This was successfully posted to your pofile.
This box will close automatically in a few seconds. Close this window
We don't have an e-mail address on file for you. To use AAFP Connection, you must have an e-mail address in our records. Click Here
Physician Overpayment Proposal Needs Work, Says AAFP
CMS Final Rule Should Reflect True Nature of Overpayments
By News Staff
CMS issued the proposed rule (9-page PDF; About PDFs) earlier this year, prompting immediate concerns from the AAFP that the proposal "confuses the occasional overpayments made by a CMS contractor with malicious or fraudulent activities on the part of Medicare providers and suppliers."
"While an overpayment can be indicative of fraud and abuse, most overpayments are caused by inadvertent errors and should be treated as such," says AAFP Board Chair Roland Goertz, M.D., M.B.A., of Waco, Texas, in an April 11 letter (4-page PDF; About PDFs) to CMS Acting Administrator Marilyn Tavenner, M.A.
Goertz points out that the Affordable Care Act requires the 60-day period to begin with identification of the overpayment, but CMS does not clearly specify whether actual knowledge of an overpayment occurs when a physician learns of a case that caused the overpayment or when the overpayment is determined and calculated.
- The AAFP is urging CMS to make changes to a proposed rule on reporting and returning physician overpayments.
- The final rule should reflect the true nature of overpayments, the AAFP says in a letter to CMS Acting Administrator Marilyn Tavenner, M.A.
- The AAFP also notes that it "adamantly opposes" CMS' proposal to use a 10-year look-back period for overpayment, which would require physicians to maintain billing records for 10 years.
CMS should further consider the rule's financial impact on medical practices, says Goertz, and he calls on the agency to start the 60-day time frame after an audit has determined an overpayment has been made and identified the amount to be returned. This would give physicians, other providers and suppliers time to complete the audit before the repayment period begins, according to Goertz.
In addition, the AAFP "adamantly opposes" CMS' proposal to use a 10-year look-back period for overpayment -- particularly as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 only requires physicians to maintain billing records for six years, says Goertz.
"If (the records) are available, they may be archived and may not be readily retrievable," Goertz says. "Further, changes in the regulatory requirements over the past 10 years would also have to be reverse-engineered by physicians to determine whether an overpayment was, in fact, made. … The AAFP strongly urges CMS to enforce a three-year look-back period as it is a more compatible and considerate time frame for medical practices."
Goertz also points out that the proposed rule requests comments on assumptions made by CMS about the burden of the rule on physicians. "CMS estimates it will take a physician 2.5 hours to both complete a typical overpayment reporting form -- at an estimated cost of $37.10 per hour -- and return the overpayment," Goertz says. "The AAFP finds it alarming that CMS seems comfortable subjecting physicians to these time frames and costs."
The AAFP strongly urges CMS to streamline the reporting form and reduce the cost of reporting. "If the overpayment is less than $100, medical practices will likely expend as much or more to report and return the overpayment, for which they may not even be at fault," Goertz says. "Therefore, the AAFP urges CMS to consider establishing a minimum overpayment threshold in the spirit of simplifying inadvertent and innocent errors."