This was successfully posted to your pofile.
This box will close automatically in a few seconds. Close this window
We don't have an e-mail address on file for you. To use AAFP Connection, you must have an e-mail address in our records. Click Here
CMS Postpones April 1 Implementation of Medicaid RAC Programs
AAFP, Others Urge Improvement in Proposed Rule
By News Staff
"Out of consideration for state operational issues and to ensure states comply with the provisions of the final rule, we have determined that states will not be required to implement their RAC programs by the proposed implementation date of April 1, 2011," says the CMS bulletin.
Instead, the final rule on the Medicaid RAC program will be issued later in 2011, along with a new implementation deadline for the states.
CMS' action comes on the heels of a Jan. 10 letter (11-page PDF; About PDFs) sent to CMS Administrator Donald Berwick, M.D. The letter, which was signed by the AAFP and more than two dozen other national physician organizations and medical organizations representing all 50 states and the District of Columbia, was initiated by the AMA.
"We continue to have concerns about the perverse incentive structure and burdensome nature of the Medicare Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program and firmly believe that the best way to reduce improper coding is through education and outreach," says the letter.
The organizations urge CMS to look at improvements made in the Medicare RAC program during the rule-making process and consider similar changes for the Medicaid RAC program.
"We ask CMS to be mindful of the multitude of new challenges facing physicians as a result of health system reform, in addition to the implementation of health information technology and the transition to ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS codes," say the organizations.
The letter urges CMS to issue Medicaid RAC program requirements "that are consistent with the Medicare RAC program requirements, thereby empowering states to avoid problems already encountered and addressed in the Medicare RAC program."
Specifically, the organizations ask CMS to
- limit the "look-back period" to no more than three years and preclude Medicaid RACs from reviewing claims from the past 12 months;
- impose the medical record limit established for the Medicare RAC record requests, and preferably, limit requests to no more than three medical records within a 45-day period;
- issue a requirement that physician medical directors be present on Medicaid RAC staffs;
- require Medicaid RACs to document good cause for claims review;
- insist on the establishment of RAC websites and the posting of timely information;
- press for the return of payment upon successful provider appeal at any level in the appeals process; and
- order the use of certified coders to make coding determinations.
The letter also addresses "underpayment" in the RAC program and notes that, in the proposed rule, CMS confirms that its "experience with Medicare RAC contractors is that overpayment recoveries exceed underpayment identification by more than a nine-to-one ratio." The medical organizations strongly urge CMS to set forth Medicaid RAC underpayment fee structure requirements.
In closing, the organizations stress that they "support CMS' efforts to identify improper or fraudulent activity but caution that physicians have been unjustly and negatively affected by untested and uninformed program implementation."
In December, the AAFP drafted its own letter to Berwick (4-page PDF; About PDFs) detailing similar AAFP comments on the Medcaid RAC program proposed rule that was published in the Nov. 10 issue of the Federal Register (9-page PDF; About PDFs).
Recovery Audit Contractors