American Academy of Family Physicians

Printer-friendly version

Share this on AAFP Connection

Share this page

USPSTF Updates Stance on Screening Women, Elderly for Violence

By Matt Brown

Shadow looming over women huddled in corner
(Editor's Note: Both the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the AAFP released final recommendations on screening for intimate partner violence in January 2013.)
In its new draft recommendations on screening for intimate partner violence (IPV) and abuse of elderly and vulnerable adults, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends clinicians screen women of childbearing age for IPV and either provide or refer women who screen positive to intervention services. However, the task force is less sure about the benefits of screening elderly or vulnerable adults.
The task force changed its 2004 stance on IPV after an evidence review indicated that currently available screening instruments "accurately identify women experiencing IPV" and that the benefits of screening outweigh the harms.

"For IPV, there is adequate evidence that available screening instruments can identify current and past abuse or increased risk for abuse," the USPSTF said in its statement. "Several instruments used in more than one study were highly sensitive and specific. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening women of childbearing age for IPV has a moderate net benefit."

The B recommendation on IPV from the task force applies to asymptomatic adult women ranging from 14 to 46 years of age.

story highlights

  • After an evidence review, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) now recommends that clinicians screen women of childbearing age for intimate partner violence and either provide or refer women who screen positive to intervention services.
  • The USPSTF did not change its recommendation regarding screening for abuse of elderly and vulnerable adults, concluding too little evidence exists to recommend for or against screening.
  • The comment period on the draft recommendations ends July 10 at 5 pm EDT.
The AAFP, which has not yet updated its own 2004 recommendations, recognizes that all family physicians should be "alert to physical and behavioral signs and symptoms associated with abuse or neglect," but in 2004, the Academy had concluded that the evidence was insufficient to recommend for or against screening adults or adolescents of either sex for intimate partner violence. The Academy plans to update its recommendations after the USPSTF publishes its final conclusions later this year.

The task force's new draft recommendation statement is available for comment until July 10, 2012, at 5 pm EDT.

With regard to screening elderly or vulnerable adults (i.e., physically or mentally dysfunctional adults) for abuse and neglect, the task force and the Academy remain on the same page, concluding that the evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of the benefits and harms of screening.

"Little information is available on the prevalence of abuse among noninstitutionalized elderly or vulnerable adults, although reported rates range from 2 to 25 percent," the USPSTF said in its statement.

The task force also said evidence was insufficient to affirm the accuracy of screening or early detection or that screening or early detection reduces exposure.

According to the USPSTF statement, child abuse and neglect will be addressed in a separate draft recommendation that is being developed.

Share this on AAFP Connection

Search AAFP News Now

 

Health of the Public

Remain Vigiliant for Novel Coronavirus, Says CDC

DTaP Remains in Short Supply This Summer

Though Waning, H7N9 Still Poses Pandemic Potential

AUA Says No to Routine PSA Screening

AAFP Criticizes Appeal of Plan B One-Step Ruling

AAFP to Hospitals: Stop Early Elective Deliveries

AAFP, USPSTF Differ Somewhat on HIV Screening Guidance

Zoledronic Acid Confers Both Pros, Cons

ACP Issues Guidance on PSA Screening

Abbott Recalls FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Meter

Discuss Drug Options With Women at Risk for Breast Cancer

Shingles Vaccine Effective, But Uptake Is Low

Evidence Lacking to Make Oral Cancer Screening Recommendation

Two External Guidelines Get Qualified AAFP Endorsement

USPSTF Recommends BRCA Testing for High-risk Women

Primary Care, Public Health Look for Ways to Integrate

Malfunction Prompts Glucose Meter Recall

Evidence Lacking on PAD Screening, Says USPSTF

Azithromycin Poses Arrhythmia Risk, Says FDA

Vets With PTSD Often Prescribed Inappropriate Meds

AIM-HI Offers Grants to Combat Childhood Obesity

USPSTF Says No to Low-dose Vitamin D, Calcium to Prevent Fractures

PCV13, HibMenCY Vaccine Changes Approved by ACIP

AAFP, Other Groups Release More Choosing Wisely Lists

National Office Champions Tobacco Cessation Project Successful

USPSTF Issues Draft Statement on Glaucoma Screening

Study Examines Overuse, Inappropriate Use of Health Services

Apply to Become an AAFP Vaccine Science Fellow

Study Looks to Reduce PSA Screening Risks

AAP Issues New Clinical Guidance on Type 2 Diabetes

CDC: Adult Vaccination Rates Still Too Low

Pertussis Outbreaks Declining, but Immunization Still Key

2013 Immunization Schedules Include Several Changes

FDA Warns of Liver Injury Risk With Samsca Use

FDA Approves First Recombinant Trivalent Influenza Vaccine

AAFP, USPSTF: Screen Women of Childbearing Age for Partner Violence

Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women Costly, Likely Ineffective

CDC Gives Flu Update, Urges Continued Vaccination

Aerobic Exercise Beats Resistance Training for Weight Control