Groups Urge House to Adopt Senate's Title VII Funding Levels
By Joel B. Finkelstein
6/13/2006
The funding situation could have been worse if the House had not shifted $4.1 billion from the defense and foreign operations programs, but even that somewhat larger amount still is not enough to continue adequate support for Title VII and other programs, said Marcia Mabee, Ph.D., executive director of the Coalition for Health Funding.
“What that essentially does is flat(ten) funds; it is just the same exact amount of money as they provided in last year’s appropriation bill. As you know, what happened with that level of funding to Title VII was a two-thirds cut to the program,” Mabee said.
In a May 8 letter (PDF file: 17 pages / 72 KB. More about PDFs.)co-signed by more than 800 organizations, including the AAFP, the Coalition for Health Funding and the Committee for Education Funding urged Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., to match the Senate funding amount.
“America cannot sustain its global scientific and economic leadership, national security and citizens’ health and well-being without increasing these investments,” the letter stated. “While our organizations represent a wide array of domestic priorities, we are united in our effort to advance the bipartisan goal of adding $7 billion in discretionary funding for health, education, labor enforcement, job training and social services programs as the budget process moves forward.”
However, that viewpoint has yet to move House appropriators, who have agreed to comply with the president’s $873 billion limit on discretionary spending.
“The big issue for them and for the whole Congress is the overall budget cap on discretionary spending. We have been trying to bust that cap so that we’re not shifting money away from other needs to fund our needs,” said Mabee.
Other areas still suffer under the current budget outlook.
The president’s request calls for an overall $4.2 billion in cuts to the Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education and Related Agencies budget. Under the proposal, NIH funding would remain frozen at $28.43 billion, a $66 million cut from fiscal year 2005.
House OKs Bill to Help Small Practices Buy Health IT
AAFP Applauds House Passage of SGR Bill
AAFP Puts Muscle Behind Support for Bill to Fix SGR Formula
AAFP Continues to Press Congress on Health Care Reform
AAFP Letter to House Speaker Expresses Support for Reform Legislation
MedPAC Members Call RBRVS System Subjective, 'Deeply Flawed'
AAFP Leaders Make Case for Family Medicine in Capitol Hill Visits
Legislation Providing Permanent SGR Fix Dies in Senate
Legislation Could Fix SGR Formula
AAFP Supports Rural Physician Legislation
AAFP Leaders, Obama Discuss Health Care Reform in White House Meeting
AAFP President Praises Senate Bill, But Has Some Concerns
Physician Groups Call On Congress to Replace SGR
Obama Rallies Health Care Reform Support
Monday Last Opportunity to Comment on Fee Schedule
Primary Care Key Component of Health Care Reform
AAFP Leaders Engage White House Officials on Reform
Roundtable on Reform Spotlights Primary Care
AAFP Comments on Physician Fee Schedule
Stimulus Funds Help Health Centers
Medicaid EHR Bonus Provides Stimulus
Final Approval Lacking for Medical Home Project
AAFP Board Chair Makes Case for Health Care Reform on Capitol Hill
FP Praises Health IT Bill in Congressional Testimony
Obama Pushes for Health Care Reform in Prime Time News Conference
PCPCC: Feds Call Primary Care 'Fundamental' to Reform
AAFP to Congress: 'Section 747 Works': Boost Title VII Funding to Improve Health Care Quality, Lower Costs
(4/7/2006)
Budget Amendment May Restore Title VII Funding
(3/29/2006)








