This was successfully posted to your pofile.
This box will close automatically in a few seconds. Close this window
We don't have an e-mail address on file for you. To use AAFP Connection, you must have an e-mail address in our records. Click Here
Patient Access to Lab Test Results
AAFP Supports Proposed HHS Rule on Clinical Lab Services While Addressing Concerns
By News Staff
The proposed rule (13-page PDF; About PDFs) would amend the regulations tied to the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 to allow labs to give patients their test results on request. At the same time, the proposal would eliminate the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act privacy rule exception for an individual's access to lab reports. The amended privacy rule would preempt contrary state laws governing a patient's direct access to lab test results.
story highlights
- HHS issued a proposed rule to amend regulations tied to the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988.
- The proposed rule would give patients the right to receive their medical test reports directly from labs.
- In a letter to HHS, the Academy stated its general support for the proposal and offered suggestions to counter concerns that some patients would not understand their test results without a physician's interpretation.
To minimize these concerns, the Academy suggested to Berwick that physicians, patients and clinical laboratories collaborate to develop a standardized statement that would accompany lab results sent to patients. Such a statement should include contact information for the ordering physician and patient instructions explaining that clinical lab results are subject to physician interpretation.
Goertz offered the AAFP's expertise to help develop both the statement and a Medicare beneficiary guide that would list and summarize commonly ordered clinical lab services.
According to a table included in the proposed rule, 2010 data show that 39 states and U.S. territories have labs that would be impacted by the proposed amendments. Additional data show that the changes would affect 22,671 labs that processed more than 6 billion tests results in 2010.
Texas has the highest number of labs (3,211) that would be affected by the proposed rule, followed by North Carolina (1,424), Georgia (1,172), Ohio (1,112), Pennsylvania (1,095) and Illinois (1,077).
This was successfully posted to your pofile.
This box will close automatically in a few seconds. Close this window
We don't have an e-mail address on file for you. To use AAFP Connection, you must have an e-mail address in our records. Click Here
Patient Self-Management Focus of Webinar Series
Preparing for, Surviving Meaningful Use Audit
Direct Primary Care Offers Different Health Care Model
Webinar Addresses Direct Primary Care Practices
Support Helps Small Practices Transform to PCMH
FPs Look at Benefits, Problems With EHRs
Medicare Launches Bundled Payment Initiative
AAFP Reacts to CMS Proposed Rule
AAFP Makes Case for New Primary Care E/M Codes
Studies Look at Two Models to Improve Diabetes Care
Audits Delay Some EHR Bonus Payments
Webinar: Expert Tackles Meaningful Use Stage Two
Tools for ICD-10 Implementation Available From CMS
Research Compares e-Visits Versus Office Visits
'Time Out' on Meaningful Use Stage Three Rule-making
AAFP Offers Transitional Care Management Tools
Free Webinar Offers Guidance on ICD-10 Preparation
Primary Care Team Roles Can Enhance Patient Care
Proposed Rule Chips Away at Medicare Regulations
HHS Rolls Out HIPAA Omnibus Rule
EHR Adoption Rate Among FPs Continues to Climb
CMS Adds 106 New ACOs to Programs
White Paper Pursues Strategies to Overcome EHR Pitfalls
Webinar Offers Primer on PCMH Basics
Primary Care, PCMH Future of Health Care
Free Webinar Sorts Out Medicare Fee Schedule Details
HHS Should Delay, Rein in Meaningful Use Requirements
FP Steps Up During Hurricane Sandy
Physicians Without eRx Exemption Face Penalty
Organization Lists Top Five Physicians' Issues for 2013
