAFP Continues to Press Congress for Payment Solution

AAFP Leaders Take On Washington

Campaign Focuses on GME Outreach

'Family Medicine Matters,' AAFP Members Tell Congress

AAFP Outlines Suggested Changes for CO-OP Program

Groups Call on Supercommittee to Address Medical Liability Reform

Grassroots Efforts to Repeal SGR Continue

Bill Linking Mandatory Education to Prescribing Not Needed

Blended Payment Model Gives Boost to Primary Care Services

AAFP Joins AMA, Other Groups in Calling for SGR Repeal

Eliminating SGR May Come With High Price

Tobacco Oversight Must Include Cigars, Say AAFP, Other Groups

AAFP Rallies Congress of Delegates on Medicare Payment

AMA Task Force Focuses on Fixing the SGR

2012 Physician Fee Schedule Needs Work, Says AAFP

New Task Force Takes Steps to Better Value Primary Care

Deficit-reduction Plan Must Eliminate SGR, Says AAFP

Physicians File Lawsuit Over RUC, CMS Relationship

Policy Brief Explains HHS Insurance Exchange Plans

Deficit-reduction Plan Falls Short, Says AAFP President

YouTube Video Designed to Encourage SGR Repeal