American Academy of Family Physicians

Printer-friendly version

Share this on AAFP Connection

Share this page

Medicare Electronic Prescribing Penalty Program

AAFP, Other Physician Organizations Slam HHS, CMS for Policy Change

By News Staff

The AAFP has joined the AMA and more than four dozen national physician specialty organizations -- as well as medical associations from every state and the District of Columbia -- in urging HHS to put pressure on CMS to revise its electronic prescribing, or e-prescribing, penalty criteria, which are scheduled to be implemented Jan. 1.
According to those criteria, which only recently were published in the final 2011 Medicare physician fee schedule, beginning in 2012, CMS will penalize physicians who did not send Medicare prescriptions electronically in the first six months of 2011. However, up until now, the agency's message has been that physicians who were not e-prescribing by 2012 would face a 1 percent reduction in their Medicare allowed charges in 2012 and 2013.

The medical organizations clearly interpret the phrase "by 2012" differently than does the government agency.

"We strongly oppose basing the 2012 and 2013 e-prescribing penalties on e-prescribing activity that occurs during 2011," says the Dec. 7 letter to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.

A big issue is CMS' governance of more than one Medicare incentive program. Notably, CMS has ruled that physicians who choose to participate in the Medicare electronic health record, or EHR, incentive program cannot participate in Medicare's e-prescribing incentive program in the same program year.

Because of that restriction and the way the incentive programs are designed, physicians can participate in only one of the two programs in 2011, 2012 and 2013, says the letter. Therefore, many physicians have decided to forgo the e-prescribing incentive program in favor of the EHR incentive program.

"Now, at the eleventh hour … CMS has significantly changed its policy and decided to penalize physicians who choose to only take part in the Medicare EHR incentive program," says the letter. The parameters of that program don't necessarily require e-prescribing in 2011.

Furthermore, those same physicians who face penalties will implement comprehensive EHRs within the next few years that do much more "than just enable e-prescribing," the letter continues.

The organizations argue that CMS' "sudden change" in program requirements -- changes that take effect on Jan. 1 -- does not allow enough time to educate physicians on the need for them to take part in the 2011 e-prescribing incentive program to avoid e-prescribing penalties in 2012 and 2013.

Furthermore, says the letter, "such a significant last-minute policy change could substantially hurt the overall move to e-prescribing and EHR adoption."

"Financial penalties should only be levied in 2012 and 2013 against Medicare-eligible physicians who fail to qualify for an exemption and fail to e-prescribe 10 permissible prescriptions by the end of 2012 or the end of 2013," says the letter.

The letter also points out the law that established the Medicare e-prescribing program, the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (280-page PDF; About PDFs), clearly supports delaying penalties against physicians who do not e-prescribe in 2012.

The organizations say they "strongly oppose" basing the 2012 and 2013 e-prescribing penalties on e-prescribing activity that occurs during 2011. In the event CMS won't budge on the matter, the letter further asks CMS to immediately act to
  • extend the e-prescribing reporting period to 10 months -- from Jan. 1, 2011, to Oct. 31, 2011 -- rather than the six months currently proposed, and
  • add more exemptions from e-prescribing penalties in 2012 by allowing, for example, physicians who attest to meaningful use in 2011 or 2012 to be exempt from such penalties.
"These immediate steps will allow CMS and others more time to educate physicians on the e-prescribing penalty program and to come up with better solutions," says the letter.

Share this on AAFP Connection

Search AAFP News Now

 

Government & Medicine

Simplify Diabetes Supply Regulations, Says AAFP

FMCC Highlights Growing Influence of Primary Care

AAFP Seeking Information on Parity Program

Bipartisan Study Looks for How to Save Health Care

Academy Pushes for Payment Reform

AAFP Announces Support for Truth in Advertising Measure

U.S. Needs to Invest in Primary Care, Says AAFP Member

AAFP Answers Questions on Health IT Expansion

Repeal OTC Provision, Says AAFP

AAFP Responds to Proposal on SGR, Medicare Payment Fix

President's Budget Proposes Cuts in GME

AAFP Pushes for Tavenner Confirmation as CMS Head

ONC Launches Online Health IT Discussion Forum

State Medicaid Programs Drive PCMH Initiatives Forward

Sequestration Cuts Go Into Effect

Report Calls for Changes in Physician Payment Models

AAFP Outlines Funding Needed for FP Training Programs

Team-based Care Is in Patients' Best Interest, Says AAFP Director

Community-based Primary Care Training Is Focus of Legislation

Speakers Give Political Insight Into Health Care Reform

What Sequestration Cuts Mean for Family Physicians

AAFP Notes Concerns About Global Surgical Package Codes

House Republicans Draft Proposal to Repeal SGR

Sequestration Cuts to Take Effect April 1

AAFP Takes Payment Reform Message to Capitol Hill

CMS Releases Final Sunshine Act Rule

Sequestration Cuts Prompt Grass-roots Outreach

AAFP Responds to State of Union Address

Members Offer Opinions on Medical School Debt

States Need to Speedily Implement Parity Provision

Legislation Would Eliminate Broken Medicare Payment Formula

Senate Committee Recognizes Role of Primary Care Physicians

Nation Must Support Primary Care Infrastructure, Says AAFP

Family Medicine Can Play Role in Stemming Violence

Further Budget Cuts Likely in March

Analysts Tally 2011 U.S. Health Care Spending Growth

Despite Delays, FPs Can Expect Full Payment on Parity Provision

Budget Deal Averts Medicare Payment Cuts

AAFP Supports Key Provisions of Health Care Reform

Congresswoman Sees Primary Care as Future of Health Care

FPs Need to Think About Medicare Options

VA Proposal Would Incorporate More Non-VA Physicians

Physician Groups Present United Front on SGR Cuts

AAFP Sets Legislative Priorities for Family Medicine

Groups Speak Out Against Elimination of Payment Parity

AAFP Unites Members to Speak Out to Congress on Cuts

FP Community Takes Steps to Protect GME Funding

AAFP Outlines Strategies for Curtailing Prescription Drug Abuse

Proposed Rules Cover ACA Provisions

AAFP Joins Other Groups Seeking to Overturn Florida Law

AAFP Continues to Press Congress for Payment Solution

'Family Medicine Matters,' AAFP Members Tell Congress

Groups Call on Supercommittee to Address Medical Liability Reform

Grassroots Efforts to Repeal SGR Continue

AAFP Joins AMA, Other Groups in Calling for SGR Repeal

Eliminating SGR May Come With High Price

Tobacco Oversight Must Include Cigars, Say AAFP, Other Groups

AAFP Rallies Congress of Delegates on Medicare Payment

AMA Task Force Focuses on Fixing the SGR

2012 Physician Fee Schedule Needs Work, Says AAFP

New Task Force Takes Steps to Better Value Primary Care

Deficit-reduction Plan Must Eliminate SGR, Says AAFP

Policy Brief Explains HHS Insurance Exchange Plans

Deficit-reduction Plan Falls Short, Says AAFP President

YouTube Video Designed to Encourage SGR Repeal