American Academy of Family Physicians

Printer-friendly version

Share this on AAFP Connection

Share this page

Medicare Will Pay for Obesity Screening, Intervention, Says CMS

Financial Impact on FPs Still Unclear

By Matt Brown

CMS' recent announcement that obesity screening and counseling will be covered by Medicare could prove to be a boon for FPs, but it is too early to gauge the full impact of the agency's decision.
Stock Photo-Doc Weighing Obese Male
Cynthia Hughes, C.P.C., an AAFP coding and compliance specialist, said that the implications of the Nov. 29 announcement will not be known until CMS publishes claims processing rules and fee schedule values for the codes that will be used for these services, which now join Medicare's existing portfolio of preventive services available without cost-sharing according to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

"If the services are going to be bundled with other services on the same date, there is little value," Hughes told AAFP News Now. "If the codes are only bundled with preventive services, there may be value. With several new national coverage decisions for preventive counseling out there, it may be awhile before we see more detail."

Although the rule change means that, technically, Medicare beneficiaries should immediately be able to start receiving the services without having to make a copayment, in the absence of billing or coding guidelines, it may prove difficult for physicians to provide or even refer patients for a particular service, Hughes said.
Patrick Conway, M.D., M.Sc., CMS' chief medical officer and director of the agency’s Office of Clinical Standards and Quality, called the decision "an important step in aligning Medicare's portfolio of preventive services with evidence and addressing risk factors for disease."

story highlights

  • CMS has announced that obesity screening and intensive behavioral counseling now will be covered by Medicare.
  • According to an AAFP coding and compliance specialist, how these services are bundled will determine the financial impact for FPs.
"We at CMS are carefully and systematically reviewing the best available medical evidence to identify those preventive services that can keep Medicare beneficiaries as healthy as possible for as long as possible," he said in a news release announcing the change.

According to the agency's decision memo, "The USPSTF found good evidence that body mass index, or BMI … is reliable and valid for identifying adults at increased risk for mortality and morbidity due to overweight and obesity," said the memo. "There is fair to good evidence that high-intensity counseling -- about diet, exercise, or both -- together with behavioral interventions aimed at skill development, motivation and support strategies produces modest, sustained weight loss in adults who are obese."
The memo defined intensive behavioral therapy for obesity as consisting of
  • screening for obesity in adults using BMI measurement, with obesity defined as a BMI of 30 kg/m² or greater;
  • a dietary (nutritional) assessment; and
  • intensive behavioral counseling and behavioral therapy that promotes sustained weight loss through high-intensity interventions on diet and exercise.
Furthermore, said CMS, all such interventions should be consistent with the so-called 5-A framework highlighted by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, or USPSTF. This framework includes
  • asking about/assessing behavioral health risks and factors affecting choice of behavior change goals/methods;
  • giving clear, specific and personalized behavior change advice, including information about personal health harms and benefits;
  • collaboratively agreeing on appropriate treatment goals and methods based on the patient's interest in and willingness to change the behavior;
  • using behavior change techniques (e.g., self-help and/or counseling) to assist the patient to achieve agreed-upon goals by acquiring the skills, confidence and social/environmental supports for behavior change, supplemented with adjunctive medical treatments when appropriate; and
  • arranging scheduled follow-up contacts (in person or by telephone) to provide ongoing assistance/support and to adjust the treatment plan as needed, including referral to more intensive or specialized treatment.
CMS indicated in the decision memo that it will cover one face-to-face visit every week for the first month in the primary care setting, followed by one face-to-face visit every other week for the next five months and one face-to-face visit per month for a second six-month period. To continue to receive counseling beyond the initial six months, however, the beneficiary must have met a weight-loss threshold of at least 3 kg (6.6 lbs.).

Share this on AAFP Connection

Search AAFP News Now

 

Practice & Professional Issues

Webinar Explores Practice Space Redesign

Patient Self-Management Focus of Webinar Series

Preparing for, Surviving Meaningful Use Audit

Direct Primary Care Offers Different Health Care Model

Webinar Addresses Direct Primary Care Practices

Support Helps Small Practices Transform to PCMH

FPs Look at Benefits, Problems With EHRs

Medicare Launches Bundled Payment Initiative

AAFP Reacts to CMS Proposed Rule

AAFP Makes Case for New Primary Care E/M Codes

Studies Look at Two Models to Improve Diabetes Care

Audits Delay Some EHR Bonus Payments

Webinar: Expert Tackles Meaningful Use Stage Two

Tools for ICD-10 Implementation Available From CMS

Research Compares e-Visits Versus Office Visits

'Time Out' on Meaningful Use Stage Three Rule-making

AAFP Offers Transitional Care Management Tools

AAFP Protests CPT Code Edits

Free Webinar Offers Guidance on ICD-10 Preparation

Primary Care Team Roles Can Enhance Patient Care

Proposed Rule Chips Away at Medicare Regulations

HHS Rolls Out HIPAA Omnibus Rule

EHR Adoption Rate Among FPs Continues to Climb

CMS Adds 106 New ACOs to Programs

White Paper Pursues Strategies to Overcome EHR Pitfalls

Webinar Offers Primer on PCMH Basics

Primary Care, PCMH Future of Health Care

Free Webinar Sorts Out Medicare Fee Schedule Details

HHS Should Delay, Rein in Meaningful Use Requirements

FP Steps Up During Hurricane Sandy

Physicians Without eRx Exemption Face Penalty

Organization Lists Top Five Physicians' Issues for 2013

Physician Groups Advocate Halting ICD-10 Implementation

Primer on Payment Reform: Rewarding Value Over Volume