American Academy of Family Physicians

Printer-friendly version

Share this on AAFP Connection

Share this page

MedPAC to Congress

Alter Payment, Delivery Systems to Promote Primary Care Services

By James Arvantes  • Washington

The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, or MedPAC, has endorsed two key recommendations that, if approved by Congress, would shift the focus of the Medicare program toward a more primary care-based system.
Stylized image of a house, with
During an April 9 meeting here, MedPAC voted to recommend to Congress two separate but interrelated proposals that would alter Medicare's payment and delivery systems to promote the use of primary care services. The first proposal calls on Congress to increase payments for services provided by primary care providers; the second proposal advises Congress to initiate a three-year, $400 million medical home pilot project to improve health care quality, enhance care coordination and save costs.

MedPAC will submit the recommendations to Congress as part of its June report, but the proposals already may be influencing federal lawmakers. Reportedly, Senate Finance Committee Chair Max Baucus, D-Mont., will seek an increase in Medicare payment levels for primary care providers as part of a Medicare payment bill the committee expects to draft within the next several weeks.

"The first initiative, the fee schedule adjustment, focuses on primary care services provided by clinicians who predominantly provide primary care," said Cristina Boccuti, M.P.P., a senior MedPAC analyst. "The second initiative, the medical home pilot, focuses on other activities, such as care coordination."

If approved by Congress, the two recommendations would represent a major turning point for primary care, perhaps ushering in a new era of valuing and paying for primary care services in the public and private sectors. Increasing the use of primary care services "can improve the efficiency of delivery without compromising quality," said Boccuti. "Primary care services have become undervalued over time, and they risk being underprovided," she added.

Fee Schedule Adjustment

The fee schedule adjustment recommendation does not specify how big an increase primary care providers should receive, but there are "two precedents," for determining the amount, said Kevin Hayes, Ph.D., principle policy analyst for MedPAC. They are the 10 percent bonus Medicare pays to physicians working in designated health professional shortage areas and the 5 percent bonus paid to providers in physician scarcity areas, he noted.

"In making a judgment about an adjustment for primary care, Congress could consider these precedents -- at least as a starting point," Hayes said.

MedPAC proposes to pay for the recommendation by establishing a "budget-neutral payment adjustment for primary care services billed under the physician fee schedule and furnished by primary care-focused practitioners," according to the text of the proposal. To maintain budget neutrality, the proposal would take money from subspecialty services to pay for the increase for primary care services.

Thomas Dean, M.D., of Wessington Springs, S.D., the only family physician serving on MedPAC, endorsed the recommendation, saying "it is an appropriate first step and something that we need to do and, hopefully, can do relatively quickly."

Commission member Nicholas Wolter, M.D., a pulmonary medicine and critical care physician from Billings, Mont., also voted for the recommendation, but he said the proposal should not stipulate budget neutrality. Investing in primary care is a "wise investment," but a "budget neutrality mind-set" could preclude policy-makers from investing in primary care services, he said.

Medical Home Recommendation

MedPAC also is recommending that Congress fund a medical home pilot project that would be more expansive than Medicare's current Medical Home Demonstration program, a three-year project that will fund demonstration projects in eight states and is scheduled to take effect in 2009.

The MedPAC recommendation, which defines the medical home as a "clinical setting that serves as a central resource for patient ongoing care," sets out stringent criteria for identifying medical homes. These practices must:
  • furnish primary care services, including coordination of appropriate preventive maintenance and acute health care services;
  • use health information technology for active clinical decision support;
  • offer care management services;
  • maintain 24-hour patient communication and rapid access services;
  • keep up-to-date records about patients' advance directives; and
  • have a formal quality improvement program.
MedPAC's proposed medical home pilot also would include a physician pay-for-performance component and thresholds for determining whether the pilot should be expanded into the full Medicare program or discontinued.

The commission estimates that the recommendation would cost $400 million during a three-year period; however, that $400 million figure does not take into account the expected cost savings, a calculation that should not be excluded, said commission member John Bertko.

"There is a measurable reduction in cost per person when more primary care office visits are the source of regular care," Bertko said. "I think there are cost savings here that have not been recognized."

Despite having voted for the recommendation, Dean admitted he still has some questions about it. "The ideal structure of the medical home is a little bit unclear in my mind," he said, adding that some rural practices may have trouble meeting all of the criteria for the medical home laid out in the recommendation, potentially disqualifying those small practices.

Share this on AAFP Connection

Government & Medicine

PCMH Is Answer to Medicare Payment Problems

Physician Groups Unite to Call for SGR Repeal

Threatened Medicare Payment Cuts Cause Chaos for FPs

AAFP, Medical Organizations Push for SGR Repeal

Focus of Conference Call is Shared Savings, Advance Payment

AAFP Renews Push for SGR Fix

FPs Can Expect Slight Changes in Medicare Pay for 2012

HHS Approach to Essential Health Benefits Falls Flat

CMS Delays Implementation of 'Sunshine Act'

Congress Works Out Temporary Solution to SGR Cut

Community-based Residencies Would Benefit From House Bill

GME Funding to Remain Level in 2012

House Rejects Measure to Block Medicare Pay Cut

House Addresses Medicare Payment Cut

AAFP Backs Tavenner as New CMS Administrator

Supercommittee Fails to Address SGR

Overcoming Scarce Resources to Enact Health Care Reform

Medicare Payment: Value Is as Important as Volume

AAFP President-elect Makes Return Visit to Capitol Hill

Insurance Exchanges, CO-OPs Might Provide Opportunity for FPs

AAFP Members Speak Out on Title VII Funding

Campaign Addresses Need for Medicare Payment Reform

AAFP Continues to Press Congress for Payment Solution

AAFP Leaders Take On Washington

Campaign Focuses on GME Outreach

'Family Medicine Matters,' AAFP Members Tell Congress

AAFP Outlines Suggested Changes for CO-OP Program

Groups Call on Supercommittee to Address Medical Liability Reform

Grassroots Efforts to Repeal SGR Continue

Bill Linking Mandatory Education to Prescribing Not Needed

Blended Payment Model Gives Boost to Primary Care Services

AAFP Joins AMA, Other Groups in Calling for SGR Repeal

Eliminating SGR May Come With High Price

Tobacco Oversight Must Include Cigars, Say AAFP, Other Groups

AAFP Rallies Congress of Delegates on Medicare Payment

AMA Task Force Focuses on Fixing the SGR

2012 Physician Fee Schedule Needs Work, Says AAFP

New Task Force Takes Steps to Better Value Primary Care

Deficit-reduction Plan Must Eliminate SGR, Says AAFP

Physicians File Lawsuit Over RUC, CMS Relationship

Policy Brief Explains HHS Insurance Exchange Plans

Deficit-reduction Plan Falls Short, Says AAFP President

YouTube Video Designed to Encourage SGR Repeal