American Academy of Family Physicians

Printer-friendly version

Share this on AAFP Connection

Share this page

Key Components of 2013 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Highlighted in AAFP Summary

By News Staff

The final 2013 Medicare physician fee schedule rule has more than 1,300 pages, and some of the information contained in the rule is vital for AAFP members. To help busy family physicians, the AAFP has put together a summary (16-page PDF; About PDFs) that explains how various components of the 2013 fee schedule are likely to affect primary care and family medicine.
Stock photo-hands with fee schedule and calculator
The summary addresses a variety of issues in the CMS final 2013 Medicare physician fee schedule, including the conversion factor for 2013, changes in relative value units, misvalued codes, geographic practice cost indices, telehealth services, primary care and care coordination, new preventive service G-codes, durable medical equipment (DME), and several CMS initiatives.

According to the summary, the 2012 physician fee schedule conversion factor is $34.04. Any payment increases in the fee schedule, however, will occur only if Congress blocks a 26.5 percent payment reduction scheduled to take effect on Jan. 1 as a result of the sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula. If Congress does not take action, the 2013 conversion factor will be $25, according to the summary.

"The 2013 (fee) schedule once again focuses a bright light on the dysfunctional sustainable growth rate formula on which Medicare payment is based," says the AAFP summary. "It re-emphasizes the imperative that Congress needs to permanently change the basis for calculating Medicare physician payment."

Story Highlights

  • The AAFP has put together a summary of the 2013 Medicare physician schedule highlighting how various components of the fee schedule will impact primary care and family medicine.
  • In the summary, the AAFP points out that any proposed increases will be affected by the sustainable growth rate unless Congress blocks a scheduled pay cut.
  • The fee schedule also identifies six additional preventive services that Medicare will now cover for their beneficiaries.
The summary also provides background on various components of the 2013 fee schedule, provides the AAFP's position on that particular part of the fee schedule and then discusses content in the proposed and final CMS regulations. In addressing primary care and care coordination, for example, the summary notes that the AAFP supports CMS's proposal to create a post-discharge, transitional care management (TCM) code as a short-term strategy, but the AAFP urges CMS to restrict use of the (payment) code to the patient's primary care physician. The TCM code is designed to pay physicians for coordinating patient care for the 30 days immediately following a hospital or nursing facility stay.

The AAFP summary also addresses payment for additional preventive services. For example, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) gives CMS the authority to add coverage of additional preventive services. As a result, CMS now pays for six additional preventive services:
  • annual alcohol misuse screening,
  • face-to-face behavioral counseling for alcohol misuse,
  • annual depression screening,
  • behavioral counseling to prevent sexually transmitted infections,
  • annual face-to-face intensive behavior therapy for cardiovascular disease and
  • face-to-face behavioral counseling for obesity.
Although the AAFP agrees with covering additional preventive services, the Academy questioned some of the payment amounts. CMS also added similar preventive service codes for Medicare telehealth services, according to the summary.

CMS also made some changes regarding DME. The ACA requires physicians to conduct a face-to-face encounter with patients before they certify eligibility for home health services or DME. In the final regulation, CMS proposes that physicians communicate to the DME supplier -- and document that communication -- that the physician, a physician assistant, a nurse practitioner or a clinical nurse specialist had a face-to-face encounter with the beneficiary within a six-month period before the order was written. According to CMS, it is "critical that the face-to-face (encounter) be counted before the item is delivered to the beneficiary's home."

CMS also sought to reduce documentation requirements for DME by allowing the submission of the related portion of the medical record by the physician to suffice to document the face-to-face encounter.

"Documentation of the face-to-face encounter must include an evaluation of the beneficiary, needs assessment for the beneficiary, or treatment of the beneficiary for the medical condition that supports the need for each covered item of DME. A written order is still required for these covered items of DME," says the AAFP summary.

