American Academy of Family Physicians

Printer-friendly version

Share this on AAFP Connection

Share this page

Point/Counterpoint

The Pluses of PQRI: Experience, Quality Competition, Extra Income

By David Filipi, M.D., M.B.A.

Dr. Filipi is vice president of medical affairs at the Methodist Physicians Clinic in Omaha, Neb., and is a member of the AAFP Commission on Quality.

The nearly 50 family physicians of Methodist Physicians Clinic in Nebraska and Iowa are generally enthusiastic supporters of CMS’ Physician Quality Reporting Initiative, or PQRI.

Early Steps

When PQRI was first introduced, our finance managers recognized the impact of an additional 1.5 percent on the Medicare revenues of our 150-physician practice. Those managers encouraged us to devote sufficient resources to achieve this bonus.
Another viewpoint on CMS’ Physician Quality Reporting Initiative.
Early on, we engaged our coding and billing department to help us develop tools and processes to successfully capture the quality codes needed. We also met with each clinical department to determine which indicators made the most clinical sense for their practices, recognizing the differences between hospitalists, surgeons and primary care physicians.

David Hillman Filipi, M.D., of Omaha, Neb.
David Filipi, M.D., M.B.A.
Our goal was to minimize physician work effort to capture these quality codes, adding just a few more seconds to each targeted encounter. We were able to achieve that through brightly colored stickers, affixed to the encounter sheet of each targeted diagnosis.

In addition, we added an inspection process to be certain that quality codes were present before the bill was sent to Medicare. We decided to follow this process for all targeted diagnoses for all payers.

Revenue Allocation

Our physician leadership team determined that physicians earning bonuses would be directly paid 40 percent of the amount earned, with 40 percent returning to their practice overhead and the remaining 20 percent kept back for implementation and rewards for future quality projects.

We spent little time discussing the philosophy of such concepts as payment for reporting or payment for performance. Rather, we generally recognized that this is the latest in a number of insurance trends, that of clinical quality transparency.

What We Gained

Participation gave us experience, the opportunity to compete within our group on clinical quality outcomes, and a little extra personal income. Participation challenged us to confirm and improve our practice of medicine.

Ultimately, however, our success at Methodist Physicians Clinic came from our ability to work with coders, billers and operations personnel to make reporting easy for our physicians.

Share this on AAFP Connection

Search AAFP News Now

 

As We See It: Voices From the AAFP

A Perfect Time to Talk About Breastfeeding

The Joys -- and Advantages -- of Solo Practice

AAFP Commission Helps Save Members Time

A Meaningful Discussion About Meaningful Use

Finding, Using Resources Key to Transforming Practice

AAFP.org Coming Soon to a Mobile Device Near You

Proposed Rule Will Increase Primary Care Medicaid Payments

Students and Residents Can Make a Difference for Family Medicine

More Academy Members Mean More Influence for Family Medicine

USAFP President Installed Via Skype

I'm Still Listening; So What Do You Have to Say?

FMCC Helps Members Advocate for Family Medicine

What Happens When a Doctor Becomes the Patient?

Let's Help Our Patients Make Informed Decisions on Tests, Procedures

AAFP Watches Closely as Supreme Court Considers Health Reform Law

Questions Raised About Future of Family Medicine Training

Join Office Champions; Improve Smoking Cessation

President Addresses Reasons for RUC Decision

As Match Day Nears, Student Board Member Shares Wishes for Family Medicine

'Inspirational' Forum Grooms FP Leaders, Helps Chapters

AAFP Resources Can Help Us Help Returning Vets

Send a New Physician to NCSC

Medicare Payment Key Issue in Latest Round of Meetings with Congress, CMS

Building Student Interest Focus of Family Medicine Stakeholders

Physician Groups Unite Behind SGR Message to Congress

Task Force Finalizing Recommendations to Improve Fee-for-Service

Health Plans Beginning to Pay for PCMH

New Member Benefit Delta-Exchange Can Help Practices Transform to PCMHs

Stressing the Importance of Fair Payment for Primary Care

Congress: Fix the Medicare Payment System

Office-based Practices Are Focus of AAFP NRN

Breadth of Opportunities in Family Medicine Intrigue Medical Students

FamMedPAC Influence Grows in Election Year

Making Family Medicine Stronger in 2012

Medicare Payment Issues Require Permanent Solution

Congress Failure on Medicare Payment Fix Unacceptable

Preventing the Medicare Payment Cut

AAFP, TransforMED Mingle Resource for Members

Giving Thanks

Evidence Doesn't Show That NPs Measure Up to FPs

Proposal Offers Hope for SGR Solution

Spreading Our Message

President's Message: PCMH Investments Pay Dividends

Protect Funding for Primary Care Training

How You Can Help Solve the SGR Issue

RUC's Failings Shouldn't Deter Student Interest in Family Medicine

On the Hill

Stand Up for Family Medicine

A Conversation About Fair Payment

CHFM Preserves, Shares Specialty's Inspirational History

AAFP Leaders Join Social Media Revolution

AAFP President Reviews Member Survey Results

AAFP Says 'No' to Mandatory Opioids CME

Dealing Strategically With the RUC to Boost Payment

AAFP News Now Changes Editorial Direction

Bioterrorism and the Vital Role of Family Physicians

Helping Small Practices Survive Health System Change

As Membership Grows, So Does Our Influence

Students Believe in Future of Family Medicine