American Academy of Family Physicians

Printer-friendly version

Share this on AAFP Connection

Share this page

AAFP to CMS: 2012 Physician Fee Schedule Needs Work

By News Staff

How would the AAFP improve CMS' proposed 2012 Medicare physician fee schedule (176-page PDF; About PDFs)? It took AAFP Board Chair Lori Heim, M.D., of Vass, N.C., 26 pages to detail all of the Academy's recommendations.
In her Aug. 29 letter (26-page PDF; About PDFs) to CMS Administrator Donald Berwick, M.D., Heim urged CMS to make multiple revisions to the schedule -- from how the agency measures the value of primary care to its plan to include a mandatory health risk assessment in Medicare's annual wellness visit.

Fairly Value Primary Care Services

Heim hit the issue of potentially misvalued services early and hard. She pointed out the well-documented and widening income gap between cognitive and procedural physician specialties, and the resulting downstream effect that is dramatically reshaping the physician workforce.

"Effectively revaluing primary care and other cognitive codes will be essential to ensuring that there are a sufficient number of primary care physicians in the future," said Heim.

"The critical shortage of primary care physicians, who best manage the complexities of chronic care, results from the current flawed payment structure," said Heim. She urged CMS to improve the existing payment disparity by
  • paying for services that currently are not covered, such as telephone calls and online medical evaluations;
  • revisiting and adopting the median relative value units for outpatient evaluation and management codes that were originally submitted to the AMA/Specialty Society Relative Value Scale Update Committee, or the RUC, in 2007 (those values were substantially reduced by the RUC prior to adoption); and
  • reimbursing certain "G" codes that relate to care provided in practices that offer patients a "certified" patient-centered medical home.

Story highlights

  • In feedback on CMS' proposed 2012 Medicare physician fee schedule, AAFP Board Chair Lori Heim, M.D., focused attention on the need for CMS to more fairly appraise the value of the services primary care physicians provide to patients.
  • Heim objected to CMS' proposal to require a health risk assessment as part of the annual wellness visit in 2012.
  • The AAFP urged CMS to ensure proper metrics have been identified and vetted before launching the next phase of its physician performance reporting program.
Heim pointed out that tools that didn't exist 20 years ago are available today to assess work intensity, practice expense and the cost of training, and she urged CMS to "establish a more rapid review of misvalued services."

Given the usual RUC process, potentially misvalued services remain that way for a full two years after they are identified, said Heim. "If CMS and the RUC are unable to develop a more timely process, then CMS should proceed to identify and adjust misvalued codes independently of the RUC."
The Academy asked CMS to continue its involvement as an observer to the Academy's newly created Primary Care Valuation Task Force, which is charged with finding ways to more fairly appraise the value of evaluation and management services. That task force of health care policy experts held its initial meeting on Aug. 22 in Washington.

Postpone Health Risk Assessment Requirement

The Academy also objected to CMS' proposal to require a health risk assessment, or HRA, as part of Medicare beneficiaries' annual wellness visits, or AWV, in 2012.

Heim made it clear that although the AAFP supports the concept of the HRA as an evaluation tool that helps gather accurate information about a patient's health status, injury risks, modifiable risk factors and urgent health needs, CMS has yet to provide guidance to FPs on how to do this.

The HRA model, which was mandated by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, has yet to be formulated. Development and availability to the public of an HRA model was supposed to be completed no later than 18 months after the Affordable Care Act was passed, but HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has yet to meet this requirement.

Heim pushed the point: "While we understand CMS' desire to comply with the inclusion of the HRA into the AWV, it is unfair to hold physicians accountable for this portion of the Affordable Care Act when the Secretary has not yet fulfilled the crucial step of providing an HRA model.

"How can physicians successfully implement an HRA in January of 2012 when no model and no guidance are available?"

Furthermore, said Heim, the majority of HRAs in the current Medicare population will be handled by phone or during the patient's AWV and "will add a significant burden of time and expense for the practice."

CMS also underestimated the complexity of the documentation needed for each HRA completed, said Heim. The AAFP expanded the two-page form used to capture the elements of Medicare's initial preventive physical exam into a six-page form just to capture the additional elements of the AWV. The inclusion of an HRA "will reach another level of complexity," said Heim.

Improve Physician Quality Reporting System

Heim also ticked off a number of necessary improvements to the agency's Physician Quality Reporting System, or PQRS, a program aimed at delivering payment incentives to physicians who successfully report data on quality measures during a specific reporting period.

Heim suggested that CMS
  • continue to offer as many PQRS reporting options and timeframes as possible to facilitate successful participation by small to medium-sized groups,
  • allow physicians to form "virtual" groups for PQRS reporting proposes,
  • accelerate the requirement definition and the review process for qualifying PQRS registries,
  • hold vendors accountable for successful data submission, and
  • minimize administrative burdens if physicians are required to report on PQRS core measures that focus on cardiovascular conditions and only use measures endorsed by the National Quality Forum.
The Academy also urged CMS to refrain from basing the 2015 PQRS penalty on 2013 performance, and provide physicians with more timely access to PQRS feedback reports.

