This was successfully posted to your pofile.
This box will close automatically in a few seconds. Close this window
We don't have an e-mail address on file for you. To use AAFP Connection, you must have an e-mail address in our records. Click Here
Medicare Payment: Value Is as Important as Volume
Testimony to Senate HELP Committee Focuses on Flaws in Fee-for-Service System
By News Staff
"Whether this includes a multiyear extension of the current payment formula with a higher conversion factor for primary care, or a permanent fix to the fee-for-service system that includes (a) higher payment rate for primary care services, our recommendation is that the current flawed approach does not serve Medicare patients well and must be changed to reflect the value of primary care and family physicians," said Stream in a written statement for a HELP Committee hearing on the role of health care delivery system reform in lowering costs and improving quality.
- AAFP President Glen Stream, M.D., M.B.I., recently sent a written statement on the current Medicare payment system for inclusion in a hearing called by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee
- Stream called for a repeal of the sustainable growth rate formula because it consistently undervalues primary care physicians, who have the potential to provide a health care system based on high-quality, cost-effective and coordinated care.
- Steam also assailed the current fee-for-service payment system, saying it pays for medical care based on the number of services provided rather than the value of health care services provided.
"Every day, family physicians and other primary care doctors see the results of our poorly functioning system of care. Duplicative and unnecessary tests are ordered. Diseases remain undiagnosed and untreated until they result in acute conditions. Patients with multiple chronic illnesses are shunted from one (sub)specialist to another -- each one of whom treats only one of the diseases.
"Increasing the role of primary care physicians in delivering health care would result in "high-quality, coordinated, cost-effective care to patients," said Stream.
The current payment system for Medicare hinders primary care physicians because it tries to control "the volume of health services at the individual physician level by imposing payment penalties globally across all physician payments," said Stream.
Typically, a payment model such as the SGR model, which calls for lower payment rates when the volume of services exceeds established targets, would result in physicians reducing the number of services they provide. Instead, the SGR has created an incentive for procedure-based physicians to boost the number of services provided to ensure stable or increased payments.
AAFP, Other Medical Groups Urge SGR Repeal in Letter to Joint Select Committee
"The uncertainly and instability that the annual threat of SGR-induced payment cuts cause for physician practices cannot be overstated," says the letter, which was signed by 117 medical specialty organizations and state medical societies. "Congress has stepped in 12 times over the past decade to stop pending cuts.
"With cuts of this magnitude pending, Congress should not wait until the 11th hour to take action," says the letter. "The Select Committee is the proper venue for the hard choices and honest budgeting needed to repeal the SGR and eliminate the shortfall in Medicare funding that grows worse each time Congress takes short-term actions to stop imminent cuts."
The letter also notes that repeal of the SGR is necessary to enable the transition to payment and care delivery innovations that promote "high-quality, well-coordinated, cost-effective care."
Basing the payment system on the number of services provided rather than the value of services provided doesn't work, said Stream. The system doesn't value the comprehensive care provided by family physicians and other primary care physicians, including individual and population care management, behavioral health, behavior change coaching, facilitating social services, and making appropriate referrals.
"The unintended consequences of the (SGR) payment formula are why the AAFP and all major physician organizations long have recommended that Congress repeal the SGR," said Stream.
In his statement, Stream advocated the patient-centered medical home, or PCMH, model as an effective alternative to the current Medicare payment system. The PCMH is "a health delivery model based on blended payments to a primary care team, led by a physician, that includes fee-for-service and a monthly per-patient fee to cover the coordination of health care that focuses on preventing illness and managing chronic diseases like diabetes or asthma," said Stream. The model also recognizes quality improvement.
"The evidence for the value of primary care in restraining health care costs and improving quality is very clear when that care is delivered in a team-based, patient-centered medical home," said Stream.
Regardless of what kind of alternative Medicare payment system is put into place, Stream noted, "the AAFP believes that it will succeed only if it is built on providing health care that is patient-centered and incorporates an advanced primary care practice that is team-based and technologically capable."