American Academy of Family Physicians

Printer-friendly version

Share this on AAFP Connection

Share this page

New Tools Will Aid Doctor-Patient Discussions on Prostate Cancer, Treatment Options

By News Staff

In light of recently updated recommendations for prostate cancer screening from the AAFP and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), FamilyDoctor.org has updated its patient education resources on prostate cancer and added a newly developed handout covering the pros and cons of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening to detect the disease.
FamilyDoctor.org: health information for the whole family
The new resources are a response to AAFP member requests for such resources after the Academy and the USPSTF in May recommended against performing PSA-based screening for prostate cancer in asymptomatic men. The recommendation was in response to evidence that indicated the harms of the test outweigh its benefits.

The D recommendation, which applies to asymptomatic men in the general U.S. population, regardless of age, does not include the use of the PSA test for surveillance after diagnosis or treatment of prostate cancer.

According to available data, 90 percent of U.S. men with PSA-detected prostate cancer are treated, and as many as five in 1,000 men who are treated surgically will die within one month of the surgery. In addition, the PSA test often produces false-positive results, which are associated with negative psychological effects and other adverse events.

In May, AAFP President Glen Stream, M.D., M.B.I., of Spokane, Wash., told AAFP News Now that when it comes to testing or not, the decision remains between individual doctors and their patients, but it needs to be done using all the information available.

"Having that discussion, and knowing the test may do more harm than good, is important," Stream said.

Share this on AAFP Connection

Search AAFP News Now

 

Health of the Public

Though Waning, H7N9 Still Poses Pandemic Potential

AUA Says No to Routine PSA Screening

AAFP Criticizes Appeal of Plan B One-Step Ruling

AAFP to Hospitals: Stop Early Elective Deliveries

AAFP, USPSTF Differ Somewhat on HIV Screening Guidance

Zoledronic Acid Confers Both Pros, Cons

ACP Issues Guidance on PSA Screening

Abbott Recalls FreeStyle InsuLinx Blood Glucose Meter

Discuss Drug Options With Women at Risk for Breast Cancer

Shingles Vaccine Effective, But Uptake Is Low

Evidence Lacking to Make Oral Cancer Screening Recommendation

Two External Guidelines Get Qualified AAFP Endorsement

USPSTF Recommends BRCA Testing for High-risk Women

Primary Care, Public Health Look for Ways to Integrate

Malfunction Prompts Glucose Meter Recall

Evidence Lacking on PAD Screening, Says USPSTF

Azithromycin Poses Arrhythmia Risk, Says FDA

Vets With PTSD Often Prescribed Inappropriate Meds

AIM-HI Offers Grants to Combat Childhood Obesity

USPSTF Says No to Low-dose Vitamin D, Calcium to Prevent Fractures

PCV13, HibMenCY Vaccine Changes Approved by ACIP

AAFP, Other Groups Release More Choosing Wisely Lists

National Office Champions Tobacco Cessation Project Successful

USPSTF Issues Draft Statement on Glaucoma Screening

Study Examines Overuse, Inappropriate Use of Health Services

Apply to Become an AAFP Vaccine Science Fellow

Study Looks to Reduce PSA Screening Risks

AAP Issues New Clinical Guidance on Type 2 Diabetes

CDC: Adult Vaccination Rates Still Too Low

Pertussis Outbreaks Declining, but Immunization Still Key

2013 Immunization Schedules Include Several Changes

FDA Warns of Liver Injury Risk With Samsca Use

FDA Approves First Recombinant Trivalent Influenza Vaccine

AAFP, USPSTF: Screen Women of Childbearing Age for Partner Violence

Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women Costly, Likely Ineffective

CDC Gives Flu Update, Urges Continued Vaccination

Aerobic Exercise Beats Resistance Training for Weight Control