"The current 18-24 month lag time between the point of care and access to a feedback report is fundamentally not helpful from a quality improvement perspective," said Heim. "If the PQRS program is truly intended to improve the quality of physician services, the AAFP believes CMS must begin offering timelier (monthly or quarterly) interim feedback reports to PQRS participants."

Ensure Readiness Before Moving Ahead

Additionally, the Academy noted that, in some instances, CMS must not move ahead with a program before the necessary infrastructure is in place. For example, Heim urged CMS to refrain from prematurely posting information on physician performance on its "Physician Compare" website -- as required by the Affordable Care Act -- before standardized metrics for assessment of safety, effectiveness and timeliness of care and assessment of continuity and coordination of care are created.

"The AAFP reminds CMS that the Affordable Care Act stipulates that public reporting should only occur to the extent that scientifically sound measures are developed and available," said Heim. "The AAFP urges CMS to be aware of the possibility of penalizing physicians who see patients who are less willing or able to adhere to recommended care," she added.

Heim also advised CMS to avoid rushing the implementation of the next phase of improvements to the physician feedback program and the establishment of a new value-based payment modifier scheduled for implementation in 2015.

According to the law, CMS is to establish quality measures for the value-based modifier by 2012.

"CMS should not rush implementation of the value-based payment modifier and hastily adjust physicians' Medicare payments" before CMS' payment policies are clear, said Heim. "CMS must publicly develop further specifications surrounding this program while significantly improving the agency's capability of processing Medicare claims and performance data in a more meaningful and real-time manner," she added.


Share this on AAFP Connection

Search AAFP News Now

 

Government & Medicine

FMCC Highlights Growing Influence of Primary Care

AAFP Seeking Information on Parity Program

Bipartisan Study Looks for How to Save Health Care

Academy Pushes for Payment Reform

AAFP Announces Support for Truth in Advertising Measure

U.S. Needs to Invest in Primary Care, Says AAFP Member

AAFP Answers Questions on Health IT Expansion

Repeal OTC Provision, Says AAFP

AAFP Responds to Proposal on SGR, Medicare Payment Fix

President's Budget Proposes Cuts in GME

AAFP Pushes for Tavenner Confirmation as CMS Head

ONC Launches Online Health IT Discussion Forum

State Medicaid Programs Drive PCMH Initiatives Forward

Sequestration Cuts Go Into Effect

Report Calls for Changes in Physician Payment Models

AAFP Outlines Funding Needed for FP Training Programs

Team-based Care Is in Patients' Best Interest, Says AAFP Director

Community-based Primary Care Training Is Focus of Legislation

Speakers Give Political Insight Into Health Care Reform

What Sequestration Cuts Mean for Family Physicians

AAFP Notes Concerns About Global Surgical Package Codes

House Republicans Draft Proposal to Repeal SGR

Sequestration Cuts to Take Effect April 1

AAFP Takes Payment Reform Message to Capitol Hill

CMS Releases Final Sunshine Act Rule

Sequestration Cuts Prompt Grass-roots Outreach

AAFP Responds to State of Union Address

Members Offer Opinions on Medical School Debt

States Need to Speedily Implement Parity Provision

Legislation Would Eliminate Broken Medicare Payment Formula

Senate Committee Recognizes Role of Primary Care Physicians

Nation Must Support Primary Care Infrastructure, Says AAFP

Family Medicine Can Play Role in Stemming Violence

Further Budget Cuts Likely in March

Analysts Tally 2011 U.S. Health Care Spending Growth

Despite Delays, FPs Can Expect Full Payment on Parity Provision

Budget Deal Averts Medicare Payment Cuts

AAFP Supports Key Provisions of Health Care Reform

Congresswoman Sees Primary Care as Future of Health Care

FPs Need to Think About Medicare Options

VA Proposal Would Incorporate More Non-VA Physicians

Physician Groups Present United Front on SGR Cuts

AAFP Sets Legislative Priorities for Family Medicine

Groups Speak Out Against Elimination of Payment Parity

AAFP Unites Members to Speak Out to Congress on Cuts

FP Community Takes Steps to Protect GME Funding

AAFP Outlines Strategies for Curtailing Prescription Drug Abuse

Proposed Rules Cover ACA Provisions

AAFP Joins Other Groups Seeking to Overturn Florida Law

AAFP Continues to Press Congress for Payment Solution

'Family Medicine Matters,' AAFP Members Tell Congress

Groups Call on Supercommittee to Address Medical Liability Reform

Grassroots Efforts to Repeal SGR Continue

AAFP Joins AMA, Other Groups in Calling for SGR Repeal

Eliminating SGR May Come With High Price

Tobacco Oversight Must Include Cigars, Say AAFP, Other Groups

AAFP Rallies Congress of Delegates on Medicare Payment

AMA Task Force Focuses on Fixing the SGR

2012 Physician Fee Schedule Needs Work, Says AAFP

New Task Force Takes Steps to Better Value Primary Care

Deficit-reduction Plan Must Eliminate SGR, Says AAFP

Policy Brief Explains HHS Insurance Exchange Plans

Deficit-reduction Plan Falls Short, Says AAFP President

YouTube Video Designed to Encourage SGR Repeal