Other notable items in the 2013 Medicare physician fee schedule are:
  • CMS will begin gradually phasing in the value-based payment modifier initiative, and will use 2013 data to determine payments for 2015. The value-based modifier will initially apply to groups of physicians with 100 or more eligible professionals. CMS initially proposed applying the modifier to groups of 25 or more providers.
  • CMS basically left the Physician Quality Reporting System intact, although the final rule contains several efforts by the agency to "better align quality reporting requirements across programs to reduce burden and complexity," according to the AAFP summary.
  • CMS finalized two additional exemptions for participating in the electronic prescribing incentive program. The two additional exemptions include eligible professionals or group practices that achieve meaningful use during certain prescription adjustment reporting periods and eligible professionals or group practices that demonstrate intent to participate in the electronic health records incentive (EHR) program and adoption of EHR technology.

Share this on AAFP Connection

Search AAFP News Now

 

Government & Medicine

Simplify Diabetes Supply Regulations, Says AAFP

FMCC Highlights Growing Influence of Primary Care

AAFP Seeking Information on Parity Program

Bipartisan Study Looks for How to Save Health Care

Academy Pushes for Payment Reform

AAFP Announces Support for Truth in Advertising Measure

U.S. Needs to Invest in Primary Care, Says AAFP Member

AAFP Answers Questions on Health IT Expansion

Repeal OTC Provision, Says AAFP

AAFP Responds to Proposal on SGR, Medicare Payment Fix

President's Budget Proposes Cuts in GME

AAFP Pushes for Tavenner Confirmation as CMS Head

ONC Launches Online Health IT Discussion Forum

State Medicaid Programs Drive PCMH Initiatives Forward

Sequestration Cuts Go Into Effect

Report Calls for Changes in Physician Payment Models

AAFP Outlines Funding Needed for FP Training Programs

Team-based Care Is in Patients' Best Interest, Says AAFP Director

Community-based Primary Care Training Is Focus of Legislation

Speakers Give Political Insight Into Health Care Reform

What Sequestration Cuts Mean for Family Physicians

AAFP Notes Concerns About Global Surgical Package Codes

House Republicans Draft Proposal to Repeal SGR

Sequestration Cuts to Take Effect April 1

AAFP Takes Payment Reform Message to Capitol Hill

CMS Releases Final Sunshine Act Rule

Sequestration Cuts Prompt Grass-roots Outreach

AAFP Responds to State of Union Address

Members Offer Opinions on Medical School Debt

States Need to Speedily Implement Parity Provision

Legislation Would Eliminate Broken Medicare Payment Formula

Senate Committee Recognizes Role of Primary Care Physicians

Nation Must Support Primary Care Infrastructure, Says AAFP

Family Medicine Can Play Role in Stemming Violence

Further Budget Cuts Likely in March

Analysts Tally 2011 U.S. Health Care Spending Growth

Despite Delays, FPs Can Expect Full Payment on Parity Provision

Budget Deal Averts Medicare Payment Cuts

AAFP Supports Key Provisions of Health Care Reform

Congresswoman Sees Primary Care as Future of Health Care

FPs Need to Think About Medicare Options

VA Proposal Would Incorporate More Non-VA Physicians

Physician Groups Present United Front on SGR Cuts

AAFP Sets Legislative Priorities for Family Medicine

Groups Speak Out Against Elimination of Payment Parity

AAFP Unites Members to Speak Out to Congress on Cuts

FP Community Takes Steps to Protect GME Funding

AAFP Outlines Strategies for Curtailing Prescription Drug Abuse

Proposed Rules Cover ACA Provisions

AAFP Joins Other Groups Seeking to Overturn Florida Law

AAFP Continues to Press Congress for Payment Solution

'Family Medicine Matters,' AAFP Members Tell Congress

Groups Call on Supercommittee to Address Medical Liability Reform

Grassroots Efforts to Repeal SGR Continue

AAFP Joins AMA, Other Groups in Calling for SGR Repeal

Eliminating SGR May Come With High Price

Tobacco Oversight Must Include Cigars, Say AAFP, Other Groups

AAFP Rallies Congress of Delegates on Medicare Payment

AMA Task Force Focuses on Fixing the SGR

2012 Physician Fee Schedule Needs Work, Says AAFP

New Task Force Takes Steps to Better Value Primary Care

Deficit-reduction Plan Must Eliminate SGR, Says AAFP

Policy Brief Explains HHS Insurance Exchange Plans

Deficit-reduction Plan Falls Short, Says AAFP President

YouTube Video Designed to Encourage SGR Repeal