This was successfully posted to your pofile.
This box will close automatically in a few seconds. Close this window
We don't have an e-mail address on file for you. To use AAFP Connection, you must have an e-mail address in our records. Click Here
Medical Home Model Calls for New Payment Methods
Experimentation Is Name of the Game
By Paula Haas
"We're in a period of great experimentation," says John Swanson, director of the AAFP Practice Support Division and co-chair of the Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative, or PCPCC, Center for Multi-Stakeholder Demonstrations. "The reality is that, when it comes to medical home pilots and demonstration projects, payment methods and the amounts paid vary greatly."
Michael Bailit, president of the consulting firm Bailit Health Purchasing in Needham, Mass., agrees that experimentation is the name of the game. Bailit has worked extensively on the issue of medical home payment and recently co-authored the "Patient Centered Medical Home Purchaser Guide" for the PCPCC and the National Business Coalition on Health.
- Supplemental fee. This is the most frequently used method. It's often a per-member, per-month fee for medical home services, paid on top of existing fee-for-service payments. "Usually, but not always, practices have to do something to qualify for it," Bailit says, such as going through the National Committee for Quality Assurance, or NCQA, medical home recognition process. Often, the supplemental fee is accompanied by a pay-for-performance payment or the practice shares in any savings to total health care spending that can be attributed to the medical home.
- New service codes. Instead of a supplemental fee, some payers are developing new fee-for-service codes to pay for medical home services.
- Boosted fees. In this scenario, practices that meet certain criteria, such as NCQA Level 1 recognition, receive larger fee-for-service payments for currently existing codes than other practices receive. "Everyone recognizes this is not where we want to be going," Swanson says, "but it's easy, and claims processing is already set up to handle it. That's a huge deal for health plans."
- Capitation payment with additional performance incentive. "It's the least common approach, but it's talked about a lot," says Bailit. "Many think capitation was done incorrectly the last time, and we need to do it right this time. It's sometimes called a global payment because the word capitation has such a bitter taste for many people."
AAFP's Recommendations for Medical Home Payment
- reflect the value of physician and nonphysician staff work that falls outside of the face-to-face visit associated with patient-centered care management;
- pay for services associated with coordination of care both within a given practice and between consultants, ancillary providers and community resources;
- support adoption and use of health information technology for quality improvement;
- support provision of enhanced communication access, such as secure e-mail and telephone consultations;
- recognize the value of physician work associated with remote monitoring of clinical data using technology;
- allow for separate fee-for-service payments for face-to-face visits, but payments for care-management services that fall outside of the face-to-face visit, as described above, should not result in a reduction in payments for face-to-face visits;
- recognize case mix differences in the patient population being treated within the practice;
- allow physicians to share in savings from reduced hospitalizations associated with physician-guided care management in the office setting; and
- allow for additional payments for achieving measurable and continuous quality improvements.
Some medical home initiatives also offer practices significant in-kind benefits, says Bailit. Examples are participation in a learning collaborative, coaching to help the practice transform, and free patient registry software and the training to use it. "Or you may have a pilot that provides a per-member, per-month fee and also provides nurse care managers from a central location to all the participating practices," says Swanson.
The upcoming Medicare medical home demonstration project will pay a normal fee for service plus per-beneficiary, per-month care management fees that are substantially higher than the fees of other pilots and demonstration projects. CMS plans to pay an average of $40.40 or $51.70, depending on whether a practice qualifies as a Tier I ("typical") or Tier II ("enhanced") medical home, respectively. Fees will be adjusted upward or downward to take severity of illness into account.
The fee levels may be high, but they're not off the charts, says Swanson. "That's because every single patient will be over 65, with one or more documented chronic diseases. People may be surprised that Medicare would be willing to pay that much, but within the context of the patient population, it makes complete sense."
In addition, practices in the demo will be eligible to receive a share of any cost savings the demonstration project generates within Medicare, including hospital inpatient and emergency room savings.
A Time for Change
Times of turmoil often become times of social change, Grundy adds.
"In the Great Depression, Social Security came along," he says. "I think this time of turmoil exposes our weaknesses in terms of having folks who don't have health care coverage. That makes it more painful and visible. Even those who are gainfully employed are thinking, 'What if I lose my job?' There's a lot more political will now."
From the President
Here's the View From Outside the Medical Home Vortex (Members Only)
Team-Based Care Leads to Financial Success
Physician Benefits From State Program That Pays for Medical Home Status
States Take Lead in Adopting Medical Home Model
PCMH Likely to Form Basis of Federal Health Care Reform
Primary Care High on List of Possible Fixes