Senate Sets Up Fight on Title VII Funds
Bill Conference Not Likely Until Fall
By Joel B. Finkelstein
8/4/2006
“While the increase for (primary care training) is on top of a substantial cut in funding last year, the fact that we received an increase at all is a testament to the numerous calls made by our key contacts to their senators,” said Susan Hildebrandt, assistant director of AAFP’s Government Relations Division.
Section 747 of Title VII provides the only federal grants for training family physicians. Those funds help ensure there are enough family physicians working in underserved areas.
Community health centers, many of them in those underserved areas, would receive a boost of $145 million more than in 2006, to $1.9 billion in 2007.
The Senate budget includes $304 million for health professions programs, compared with $295 million in 2006. All of the increase went to boost funding for Title VII. Nursing education funding, appropriated as part of Title VIII, is set at the same level as in 2006.
“While we understand there are many competing priorities in the fiscal year 2007 bill, we fear that the enacted and proposed cuts to the health professions programs will exacerbate current and future health care challenges and will impact our nation’s most vulnerable communities,” says a July 10 letter (PDF file: 3 Pages/248 KB. More about PDFs.) to Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., from the Health Professions and Nursing Education Coalition, of which the Academy is a member. Specter chairs the Senate Subcommittee on Labor, HHS, Education and Related Agencies.
Overall, the Senate’s budget includes $142.8 billion in spending, a figure that exceeds President Bush’s budget request and the package passed by the House of Representatives by more than $5 billion. Some members of the Senate would like to see that number rise by another $2 billion before the bill is sent to conference, where it will have to be consolidated with the House measure. Those meetings with the House are not expected to happen until after the November elections.
Some of that new money also could be used to increase Title VII funding and help primary care education.
According to media reports, Specter told the appropriations committee that the remaining cuts in the bill represent “the disintegration of the appropriate federal role in health, education and worker protections.”
AAFP Applauds House Passage of SGR Bill
AAFP Puts Muscle Behind Support for Bill to Fix SGR Formula
AAFP Continues to Press Congress on Health Care Reform
AAFP Letter to House Speaker Expresses Support for Reform Legislation
MedPAC Members Call RBRVS System Subjective, 'Deeply Flawed'
AAFP Leaders Make Case for Family Medicine in Capitol Hill Visits
Legislation Providing Permanent SGR Fix Dies in Senate
Legislation Could Fix SGR Formula
AAFP Supports Rural Physician Legislation
AAFP Leaders, Obama Discuss Health Care Reform in White House Meeting
AAFP President Praises Senate Bill, But Has Some Concerns
Physician Groups Call On Congress to Replace SGR
Obama Rallies Health Care Reform Support
Monday Last Opportunity to Comment on Fee Schedule
Primary Care Key Component of Health Care Reform
AAFP Leaders Engage White House Officials on Reform
Roundtable on Reform Spotlights Primary Care
AAFP Comments on Physician Fee Schedule
Stimulus Funds Help Health Centers
Medicaid EHR Bonus Provides Stimulus
Final Approval Lacking for Medical Home Project
AAFP Board Chair Makes Case for Health Care Reform on Capitol Hill
FP Praises Health IT Bill in Congressional Testimony
Obama Pushes for Health Care Reform in Prime Time News Conference
PCPCC: Feds Call Primary Care 'Fundamental' to Reform
Funding New CHCs Not Complete Solution, Say FPs
(6/29/2006)
Groups Urge House to Adopt Senate’s Title VII Funding Levels
(6/13/2006)








