American Academy of Family Physicians

Printer-friendly version

Share this on AAFP Connection

Share this page

USPSTF's New Cervical Cancer Screening Guidance Includes Changes, Options

AAFP Is Reviewing, Will Issue Its Guidance Soon

By Matt Brown

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) updated its screening guidelines for cervical cancer March 14, issuing final recommendations that include some significant changes.
CDC image of cervical cancer
This image depicts erosion to the cervix caused by low-grade cervical carcinoma. The USPSTF recommends that women ages 21-65 be screened for cervical cancer regardless of sexual history.
The USPSTF recommends that women ages 21-65 who have a cervix have a Pap smear "every three years," which is largely consistent with its earlier position. But in the new recommendations, the task force is offering an alternative for women ages 30-65 who want to be screened less frequently. This subset now may choose to undergo a combination of Pap smear and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing every five years.

That option represents a change from the task force's previous stance, which stated that evidence was insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of HPV testing, alone or in combination with cytology, for screening women 30 and older. The USPSTF did not change its recommendation against cervical cancer screening using HPV testing, alone or with cytology, in women younger than 30.

"Evidence showed that the expected harms (such as unnecessary procedures, false positives and possible problems with future pregnancies) of this screening in this (30 and younger) group outweighed the potential benefits," the USPSTF said in a press release.

story highlights

  • The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has made its final recommendations regarding screening guidelines for cervical cancer.
  • The task force recommends that women ages 21-65 who have a cervix have a Pap smear every three years, but also said women ages 30-65 now can opt for combination Pap smear and human papillomavirus testing every five years.
  • The Academy is reviewing the new guidelines and will make its own recommendations at a later date.
USPSTF Co-vice Chair Michael LeFevre, M.D., M.S.P.H., of Columbia, Mo., said it is also important to note that sexual history now plays no part in the decision to screen or not to screen.

"It is not factored into the age to start, age to stop or the intensity of screening," he told AAFP News Now.

The USPSTF continues to recommend against screening
  • women who have had a hysterectomy with removal of the cervix and do not have a history of a high-grade precancerous lesion,
  • women younger than 21, and
  • women older than 65 who previously have been adequately screened and are not at a high risk for cervical cancer.
All of the recommendations apply to women who have a cervix, regardless of sexual history, but do not apply to women who have received a diagnosis of a high-grade precancerous cervical lesion or cervical cancer, women with in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol, or women who are immunocompromised.

According to the USPSTF release, the final recommendations are in line with those of other organizations, such as the soon-to-be-released joint guidelines from the American Cancer Society, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and the American Society for Clinical Pathology, as well as guidelines from the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

The AAFP currently is reviewing the guidelines and will release its recommendations when a determination has been made. In the interim, the Academy has added a notation to its current guidelines stating that each recommendation is "being reviewed for updating."

Share this on AAFP Connection

Search AAFP News Now

 

Health of the Public

Though Waning, H7N9 Still Poses Pandemic Potential

AUA Says No to Routine PSA Screening

AAFP Criticizes Appeal of Plan B One-Step Ruling

AAFP to Hospitals: Stop Early Elective Deliveries

AAFP, USPSTF Differ Somewhat on HIV Screening Guidance

Zoledronic Acid Confers Both Pros, Cons

ACP Issues Guidance on PSA Screening

Abbott Recalls FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Meter

Discuss Drug Options With Women at Risk for Breast Cancer

Shingles Vaccine Effective, But Uptake Is Low

Evidence Lacking to Make Oral Cancer Screening Recommendation

Two External Guidelines Get Qualified AAFP Endorsement

USPSTF Recommends BRCA Testing for High-risk Women

Primary Care, Public Health Look for Ways to Integrate

Malfunction Prompts Glucose Meter Recall

Evidence Lacking on PAD Screening, Says USPSTF

Azithromycin Poses Arrhythmia Risk, Says FDA

Vets With PTSD Often Prescribed Inappropriate Meds

AIM-HI Offers Grants to Combat Childhood Obesity

USPSTF Says No to Low-dose Vitamin D, Calcium to Prevent Fractures

PCV13, HibMenCY Vaccine Changes Approved by ACIP

AAFP, Other Groups Release More Choosing Wisely Lists

National Office Champions Tobacco Cessation Project Successful

USPSTF Issues Draft Statement on Glaucoma Screening

Study Examines Overuse, Inappropriate Use of Health Services

Apply to Become an AAFP Vaccine Science Fellow

Study Looks to Reduce PSA Screening Risks

AAP Issues New Clinical Guidance on Type 2 Diabetes

CDC: Adult Vaccination Rates Still Too Low

Pertussis Outbreaks Declining, but Immunization Still Key

2013 Immunization Schedules Include Several Changes

FDA Warns of Liver Injury Risk With Samsca Use

FDA Approves First Recombinant Trivalent Influenza Vaccine

AAFP, USPSTF: Screen Women of Childbearing Age for Partner Violence

Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women Costly, Likely Ineffective

CDC Gives Flu Update, Urges Continued Vaccination

Aerobic Exercise Beats Resistance Training for Weight Control