American Academy of Family Physicians

Printer-friendly version

Share this on AAFP Connection

Share this page

Patient Access to Lab Test Results

AAFP Supports Proposed HHS Rule on Clinical Lab Services While Addressing Concerns

By News Staff

The AAFP supports -- with reservations -- an HHS proposed rule that would, among other things, give patients the right to receive their medical test reports directly from labs.
Stock Photo-Two female lab works with vials
In a Nov. 9 letter (2-page PDF; About PDFs) to CMS Administrator Donald Berwick, M.D., AAFP Board Chair Roland Goertz, M.D., M.B.A., of Waco, Texas, said the Academy's support for the proposed rule is based on the premise that patients' access to their personal health information increases the level of patient engagement and responsibility and is in keeping with the basic tenets of the patient-centered medical home.

The proposed rule (13-page PDF; About PDFs) would amend the regulations tied to the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 to allow labs to give patients their test results on request. At the same time, the proposal would eliminate the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act privacy rule exception for an individual's access to lab reports. The amended privacy rule would preempt contrary state laws governing a patient's direct access to lab test results.

story highlights

  • HHS issued a proposed rule to amend regulations tied to the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988.
  • The proposed rule would give patients the right to receive their medical test reports directly from labs.
  • In a letter to HHS, the Academy stated its general support for the proposal and offered suggestions to counter concerns that some patients would not understand their test results without a physician's interpretation.
However, noted Goertz, some patients will not be able to comprehend their test reports, which is a concern for the AAFP. "Laboratory results are an integral part of the physician's diagnosis process, and interpreting the results is the responsibility of the ordering physicians," said Goertz. "The majority of patients are not trained to interpret their results."

To minimize these concerns, the Academy suggested to Berwick that physicians, patients and clinical laboratories collaborate to develop a standardized statement that would accompany lab results sent to patients. Such a statement should include contact information for the ordering physician and patient instructions explaining that clinical lab results are subject to physician interpretation.

Goertz offered the AAFP's expertise to help develop both the statement and a Medicare beneficiary guide that would list and summarize commonly ordered clinical lab services.

According to a table included in the proposed rule, 2010 data show that 39 states and U.S. territories have labs that would be impacted by the proposed amendments. Additional data show that the changes would affect 22,671 labs that processed more than 6 billion tests results in 2010.

Texas has the highest number of labs (3,211) that would be affected by the proposed rule, followed by North Carolina (1,424), Georgia (1,172), Ohio (1,112), Pennsylvania (1,095) and Illinois (1,077).

Share this on AAFP Connection

Search AAFP News Now

 

Practice & Professional Issues

Technical Glitch Causes Claims Rejections

Reducing Waste Could Reap Billions for Health Care

Meaningful Use Stage Two Proposal Sparks AAFP Concerns

Engaging Patients and Families in the PCMH

PCPCC Director Talks About Future Direction

First 27 ACOs Chosen for Medicare Shared Savings Program

CPCI to Launch in Seven Markets, Says CMS

Free Webinar Covers Implementation of PCMH Model

HHS Delays ICD-10 Compliance to 2014

Roadmap' Aims to Accelerate National Health Information Exchange

More e-Prescribing Penalties Kick In

5010 Transaction Standards Enforcement Delayed Again

PCMH Linked to Higher Job Satisfaction, Study Shows

PCMH Makeover Topic of TransforMED Webinar

Meaningful Use Stage Two Proposed Regulations Released

Study Challenges Theories on Computerization, Cost Savings

Military Focuses on Patient Care by Implementing PCMH Model

Updated Tool Measures PCMH Progress

'Blueprint' Seeks to Boost Vaccine Administration in Adults

HHS to Delay ICD-10 Implementation Date

Clearinghouse Lists Reasons for 5010 Claims Rejections

FPs Can Access Free Health Risk Assessment Resources

AAFP Has Concerns With CMS' Proposed 'Sunshine' Rule

Preventive Services Tool Helps FPs Get Paid

Toolkit Helps Evaluate HIPAA Compliance

FP Distribution Mirrors U.S. Population Distribution

Health Insurer Announces Plan to Pay Primary Care Docs More

AAFP Members Can Access Networking Resource for Free

Retroactive Rule Change Eases FPs' Workload

Patients, Physicians Diverge on Open-access Medical Notes

Regional Extension Centers a Mixed Bag for FPs

CMS Keeps Jan. 1 Deadline for 5010 Conversion Compliance

IOM Recommends Ways to Minimize Health IT-related Errors

Medicare to Pay for Obesity Screening, Intervention

FPs Share PCMH Pilot Project Experiences

PCMH Study Criticized by Family Medicine Leaders

AMA Delegates Vote on Range of Ethical, Advocacy Issues

Rule on Test Results Causes AAFP Concerns

Government Must Recognize Importance of Primary Care

AAFP Provides Primer for Flu Vaccine Payment

Summary Outlines Specifics of Final ACO Rule

PCMH Outcomes Data Indicate Model Can Be Successful

Do Family Physicians Think They Provide Too Much Care?

Deadline to Convert to 5010 Transaction Format Looms

Study Finds EHRs Lead to Better Diabetes Care

CMS Issues New Codes Related to E-Prescribing

AAFP Invited to Explain Its Stance to RUC Subcommittee

Number of CMS Contractor Entities Causes Confusion

FPs Carry PCMH Model Forward on State, Local Levels

CMS Calls for Applications to Join Bundled Payment Initiative

Webinar Details AAFP's Physician Messaging Service

Report Aims to Ease Transition From Pediatric to Adult Care

CMS: Revalidate Your Medicare Provider Enrollment

FPs Remain in High Demand, Says Physician Search Firm