American Academy of Family Physicians

Printer-friendly version

Share this on AAFP Connection

Share this page

Proposed Medicaid Parity Payments Should Apply Only to Primary Care, Says AAFP

Including Subspecialists in Program Not Intent of Law, Says Board Chair

By News Staff

The AAFP is expressing both support and concern about a proposed CMS regulation (21-page PDF; About PDFs) that would implement a provision from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to increase Medicaid payment rates to Medicare levels for primary care physicians during the next two years.
AAFP Advocacy - Capitol Building
In a letter (5-page PDF; About PDFs) to CMS, AAFP Board Chair Roland Goertz, M.D., M.B.A., of Waco, Texas, reiterates the Academy's overall support for the parity provision, saying "the AAFP was pleased that the Affordable Care Act recognized the growing crisis in Medicaid beneficiaries' access to needed primary care services and the importance of supporting primary care payments as a step toward encouraging more medical students to choose primary care specialties."

In the proposed rule, CMS says it is interested in ensuring primary care physicians receive the benefit of the increased payment, a goal shared by the AAFP, Goertz says. However, he notes, the AAFP disagrees with a part of the proposed rule that would allow subspecialists to also qualify for the increased Medicaid payment. Inclusion of subspecialists is not the intent of the law, adds Goertz, and including them would perpetuate existing disparities in physician payment rates.
Goertz points out that states will receive $11 billion in new funds in 2013-14 to increase their Medicaid payments to Medicare levels. But this funding boost is only temporary, prompting concerns from the AAFP that allowing subspecialists to qualify for the bonus will add extra costs to the program.

Story Highlights

  • In a letter to CMS, the AAFP expresses both support and concern about a proposed CMS regulation that would implement a Medicaid parity provision outlined in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
  • The AAFP supports the overall intent of the parity law itself and certain provisions of the proposed regulation.
  • However, the Academy disagrees with a part of the proposed regulation that would allow subspecialists to also qualify for the increased Medicaid payment.
The AAFP is urging CMS to restrict qualification for the program to physicians with a primary specialty designation of
  • family medicine,
  • general internal medicine or
  • pediatric medicine.
Congress did not intend for subspecialists to receive payment as primary care physicians, says Goertz, referring back to the original language in the Affordable Care Act.

"The AAFP recognizes that physician specialty alone does not necessarily define a primary care physician (because) many internal medicine and family physicians work as hospitalists or in emergency rooms. Many subspecialists also use their primary training designation in filing claims with CMS rather than their subspecialty training designation," says Goertz.

He adds that CMS should identify primary care physicians for the enhanced payment by looking for the definitional elements of primary care, which include first contact, continuity and comprehensiveness of care. However, if this should prove too difficult, Goertz suggests that CMS limit qualification for the payments to
  • physicians with a primary specialty designation of family medicine, general internal medicine or pediatric medicine who are board-certified in these areas or
  • who, if not board-certified, have at least 60 percent of their overall claims in primary care services.
In the letter, Goertz also points out that the proposed regulation calls for an update to the interim regional maximum fees physicians and other health care professionals can charge for administration of pediatric vaccines to children eligible to receive them through the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program.

CMS proposes to use the Medicare economic index to update the maximum administration fee based on the 1994 VFC value, notes Goertz. The regulation asks that states be required to compensate VFC providers at the lesser of the 2013-14 Medicare rates or the maximum regional VFC amount in those years.

"The AAFP supports this as a step in the right direction of supporting primary care physicians in their provision of this valuable public health service," Goertz says.


Share this on AAFP Connection

Search AAFP News Now

 

Government & Medicine

Simplify Diabetes Supply Regulations, Says AAFP

FMCC Highlights Growing Influence of Primary Care

AAFP Seeking Information on Parity Program

Bipartisan Study Looks for How to Save Health Care

Academy Pushes for Payment Reform

AAFP Announces Support for Truth in Advertising Measure

U.S. Needs to Invest in Primary Care, Says AAFP Member

AAFP Answers Questions on Health IT Expansion

Repeal OTC Provision, Says AAFP

AAFP Responds to Proposal on SGR, Medicare Payment Fix

President's Budget Proposes Cuts in GME

AAFP Pushes for Tavenner Confirmation as CMS Head

ONC Launches Online Health IT Discussion Forum

State Medicaid Programs Drive PCMH Initiatives Forward

Sequestration Cuts Go Into Effect

Report Calls for Changes in Physician Payment Models

AAFP Outlines Funding Needed for FP Training Programs

Team-based Care Is in Patients' Best Interest, Says AAFP Director

Community-based Primary Care Training Is Focus of Legislation

Speakers Give Political Insight Into Health Care Reform

What Sequestration Cuts Mean for Family Physicians

AAFP Notes Concerns About Global Surgical Package Codes

House Republicans Draft Proposal to Repeal SGR

Sequestration Cuts to Take Effect April 1

AAFP Takes Payment Reform Message to Capitol Hill

CMS Releases Final Sunshine Act Rule

Sequestration Cuts Prompt Grass-roots Outreach

AAFP Responds to State of Union Address

Members Offer Opinions on Medical School Debt

States Need to Speedily Implement Parity Provision

Legislation Would Eliminate Broken Medicare Payment Formula

Senate Committee Recognizes Role of Primary Care Physicians

Nation Must Support Primary Care Infrastructure, Says AAFP

Family Medicine Can Play Role in Stemming Violence

Further Budget Cuts Likely in March

Analysts Tally 2011 U.S. Health Care Spending Growth

Despite Delays, FPs Can Expect Full Payment on Parity Provision

Budget Deal Averts Medicare Payment Cuts

AAFP Supports Key Provisions of Health Care Reform

Congresswoman Sees Primary Care as Future of Health Care

FPs Need to Think About Medicare Options

VA Proposal Would Incorporate More Non-VA Physicians

Physician Groups Present United Front on SGR Cuts

AAFP Sets Legislative Priorities for Family Medicine

Groups Speak Out Against Elimination of Payment Parity

AAFP Unites Members to Speak Out to Congress on Cuts

FP Community Takes Steps to Protect GME Funding

AAFP Outlines Strategies for Curtailing Prescription Drug Abuse

Proposed Rules Cover ACA Provisions

AAFP Joins Other Groups Seeking to Overturn Florida Law

AAFP Continues to Press Congress for Payment Solution

'Family Medicine Matters,' AAFP Members Tell Congress

Groups Call on Supercommittee to Address Medical Liability Reform

Grassroots Efforts to Repeal SGR Continue

AAFP Joins AMA, Other Groups in Calling for SGR Repeal

Eliminating SGR May Come With High Price

Tobacco Oversight Must Include Cigars, Say AAFP, Other Groups

AAFP Rallies Congress of Delegates on Medicare Payment

AMA Task Force Focuses on Fixing the SGR

2012 Physician Fee Schedule Needs Work, Says AAFP

New Task Force Takes Steps to Better Value Primary Care

Deficit-reduction Plan Must Eliminate SGR, Says AAFP

Policy Brief Explains HHS Insurance Exchange Plans

Deficit-reduction Plan Falls Short, Says AAFP President

YouTube Video Designed to Encourage SGR Repeal