American Academy of Family Physicians

Printer-friendly version

Share this on AAFP Connection

Share this page

Comments on Multipayer PCMH Evaluation Demo Could Lead to Expanded Project

By News Staff

CMS is seeking comments on an evaluation process for a multipayer demonstration project that could determine whether the project is expanded and how it is expanded beyond the eight states where it currently operates.
The project, known as the Multi-Payer Advanced Primary Care Demonstration, relies on both public and private payers to compensate physicians and other providers for delivering coordinated care through patient-centered medical homes (PCMH) in Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Vermont. Launched in 2009, the project pays participating medical home practices via a combination of Medicare, Medicaid and private health plans.

CMS currently is assessing the effectiveness of the program, using both qualitative and quantitative data to determine whether the pilot project should be expanded beyond the eight states. The agency has published a notice (2-page PDF; About PDFs) in the Federal Register seeking public comments on how to better evaluate and revise its method of collecting information for the pilot project.

"The goal of evaluating and revising the CMS-855B enrollment application is to simplify and clarify the information collection without jeopardizing our need to collect specific information," says the Federal Register notice.

The information gathered by CMS will help the agency determine whether the pilot "should be expanded under Medicare and if so, what modifications and supports would be needed to implement similar innovations in other states and practices in the future."

Evaluation data for the current demonstration project are designed to gauge "the effects of advanced primary care practice when supported by Medicare, Medicaid and private health plans," according to CMS. And the evaluation itself is studying various features of the multi-payer project, such as payment models, PCMH transformation and outcomes data that address access to care, care coordination, beneficiary experience, and Medicare and Medicaid expenditures.

The date for submitting comments to CMS is July 30. Comments can be submitted electronically or by mail to CMS, Office of Strategic Operations and Regulatory Affairs, Division of Regulations Development, Room C4-26-05, 7500 Security Blvd., Baltimore, MD, 21244-1850.

Share this on AAFP Connection

Search AAFP News Now

 

Practice & Professional Issues

Patient Self-Management Focus of Webinar Series

Preparing for, Surviving Meaningful Use Audit

Direct Primary Care Offers Different Health Care Model

Webinar Addresses Direct Primary Care Practices

Support Helps Small Practices Transform to PCMH

FPs Look at Benefits, Problems With EHRs

Medicare Launches Bundled Payment Initiative

AAFP Reacts to CMS Proposed Rule

AAFP Makes Case for New Primary Care E/M Codes

Studies Look at Two Models to Improve Diabetes Care

Audits Delay Some EHR Bonus Payments

Webinar: Expert Tackles Meaningful Use Stage Two

Tools for ICD-10 Implementation Available From CMS

Research Compares e-Visits Versus Office Visits

'Time Out' on Meaningful Use Stage Three Rule-making

AAFP Offers Transitional Care Management Tools

AAFP Protests CPT Code Edits

Free Webinar Offers Guidance on ICD-10 Preparation

Primary Care Team Roles Can Enhance Patient Care

Proposed Rule Chips Away at Medicare Regulations

HHS Rolls Out HIPAA Omnibus Rule

EHR Adoption Rate Among FPs Continues to Climb

CMS Adds 106 New ACOs to Programs

White Paper Pursues Strategies to Overcome EHR Pitfalls

Webinar Offers Primer on PCMH Basics

Primary Care, PCMH Future of Health Care

Free Webinar Sorts Out Medicare Fee Schedule Details

HHS Should Delay, Rein in Meaningful Use Requirements

FP Steps Up During Hurricane Sandy

Physicians Without eRx Exemption Face Penalty

Organization Lists Top Five Physicians' Issues for 2013

Physician Groups Advocate Halting ICD-10 Implementation

Primer on Payment Reform: Rewarding Value Over Volume