This was successfully posted to your pofile.
This box will close automatically in a few seconds. Close this window
We don't have an e-mail address on file for you. To use AAFP Connection, you must have an e-mail address in our records. Click Here
Patient Access to Lab Test Results
AAFP Supports Proposed HHS Rule on Clinical Lab Services While Addressing Concerns
By News Staff
The proposed rule (13-page PDF; About PDFs) would amend the regulations tied to the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 to allow labs to give patients their test results on request. At the same time, the proposal would eliminate the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act privacy rule exception for an individual's access to lab reports. The amended privacy rule would preempt contrary state laws governing a patient's direct access to lab test results.
story highlights
- HHS issued a proposed rule to amend regulations tied to the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988.
- The proposed rule would give patients the right to receive their medical test reports directly from labs.
- In a letter to HHS, the Academy stated its general support for the proposal and offered suggestions to counter concerns that some patients would not understand their test results without a physician's interpretation.
To minimize these concerns, the Academy suggested to Berwick that physicians, patients and clinical laboratories collaborate to develop a standardized statement that would accompany lab results sent to patients. Such a statement should include contact information for the ordering physician and patient instructions explaining that clinical lab results are subject to physician interpretation.
Goertz offered the AAFP's expertise to help develop both the statement and a Medicare beneficiary guide that would list and summarize commonly ordered clinical lab services.
According to a table included in the proposed rule, 2010 data show that 39 states and U.S. territories have labs that would be impacted by the proposed amendments. Additional data show that the changes would affect 22,671 labs that processed more than 6 billion tests results in 2010.
Texas has the highest number of labs (3,211) that would be affected by the proposed rule, followed by North Carolina (1,424), Georgia (1,172), Ohio (1,112), Pennsylvania (1,095) and Illinois (1,077).
This was successfully posted to your pofile.
This box will close automatically in a few seconds. Close this window
We don't have an e-mail address on file for you. To use AAFP Connection, you must have an e-mail address in our records. Click Here
Technical Glitch Causes Claims Rejections
Reducing Waste Could Reap Billions for Health Care
Meaningful Use Stage Two Proposal Sparks AAFP Concerns
Engaging Patients and Families in the PCMH
PCPCC Director Talks About Future Direction
First 27 ACOs Chosen for Medicare Shared Savings Program
CPCI to Launch in Seven Markets, Says CMS
Free Webinar Covers Implementation of PCMH Model
HHS Delays ICD-10 Compliance to 2014
Roadmap' Aims to Accelerate National Health Information Exchange
More e-Prescribing Penalties Kick In
5010 Transaction Standards Enforcement Delayed Again
PCMH Linked to Higher Job Satisfaction, Study Shows
PCMH Makeover Topic of TransforMED Webinar
Meaningful Use Stage Two Proposed Regulations Released
Study Challenges Theories on Computerization, Cost Savings
Military Focuses on Patient Care by Implementing PCMH Model
Updated Tool Measures PCMH Progress
'Blueprint' Seeks to Boost Vaccine Administration in Adults
HHS to Delay ICD-10 Implementation Date
Clearinghouse Lists Reasons for 5010 Claims Rejections
FPs Can Access Free Health Risk Assessment Resources
AAFP Has Concerns With CMS' Proposed 'Sunshine' Rule
Preventive Services Tool Helps FPs Get Paid
Toolkit Helps Evaluate HIPAA Compliance
FP Distribution Mirrors U.S. Population Distribution
Health Insurer Announces Plan to Pay Primary Care Docs More
AAFP Members Can Access Networking Resource for Free
Retroactive Rule Change Eases FPs' Workload
Patients, Physicians Diverge on Open-access Medical Notes
Regional Extension Centers a Mixed Bag for FPs
CMS Keeps Jan. 1 Deadline for 5010 Conversion Compliance
IOM Recommends Ways to Minimize Health IT-related Errors
Medicare to Pay for Obesity Screening, Intervention
FPs Share PCMH Pilot Project Experiences
PCMH Study Criticized by Family Medicine Leaders
AMA Delegates Vote on Range of Ethical, Advocacy Issues
Rule on Test Results Causes AAFP Concerns
Government Must Recognize Importance of Primary Care
AAFP Provides Primer for Flu Vaccine Payment
Summary Outlines Specifics of Final ACO Rule
PCMH Outcomes Data Indicate Model Can Be Successful
Do Family Physicians Think They Provide Too Much Care?
Deadline to Convert to 5010 Transaction Format Looms
Study Finds EHRs Lead to Better Diabetes Care
CMS Issues New Codes Related to E-Prescribing
AAFP Invited to Explain Its Stance to RUC Subcommittee
Number of CMS Contractor Entities Causes Confusion
FPs Carry PCMH Model Forward on State, Local Levels
CMS Calls for Applications to Join Bundled Payment Initiative
Webinar Details AAFP's Physician Messaging Service
Report Aims to Ease Transition From Pediatric to Adult Care
