American Academy of Family Physicians

Printer-friendly version

Share this on AAFP Connection

Share this page

FDA Announces Classwide REMS for Specific Fentanyl Medications

Action Could Cut Access to These Short-acting Opioids, Say FPs

By Matt Brown

The FDA recently announced it has approved a single shared-system risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) for the entire class of transmucosal immediate-release fentanyl (TIRF) prescription medications. The so-called TIRF REMS Access program, which would supersede the individual TIRF medication REMS programs currently in place, is scheduled to go live in March.
FDA News
Under the new program -- the first-ever classwide REMS approved by the agency -- prescribers, pharmacies, distributors and outpatients will be able to enroll in one REMS program to prescribe, dispense or receive all drugs in the category. Currently, the FDA requires enrollment in a different REMS program for each individual TIRF drug, which include the brand-name medications Abstral, Actiq, Fentora, Lazanda and Onsolis.

Physicians who prescribe TIRF medications that will be used only in an inpatient setting (e.g., hospitals, long-term care facilities) will not be required to enroll in the TIRF REMS Access program. Similarly, patients who receive the medications in an inpatient setting will not be required to enroll.

According to an agency press release, the REMS is intended to mitigate the risks of misuse, abuse, addiction, overdose and serious complications associated with TIRF medications by

story highlights

  • The FDA has called for a new risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) that covers the entire class of transmucosal immediate-release fentanyl medications.
  • The REMS is the first to cover an entire category of opioids.
  • The FDA expects the program to improve patient access to the drugs.
  • Two family physicians interviewed expressed concern, however, that the move could prove burdensome for physicians and impair patient access.
  • ensuring that the medications are prescribed for and dispensed only to appropriate patients;
  • preventing inappropriate conversion between fentanyl products;
  • preventing accidental exposure to children and others for whom the drugs were not prescribed; and
  • educating prescribers, pharmacists and patients on the potential for misuse, abuse, addiction and overdose seen with these drugs.
Physicians who wish to enroll in the REMS program must review the TIRF education program, successfully complete a knowledge assessment and fill out an enrollment form. Additional information about the enrollment process will be available on the TIRF REMS Access program website when it goes live in March.

The FDA said it does not expect the REMS to negatively affect patient access to TIRF medications and, in fact, expects the program to improve patient access to the drugs. Those already enrolled in existing product-specific TIRF REMS programs will be transitioned automatically to the new program, the agency noted.

According to Wendy Biggs, M.D., assistant director in the AAFP Medical Education Division, setting up a classwide REMS could streamline the prescribing process for family physicians, but she said she is hesitant to completely sign off on the idea.

"Doing any REMS could potentially have a negative effect on a physician's practice," said Biggs. "If the perceived effort to complete the REMS outweighs the benefit of prescribing the medicine, this could possibly prompt physicians to refuse to prescribe (drugs covered by the REMS) at all."

Ann Karty, M.D., medical director in the AAFP Continuing Medical Education Division, agreed with Biggs' reservations.

"Anything that affects the physician's ability to prescribe, be it a registry or mandatory education, has the potential for a big impact to family physicians and patients," Karty told AAFP News Now.

In this most recent announcement, the FDA also noted that it is "continuing work on another class REMS for the class of long-acting and extended-release opioids."

In April 2011, the FDA announced it would require manufacturers of long-acting and extended-release opioids to develop a REMS that would include voluntary CME for prescribers of the drugs in an effort to reduce abuse of the products. The FDA decision accompanied legislation sponsored by Sen. John Rockefeller, D-W.Va., that would amend the Controlled Substances Act by requiring physicians and other health care professionals seeking to obtain or renew a DEA registration number to complete CME related to responsible opioid-prescribing practices.

In August, (then) AAFP President Roland Goertz, M.D., M.B.A., of Waco, Texas, wrote in AAFP News Now about the Academy's view that requiring physicians to complete CME to prescribe opioids is unnecessary and most likely would place an additional burden on physicians that could, in turn, cut access to pain medications for some patients.

Goertz followed up with a September letter to Rockefeller citing the AAFP's policy opposing legislation or other actions that would mandate education for family physicians as a condition for prescribing specific drugs. He also suggested measures that could more effectively address opioids abuse.

Citing the extensive education FPs already complete during their medical training and as part of their continuing professional development, "The AAFP does not believe that requiring additional education (for family physicians) will solve the problem of drug diversion," Goertz said in the letter. It should be left up to state licensing boards to deal with the few physicians who prescribe opioids inappropriately, he noted. In addition, every state should have an effective tracking system capable of identifying abusers of these medications.

Share this on AAFP Connection

Search AAFP News Now

 

Health of the Public

Though Waning, H7N9 Still Poses Pandemic Potential

AUA Says No to Routine PSA Screening

AAFP Criticizes Appeal of Plan B One-Step Ruling

AAFP to Hospitals: Stop Early Elective Deliveries

AAFP, USPSTF Differ Somewhat on HIV Screening Guidance

Zoledronic Acid Confers Both Pros, Cons

ACP Issues Guidance on PSA Screening

Abbott Recalls FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Meter

Discuss Drug Options With Women at Risk for Breast Cancer

Shingles Vaccine Effective, But Uptake Is Low

Evidence Lacking to Make Oral Cancer Screening Recommendation

Two External Guidelines Get Qualified AAFP Endorsement

USPSTF Recommends BRCA Testing for High-risk Women

Primary Care, Public Health Look for Ways to Integrate

Malfunction Prompts Glucose Meter Recall

Evidence Lacking on PAD Screening, Says USPSTF

Azithromycin Poses Arrhythmia Risk, Says FDA

Vets With PTSD Often Prescribed Inappropriate Meds

AIM-HI Offers Grants to Combat Childhood Obesity

USPSTF Says No to Low-dose Vitamin D, Calcium to Prevent Fractures

PCV13, HibMenCY Vaccine Changes Approved by ACIP

AAFP, Other Groups Release More Choosing Wisely Lists

National Office Champions Tobacco Cessation Project Successful

USPSTF Issues Draft Statement on Glaucoma Screening

Study Examines Overuse, Inappropriate Use of Health Services

Apply to Become an AAFP Vaccine Science Fellow

Study Looks to Reduce PSA Screening Risks

AAP Issues New Clinical Guidance on Type 2 Diabetes

CDC: Adult Vaccination Rates Still Too Low

Pertussis Outbreaks Declining, but Immunization Still Key

2013 Immunization Schedules Include Several Changes

FDA Warns of Liver Injury Risk With Samsca Use

FDA Approves First Recombinant Trivalent Influenza Vaccine

AAFP, USPSTF: Screen Women of Childbearing Age for Partner Violence

Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women Costly, Likely Ineffective

CDC Gives Flu Update, Urges Continued Vaccination

Aerobic Exercise Beats Resistance Training for Weight Control