American Academy of Family Physicians

Printer-friendly version

Share this on AAFP Connection

Share this page

Possible Link Between Bisphosphonates, Esophageal Cancer Sparks FDA Review

Studies Examined to Date Show Conflicting Data

By News Staff

The FDA once again is examining safety data related to the use of bisphosphonates. This time, the agency is reviewing conflicting reports regarding oral bisphosphonates and the risk for esophageal cancer.
FDA News
Although the agency said in a July 21 safety announcement that its safety review is ongoing, at this time, the benefits the osteoporosis drugs provide in reducing the risk of serious fractures continue to outweigh the potential risks.

The largest studies the FDA has reviewed to date are two epidemiologic studies that used the same patient database -- the United Kingdom's General Practice Research Database -- but arrived at quite different conclusions. Although one of these studies found no increase in the risk of esophageal cancer with oral bisphosphonate use, the second study found a doubling of the esophageal cancer risk among patients who had 10 or more prescriptions for the drugs or who had taken them for more than three years.

Story Highlights

  • The FDA is reviewing safety data on oral bisphosphonates and an elevated risk for esophageal cancer associated with their use.
  • Two studies on this risk that used the same database produced conflicting results.
  • At this time, says the FDA, the benefits of bisphosphonates in reducing the incidence of serious fractures in people with osteoporosis continue to outweigh the risks.
Two other studies that used different patient databases reported either no increase in esophageal cancer risk or a reduced risk. Differences in study design and methodology may account for the discrepant findings, the FDA said. Because the studies are observational rather than randomized, for example, they are subject to bias and confounding.

The FDA issued the following information for physicians:
  • there are insufficient data to recommend endoscopic screening of asymptomatic patients;
  • esophagitis and other esophageal events have been reported, particularly in patients who do not follow the specific directions for use of oral bisphosphonates; and
  • patients should be instructed to carefully follow the directions for use of the drugs. Oral bisphosphonates -- with the exception of risedronate delayed-release, which is marketed as Atelvia -- should be taken with a full glass of plain water just after awakening in the morning. Risedronate delayed-release should be taken immediately after breakfast. Patients should not lie down or eat or drink anything for at least 30-60 minutes after taking any oral bisphosphonate.
Other drugs in the class are alendronate, which is marketed as Fosamax; ibandronate, which is marketed as Boniva; etidronate, which is marketed as Didronel; risedronate, which is marketed as Actonel; and tiludronate, which is marketed as Skelid.

The FDA previously reviewed safety data related to nonserious atrial fibrillation with bisphosphonate use, but the agency found no clear association. Last year, the agency alerted physicians to the risk of atypical fractures of the femur in patients taking bisphosphonates.

Physicians are encouraged to report adverse events involving bisphosphonate drugs to the FDA's MedWatch program.


Share this on AAFP Connection

Search AAFP News Now

 

Health of the Public

Though Waning, H7N9 Still Poses Pandemic Potential

AUA Says No to Routine PSA Screening

AAFP Criticizes Appeal of Plan B One-Step Ruling

AAFP to Hospitals: Stop Early Elective Deliveries

AAFP, USPSTF Differ Somewhat on HIV Screening Guidance

Zoledronic Acid Confers Both Pros, Cons

ACP Issues Guidance on PSA Screening

Abbott Recalls FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Meter

Discuss Drug Options With Women at Risk for Breast Cancer

Shingles Vaccine Effective, But Uptake Is Low

Evidence Lacking to Make Oral Cancer Screening Recommendation

Two External Guidelines Get Qualified AAFP Endorsement

USPSTF Recommends BRCA Testing for High-risk Women

Primary Care, Public Health Look for Ways to Integrate

Malfunction Prompts Glucose Meter Recall

Evidence Lacking on PAD Screening, Says USPSTF

Azithromycin Poses Arrhythmia Risk, Says FDA

Vets With PTSD Often Prescribed Inappropriate Meds

AIM-HI Offers Grants to Combat Childhood Obesity

USPSTF Says No to Low-dose Vitamin D, Calcium to Prevent Fractures

PCV13, HibMenCY Vaccine Changes Approved by ACIP

AAFP, Other Groups Release More Choosing Wisely Lists

National Office Champions Tobacco Cessation Project Successful

USPSTF Issues Draft Statement on Glaucoma Screening

Study Examines Overuse, Inappropriate Use of Health Services

Apply to Become an AAFP Vaccine Science Fellow

Study Looks to Reduce PSA Screening Risks

AAP Issues New Clinical Guidance on Type 2 Diabetes

CDC: Adult Vaccination Rates Still Too Low

Pertussis Outbreaks Declining, but Immunization Still Key

2013 Immunization Schedules Include Several Changes

FDA Warns of Liver Injury Risk With Samsca Use

FDA Approves First Recombinant Trivalent Influenza Vaccine

AAFP, USPSTF: Screen Women of Childbearing Age for Partner Violence

Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women Costly, Likely Ineffective

CDC Gives Flu Update, Urges Continued Vaccination

Aerobic Exercise Beats Resistance Training for Weight Control