American Academy of Family Physicians

Printer-friendly version

Share this on AAFP Connection

Share this page

Despite Lagging Implementation of Parity Provision, Physicians Will See Full Medicaid Payment Boost

By James Arvantes

Although many family physicians who see Medicaid patients are due for an increase in payment as of Jan. 1, they may not see those increased payments for a while. That's because most state Medicaid programs are not ready to implement the Medicaid/Medicare parity provision in the health care reform law that brings Medicaid rates for primary care services at least up to Medicare levels for the next two years.
Doctor checking boy's ear
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act requires states to submit a state plan amendment outlining how they will implement the parity provision -- whether they will make increased payments on a monthly or quarterly basis, for example. States have until March 31 to submit their plan amendments, and CMS then has 90 days to approve, disapprove or ask for more information about the plans. States are responsible for paying physicians retroactively to Jan. 1, however.

AAFP President Jeff Cain, M.D., of Denver, said the enhanced Medicaid rates (4-page PDF; About PDFs) will increase access to Medicaid services, resulting in higher quality and better controlled costs. "This is one part of the Affordable Care Act that helps primary care practices, improves payment rates and increases access to health care for the underserved," said Cain. "These are priorities for the AAFP."

story highlights

  • Most state Medicaid programs are not ready to implement a provision to bring Medicaid payment levels for primary care services up to Medicare levels for the next two years.
  • The provision officially went into effect on Jan. 1, and states are responsible for retroactively paying qualifying physicians and other eligible health care professionals from that date forward.
  • State Medicaid programs have until March 31 to submit a state plan amendment stating how they will implement the parity provision.
CMS, meanwhile, has issued two new question-and-answer documents to help physicians and other stakeholders better understand the parity provision. One of the documents (7-page PDF; About PDFs) addresses implementation of the parity provision in the fee-for-service environment, and the other (2-page PDF) focuses on implementation within Medicaid managed care. By presenting the information in a question-and-answer format, CMS is addressing many of the questions the agency has received since publishing the final rule (33-page PDF) on the parity provision in early November.

The document that addresses the provision of primary care services within Medicaid fee-for-service explains who qualifies for the enhanced payments and what eligible physicians and other health care professionals need to do to obtain the enhanced payments.

"The statute specifies that higher payment applies to primary care services delivered by a physician with a specialty designation of family medicine, general internal medicine or pediatric medicine," the document states. "The regulation specifies that specialists and subspecialists within those designations as recognized by the American Board of Medical Specialties, the American Osteopathic Association or the American Board of Physician Specialties also qualify for the enhanced payment."

According to the document, physicians are required to qualify for the increased payments by self-attesting that they are board-certified in family medicine, internal medicine or pediatrics, or they have to show that at least 60 percent of their billing for evaluation and management (E/M) codes is for primary care services.

The document poses and answers other questions as well. For example, it covers the 60 percent threshold for qualifying for the enhanced payment and whether that includes E/M codes and vaccine administration codes.

"The 60 percent threshold can be met by any combination of eligible E/M codes and vaccine administration codes," according to the document.

Another question in the managed care document asks whether managed care plans under contract with a state can use their own definitions of primary care health professionals and services for the purposes of complying with the rule.

"While we recognize that health plans may have unique definitions of primary care providers and services, the availability of the increased (payment) is limited to the scope of eligible primary care providers and primary care services as defined in (the) statute and implemented by this rule," the document states.


Share this on AAFP Connection

Search AAFP News Now

 

Government & Medicine

Simplify Diabetes Supply Regulations, Says AAFP

FMCC Highlights Growing Influence of Primary Care

AAFP Seeking Information on Parity Program

Bipartisan Study Looks for How to Save Health Care

Academy Pushes for Payment Reform

AAFP Announces Support for Truth in Advertising Measure

U.S. Needs to Invest in Primary Care, Says AAFP Member

AAFP Answers Questions on Health IT Expansion

Repeal OTC Provision, Says AAFP

AAFP Responds to Proposal on SGR, Medicare Payment Fix

President's Budget Proposes Cuts in GME

AAFP Pushes for Tavenner Confirmation as CMS Head

ONC Launches Online Health IT Discussion Forum

State Medicaid Programs Drive PCMH Initiatives Forward

Sequestration Cuts Go Into Effect

Report Calls for Changes in Physician Payment Models

AAFP Outlines Funding Needed for FP Training Programs

Team-based Care Is in Patients' Best Interest, Says AAFP Director

Community-based Primary Care Training Is Focus of Legislation

Speakers Give Political Insight Into Health Care Reform

What Sequestration Cuts Mean for Family Physicians

AAFP Notes Concerns About Global Surgical Package Codes

House Republicans Draft Proposal to Repeal SGR

Sequestration Cuts to Take Effect April 1

AAFP Takes Payment Reform Message to Capitol Hill

CMS Releases Final Sunshine Act Rule

Sequestration Cuts Prompt Grass-roots Outreach

AAFP Responds to State of Union Address

Members Offer Opinions on Medical School Debt

States Need to Speedily Implement Parity Provision

Legislation Would Eliminate Broken Medicare Payment Formula

Senate Committee Recognizes Role of Primary Care Physicians

Nation Must Support Primary Care Infrastructure, Says AAFP

Family Medicine Can Play Role in Stemming Violence

Further Budget Cuts Likely in March

Analysts Tally 2011 U.S. Health Care Spending Growth

Despite Delays, FPs Can Expect Full Payment on Parity Provision

Budget Deal Averts Medicare Payment Cuts

AAFP Supports Key Provisions of Health Care Reform

Congresswoman Sees Primary Care as Future of Health Care

FPs Need to Think About Medicare Options

VA Proposal Would Incorporate More Non-VA Physicians

Physician Groups Present United Front on SGR Cuts

AAFP Sets Legislative Priorities for Family Medicine

Groups Speak Out Against Elimination of Payment Parity

AAFP Unites Members to Speak Out to Congress on Cuts

FP Community Takes Steps to Protect GME Funding

AAFP Outlines Strategies for Curtailing Prescription Drug Abuse

Proposed Rules Cover ACA Provisions

AAFP Joins Other Groups Seeking to Overturn Florida Law

AAFP Continues to Press Congress for Payment Solution

'Family Medicine Matters,' AAFP Members Tell Congress

Groups Call on Supercommittee to Address Medical Liability Reform

Grassroots Efforts to Repeal SGR Continue

AAFP Joins AMA, Other Groups in Calling for SGR Repeal

Eliminating SGR May Come With High Price

Tobacco Oversight Must Include Cigars, Say AAFP, Other Groups

AAFP Rallies Congress of Delegates on Medicare Payment

AMA Task Force Focuses on Fixing the SGR

2012 Physician Fee Schedule Needs Work, Says AAFP

New Task Force Takes Steps to Better Value Primary Care

Deficit-reduction Plan Must Eliminate SGR, Says AAFP

Policy Brief Explains HHS Insurance Exchange Plans

Deficit-reduction Plan Falls Short, Says AAFP President

YouTube Video Designed to Encourage SGR Repeal